4476 Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 15, 2009
Albertin et al.
Chart 1
0.4 mmol of the appropriate complex RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)P, an
excess of diazoalkane (1.2 mmol), an excess of NaBPh4
(0.6 mmol, 0.20 g), and 10 mL of ethanol. The reaction mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, and then the solid that
formed was filtered and crystallized from CH2Cl2 and ethanol;
yield g75%.
1
1a: IR (KBr) cm-1: νCdN = N 1925 (s). H NMR (CD2Cl2,
25 °C) δ: 7.75-6.88 (m, 35H, Ph), 5.67, 5.58, 5.37 (d, 4H, Ph
p-cym), 3.82, 3.70, 3.53 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.48 (m, 1H, CH), 1.85
(s, 3H, p-CH3), 1.14, 1.12 (d, 6H, CH3 iPr), 1.11 (t, 6H, CH3
phos). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: A spin system, 139.4 s.
Anal. Calcd for C57H59BClN2O2PRu: C, 69.69; H, 6.05; Cl,
3.68; N, 2.90. Found: C, 69.53; H, 6.13; Cl, 3.47; N, 2.78. ΛM=
56.3 Ω-1 mol-1 cm2.
2a: IR (KBr) cm-1: νCdNdN 1938 (s). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 25
°C) δ: 7.69-6.87 (m, 34H, Ph), 5.66, 5.58, 5.39 (d, 4H, Ph
p-cym), 3.82, 3.73, 3.55 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.43 (s, 3H, p-CH3
alkane), 2.40 (m, 1H, CH), 1.85 (s, 3H, p-CH3 p-cym), 1.13,
1.10 (d, 6H, CH3 iPr), 1.16, 1.10 (t, 6H, CH3 phos). 31P{1H}
NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: A spin system, 139.4 s. 13C{1H} NMR
(CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: 160-120 (m, Ph), 105.6, 98.9, 88.6, 80.9 (s, Ph
p-cym), 64.9 (d, CH2), 30.8 (s, CH), 24.2 (s, CH3 iPr), 21.9 (s, p-
CH3 alkane), 17.8 (s, p-CH3 p-cym), 16.4 (d, CH3 phos). Anal.
Calcd for C58H61BClN2O2PRu: C, 69.91; H, 6.17; Cl, 3.56; N,
2.81. Found: C, 69.78; H, 6.11; Cl, 3.40; N, 2.72. ΛM=52.8 Ω-1
mol-1 cm2.
containing both η5-alkoxyfluorenyl and η6-p-cymene as
ligands.
The results of these studies, which include the synthesis of
new diazoalkane complexes of ruthenium and of a novel
sandwich derivative, are reported here.
Experimental Section
2b: IR (KBr) cm-1: νCdNdN 1920 (s). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 25
°C) δ: 7.49-6.87 (m, 29H, Ph), 5.89, 5.49 (d, 4H, Ph p-cym),
4.19, 4.08 (qnt, 6H, CH2), 2.72 (m, 1H, CH), 2.43 (s, 3H, p-CH3
alkane), 2.09 (s, 3H, p-CH3 p-cym), 1.26, 1.24 (d, 6H, CH3 iPr),
1.14 (t, 9H, CH3 phos). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: A spin
system, 112.3 s. Anal. Calcd for C54H61BClN2O3PRu: C, 67.25;
H, 6.38; Cl, 3.68; N, 2.90. Found: C, 67.11; H, 6.47; Cl, 3.50; N,
2.78. ΛM=56.1 Ω-1 mol-1 cm2.
General Comments. All synthetic work was carried out in an
appropriate atmosphere (Ar) using standard Schlenk techniques
or an inert atmosphere drybox. Once isolated, the complexes
were found to be relatively stable in air, but were stored under
nitrogen at -25 °C. All solvents were dried over appropriate
drying agents, degassed on a vacuum line, and distilled into
vacuum-tight storage flasks. RuCl3 3H2O was a Pressure Che-
3
mical Co. (USA) product, used as received. Phosphite PPh
(OEt)2 was prepared by the method of Rabinowitz and Pellon,11
while P(OEt)3 was an Aldrich product purified by distillation
under nitrogen. Diaryldiazoalkanes (Ar1Ar2CN2) and 9-diazo-
fluorene (C12H8CN2) were prepared according to literature
procedures.12 Other reagents were purchased from commercial
sources in the highest available purity and used as received.
Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum-
One FT-IR spectrophotometer. NMR spectra (1H, 31P, 13C)
were obtained on AC200 or AVANCE 300 Bruker spectro-
meters at temperatures between -90 and þ30 °C, unless other-
wise noted. 1H and 13C spectra are referred to internal
tetramethylsilane, and 31P{1H} chemical shifts are reported with
respect to 85% H3PO4 with downfield shifts considered positive.
COSY, HMQC, and HMBC NMR experiments were per-
formed with standard programs. The SwaN-MR and iNMR
software packages13 were used to treat NMR data. The con-
ductivity of 10-3 mol dm-3 solutions of the complexes in
CH3NO2 at 25 °C was measured on a Radiometer CDM 83.
Elemental analyses were determined in the Microanalytical
Laboratory of the Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche,
University of Padova (Italy).
[Ru(η5-EtO-fluorenyl)(η6-p-cymene)]BPh4 (3a). In a 25 mL
three-necked round-bottomed flask were placed 300 mg
(0.64 mmol) of solid RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)(PiPr3), an excess of 9-
diazofluorene (C12H8CN2) (2.0 mmol, 0.38 g), an excess of
NaBPh4 (1.0 mmol, 0.34 g), and 10 mL of ethanol. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 24 h, and then the brown solid formed was
filteredandcrystallizedfrom CH2Cl2 and ethanol. Orange crystals
of the complex were obtained by diffusion of ethanol into an
acetone solution of the crystallized compound; yield g55%.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: 8.18-6.88 (m, 28H, Phþfluor-
enyl), 5.06, 4.95 (d, 4H, Ph p-cym), 4.32 (q, 2H, OCH2), 1.93 (m,
1H, CH), 1.60 (s, 3H, p-CH3), 1.51 (t, 3H, CH3 OEt), 1.10 (d, 6H,
CH3 iPr). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: 165-120 (m,
Phþfluorenyl), 108.1, 97.6, 88.05, 84.6 (s, Ph p-cym), 71.7 (s,
OCH2), 30.2 (s, CH), 22.3 (s, CH3 iPr), 16.7 (s, p-CH3), 15.9 (s,
CH3 OEt). Anal. Calcd for C49H47BORu: C, 77.05; H, 6.20.
Found: C, 77.17; H, 6.14. ΛM=55.3 Ω-1 mol-1 cm2.
[Ru(η5-MeO-fluorenyl)(η6-p-cymene)]BPh4 (3b). This com-
plex was prepared exactly like the related ethoxyfluorenyl 3a,
but using methanol as a solvent; yield g60%.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: 8.20-6.86 (m, 28H, Phþfluor-
enyl), 5.07, 4.95 (d, 4H, Ph p-cym), 4.11 (s, 3H, OCH3), 1.87 (m,
1H, CH), 1.54 (s, 3H, p-CH3), 1.07 (d, 6H, CH3 iPr). 13C{1H}
NMR (CD2Cl2, 25 °C) δ: 165-122 (m, Phþfluorenyl), 107.97,
87.0, 84.4 (s, Ph p-cym), 62.4 (s, OCH3), 30.0 (s, CH), 22.2 (s, CH3
iPr), 16.6 (s, p-CH3). Anal. Calcd for C48H45BORu: C, 76.89; H,
6.05. Found: C, 76.75; H 6.12. ΛM=49.8 Ω-1 mol-1 cm2.
Crystal Structure Determination of [Ru(η5-EtO-fluorenyl)(η6-
p-cymene)]BPh4 (3a). Intensity data sets were collected using a
Bruker SMART APEX 2 CCD diffractometer at RIAIDT-CAC-
TUS (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) using graphite-
monochromated Mo KR radiation (λ = 0.71073 A) at 293 K
and were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The
software APEX215 was used for collecting frames of data, indexing
Synthesis of Complexes. The compounds RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)
P [P=P(OEt)3, PPh(OEt)2, PiPr3] were prepared following the
method previously described.14
[RuCl(N2CAr1Ar2)(η6-p-cymene)P]BPh4 (1, 2) [Ar1=Ar2=
Ph (1); Ar1=Ph, Ar2=p-tolyl (2); P=PPh(OEt)2 (a), P(OEt)3
(b)]. In a 25 mL three-necked round-bottomed flask were placed
(11) Rabinowitz, R.; Pellon, J. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 4623–4626.
(12) (a) Smith, L. I.; Howard, K. L. Organic Syntheses; Wiley:
New York, 1955; Vol. III, p 351. (b) Miller, J. B. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24,
560. (c) Baltzly, R.; Mehta, N. B.; Russell, P. B.; Brooks, R. E.; Grivsky,
E. M.; Steinberg, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3669.
(13) Balacco, G. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1235–1241http://
(14) Albertin, G.; Antoniutti, S.; Castro, J.; Paganelli, S. Manuscript
in preparation.
(15) APEX2, v2.0-1; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, 2005.