A R T I C L E S
Lo et al.
has led to relatively efficient OLEDs with good CIE coordinates.
A key aspect of these studies has been the focus on small
molecules that require evaporation together with a host. This
places strict requirements on the properties of the host including
the ability to be evaporated, transport charge, and have a triplet
energy sufficiently high so as to not quench the luminescence.9
There is therefore a need for blue phosphorescent materials that
can be processed from solution for use in displays and lighting
applications.
of the dendron is above that of the core chromophore. However,
none of the dendrons reported thus far have been suitable for
devices containing saturated blue emissive iridium(III) com-
plexes either having too low a triplet energy leading to the
quenching of the luminescence, or giving dendrimers with
thermal properties not suitable for device fabrication.14,15
In this work we report the development of a new rigid high-
triplet-energy dendron that can be used to give a solution-
processable saturated blue phosphorescent dendrimer with a high
photoluminescence quantum yield. We show that when twisted
biphenyl-based dendrons are attached to the saturated blue
emissive core, fac-tris[1-methyl-5-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-n-propyl-
1H-[1,2,4]triazolyl]iridium(III) (1 in Figure 1), the properties
of the simple complex are significantly enhanced. We compare
the properties of the dendrimer 1 with the core complex 2, and
dendrimers with simple biphenyl 3 or diphenylethylene 4
dendrons and the same surface groups (Figure 1), and show
that not only are the photophysical properties improved but the
physical properties are now suitable for device fabrication.
Finally, we report the performance of single and bilayer devices
and describe the next challenges in materials development
required for efficient large-area devices containing solution-
processed deep blue phosphorescent materials.
One successful approach to solution processable phospho-
rescent materials has been the development of light-emitting
dendrimers. Phosphorescent light-emitting dendrimers generally
consist of a light-emitting core, dendrons (branches), and surface
groups, with the last playing the dominant role in the process-
ability of the materials. The dendrons that have been developed
for phosphorescent light-emitting dendrimers have fallen into
two categories: those that are electrically insulating10 and merely
play a structural role in controlling the intermolecular interac-
tions of the core, and those that are electroactive.11 In both cases
the precise control over the intercore distances means that the
emissive cores can be photophysically independent thus avoiding
interactions that lead to the quenching of the luminescence.12
However, the cores can still be sufficiently close to allow the
necessary charge transport in a device. This has made it possible
to use dendrimers to make highly efficient solution-processed
OLEDs with a neat light-emitting dendrimer layer, avoiding the
need for a host.13 The lack of a host material is attractive, both
from the point of view of simplifying device fabrication and
because finding suitable hosts for deep blue emission is
challenging. The development of deep blue phosphorescent
dendrimers places additional requirements on the properties of
the dendrons. In particular it is important that the triplet energy
Results and Discussion
To achieve the desired processing, thermal and photophysical
properties dendrimer 1 (Scheme 1) incorporates several impor-
tant design features: first, the fac-tris[1-methyl-5-(4-fluorophe-
nyl)-3-n-propyl-1H-[1,2,4]triazolyl]iridium(III) complex used as
the core emits blue phosphorescence with CIE coordinates in
solution of (0.16, 0.13). The photoluminescence (PL) peaks are
at 428 and 456 nm,8 which corresponds to energies of 2.9 and
2.7 eV, respectively. Second, the dendrons are composed of
tetrasubstituted phenyl rings, ensuring that adjacent phenyl rings
are twisted out of plane thus breaking the π-electron delocal-
ization. Molecular orbital calculations show that the chro-
mophores within the tetrasubstituted phenyl-based dendrons
have triplet energies of 3.4 eV, which is 0.5 eV higher in energy
than the emission of the core. The high triplet energy of the
chromophores within the dendrons should ensure that the PL
of the core is not quenched by the dendrons.14 Third, the
presence of the second generation and first generation dendrons
attached to the triazolyl and phenyl rings of the ligands
respectively, ensures that the emissive core is encapsulated by
the dendrons thus protecting it from intermolecular interactions
that can lead to quenching of the PL. Fourth, the rigid nature
of the dendrons will provide for a high glass transition
temperature (Tg), and finally, the 2-ethylhexyloxy surface groups
ensure solubility and that good-quality spin-coated films can
be formed.
(5) (a) Holmes, R. J.; D’Andrade, B. W.; Forrest, S. R.; Ren, X.; Li, J.;
Thompson, M. E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 3818. (b) Li, J.;
Djurovich, P. I.; Alleyne, B. D.; Yousufuddin, M.; Ho, N. N.; Thomas,
J. C.; Peters, J. C.; Bau, R.; Thompson, M. E. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44,
1713. (c) Coppo, P.; Plummer, E. A.; De Cola, L. Chem. Commun.
2004, 1774. (d) Yang, C.-H.; Cheng, Y.-M.; Chi, Y.; Hsu, C.-J.; Fang,
F.-C.; Wong, K.-T.; Chou, P.-T.; Chang, C.-H.; Tsai, M.-H.; Wu, C.-
C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2418. (e) Chang, C.-F.; Cheng,
Y.-M.; Chi, Y.; Chiu, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-C.; Lee, G.-H.; Chou, P.-T.; Chen,
C.-C.; Chang, C.-H.; Wu, C.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
4542.
(6) (a) Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Berner, D.; Rivier, S.;
Zuppiroli, L.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8790. (b)
Dedeian, K.; Shi, J.; Forsythe, E.; Morton, D. C.; Zavalij, P. Y. Inorg.
Chem. 2007, 46, 1603. (c) Di Censo, D.; Fantacci, S.; De Angelis, F.;
Klein, C.; Evans, N.; Kalyanasundaram, K.; Bolink, H. J.; Gra¨tzel,
M.; Nazzeeruddin, M. K. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 44, 980.
(7) (a) Sajoto, T.; Djurovich, P. I.; Tamayo, A.; Yousufuddin, M.; Bau,
R.; Thompson, M. E.; Holmes, R. J.; Forrest, S. R. Inorg. Chem. 2005,
44, 7992. (b) Holmes, R. J.; Forrest, S. R.; Saioto, T.; Tamayo, A.;
Djurovich, P. I.; Thompson, M. E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 243507.
(8) Lo, S.-C.; Shipley, C. P.; Bera, R. N.; Harding, R. E.; Cowley, A. R.;
Burn, P. L.; Samuel, I. D. W. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 5119.
(9) (a) Tokito, S.; Iijima, T.; Suzuri, Y.; Kita, H.; Tsuzuki, T.; Sato, F.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 569. (b) Ren, X.; Li, J.; Holmes, R. J.;
Djurovich, P. I.; Forrest, S. R.; Thompson, M. E. Chem. Mater. 2004,
16, 4743.
Synthesis. Our synthetic route to the dendrons and dendrimer
is shown in Scheme 1. The strategy involved the formation of
the elaborated [1-methyl-5-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-n-propyl-1H-
[1,2,4]triazolyl] ligand with three bromine groups (19) available
for attachment to a first generation dendron 18 with a boronic
acid at its focus.
We will first discuss the synthesis of the tribromo triazole ligand
19 and then the first generation boronic acid focused dendron 18
and finally the dendrimer formation. The key step in the synthe-
(10) Lo, S.-C.; Namdas, E. B.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel, I. D. W. Macromol-
ecules 2003, 36, 9721.
(11) (a) Lo, S.-C.; Namdas, E. B.; Shipley, C. P.; Markham, J. P. J.;
Anthopolous, T. D.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel, I. D. W. Org. Electron.
2006, 7, 85. (b) Knights, K. A.; Stevenson, S. G.; Shipley, C. P.; Lo,
S.-C.; Olsen, S.; Harding, R. E.; Gambino, S.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel,
I. D. W. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 2121.
(12) (a) Adronov, A.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1701. (b)
Lo, S.-C.; Burn, P. L. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 1097. (c) Burn, P. L.;
Lo, S.-C.; Samuel, I. D. W. AdV. Mater. 2007, 19, 1675.
(13) Lo, S.-C.; Anthopoulos, T. D.; Namdas, E. B.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel,
I. D. W. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 1945.
(14) Lo, S.-C.; Bera, R. N.; Harding, R. E.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel, I. D. W.
AdV. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 3080.
(15) Lo, S.-C.; Harding, R. E.; Brightman, E.; Burn, P. L.; Samuel, I. D. W.
J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3213.
9
16682 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 46, 2009