Scheme 1
.
Reported Acid-Catalyzed Cyclization of Sorbitol
Scheme 2. Literature Synthesis of Tetrahydroxyoxepanes
Recent work in our laboratory includes an investigation
into the role of alcohol additives with conducting polymers,
and their ability to significantly enhance conductivity. As
part of that investigation, we examined the reaction of
sorbitol and other polyhydric alcohols with acid. Sorbitol is
an important additive to conducting polymers, and the
literature is clear in terms of the acid-catalyzed cyclization
reactions. In a synthesis of C2-symmetric diphosphinite
ligands derived from carbohydrates by Diaz, Castillo´n, and
co-workers, heating sorbitol (1, also known as D-glucitol)
with tosic acid in xylene led to a mixture of products.
Subsequent treatment with acetone and acid, separation and
purification, and then passage through an ion exchange
column led to 2,5-anhydro-L-iditol (2) in a low 5% yield.12
An identical experiment was reported in a synthesis of linear,
branched, and cyclic oligoglycerol derivatives, and when
sorbitol was heated with methanesulfonic acid with isolation
procedures similar to those reported by Diaz and Castillo´n,
a 3% yield of 2 was obtained and it was suggested that 1,5-
anhydrohexitrol and 1,4-anhydrohexitol (sorbitan) were
produced as minor products.13 The presence of these latter
products was inferred from previous work without further
proof. In these and other studies, the only reported products
were five- and six-membered ring ethers, with no mention
of oxepane derivatives.
Although direct cyclization of sorbitol to an oxepane has
not been reported in the literature, there is a multistep
synthesis of tetrahydroxyoxepanes from either sorbitol or
mannitol. Starting with sorbitol (1), the fully protected
triisopropylidene 3 was prepared and then reacted with HCl
in MeOH to yield 4. This 3,4-isopropylidene product was
formed in only 27% yield as a mixture of the different
isomers, presumably separated by recrystallization. The
primary alcohol moieties were converted to the tosylates,
resulting in 5. The yield was about 50% and the product
decomposed quickly, requiring that it be used immediately.
Compound 5 reacted with sodium methoxide in CHCl3 to
yield the bis(epoxide) product 6 in a yield of 81%. Finally
reaction with NaOH at approximately 55 °C for 10 h was
followed by saturation with carbon dioxide to a pH of 8 and
purification by slow recrystallization for several days to give
the targeted tetrahydroxyoxepane, 7 (1,6-anhydrosorbitol),
in very poor yield.14 Stereochemistry is shown only for 1
and 7, but the sequence produced enantiopure 7.14
Given the literature precedent, we were surprised to find
that the reaction of sorbitol with 1% triflic acid in toluene at
reflux gave a single isolated product in high yield. Initially,
we anticipated that five- or six-membered ring anhydro
sugars were formed.15 Initial attempts to derivatize the
unknown product by formation of the corresponding ac-
etonide, by reaction with acetone and acid or with dimethox-
ypropane and acid, failed to give an isolable product. We
therefore prepared a derivative using an excess of 3-fluo-
robenzoyl chloride to properly identify the product.16 Proton
NMR showed that the derivative was too symmetrical relative
to products reported in the literature. The derivative did not
have a hydroxymethyl unit, clearly indicating that our initial
expectation was incorrect.15b Careful NMR analysis of the
anhydro sugar product showed it to be a tetra(3-fluoroben-
zoate) derivative of an oxepane, 1,6-anhydrosorbitol (7).17
Once the product was identified, determination of a yield
was possible, and the conversion of 1 to 7 proceeded in 86%
yield. This assignment resolved structural issues for the acid-
catalyzed reaction. We next examined the reaction of
D-mannitol (8) with triflic acid in refluxing toluene and
obtained a product in 89% yield that was clearly different
than the reaction with sorbitol and proved to be tetrahy-
droxyoxepane 9 (1,6-anhydromannitol).
In our acid-catalyzed reactions of 1 and 8, the stereo-
chemistry of the hydroxyl units in 7 and 9 were apparently
retained. To confirm this, we prepared a synthetic standard
(14) (a) Vargha, L.; Kasztreiner, E. Chem. Ber. 1960, 93, 1608–1616.
(b) Vargha, L.; Kasztreiner, E. Chem. Ber. 1959, 92, 2506–2515.
(15) (a) ORGN 101, Chemical Reactivity of Poly(ethylenedioxy)-
thiophene (PEDOT), Smith, M. B.; Sotzing, G. A.; Onorato, A.; Kumar,
A.; Delude, C. 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, September
10, 2006. 234th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA, August 20, 2007. (b)
ORGN 359, The Chemical Reactivity Of Sorbitol With PEDOT; Onorato,
A.; Navarathne, D.; Smith, M. B.; Sotzing, G. A.
(11) See for example, McDonald, F. E.; Wang, X.; Do, N.; Hardcastle,
K. I. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2917–2919.
(16) Yang, J.; Morton, M. D.; Hill, D. W.; Grant, D. F. Chem. Phys.
Lipids 2006, 140, 75–87.
(12) Aghmiz, M.; Aghmiz, A.; D´ıaz, Y.; Masdeu-Bulto´, A.; Claver, C.;
Castillo´n, S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7502–7510. Also see: Giacometti, J.;
Milin, C.; Wolf, N.; Giacometti, F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 3950–
3954.
(17) (a) Soha´r, P.; Vargha, L.; Kasztreiner, E. Tetrahedron 1964, 20,
647–653. (b) Vargha, L.; Kasztreiner, E. Chem. Ber. 1960, 93, 1608–1616.
(18) (a) Cohen, N.; Banner, B. L.; Laurenzano, A. J.; Carozza, L. Org.
Synth. Coll. Vol. 7 1990, 297–302. (b) Inoue, T.; Kitagawa, O.; Oda, Y.;
Taguchi, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8256–8263.
(13) Cassel, S.; Debaig, C.; Benvegnu, T.; Chaimbault, P.; Lafosse, M.;
Plusquellec, D.; Rollin, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 87, 5–896.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009
3723