mide-type activators in combination with Lewis acids such
as the PhSNPhth-TMSOTf,11 EtSNPhth-TrB(C6F5)4,12 and
N-(phenylthio)-ꢀ-caprolactam-Tf2O13 systems have also
been proposed. More recently the list of organosulfur
compounds activating thioglycosides was further expanded
by using various sulfinates in admixture with triflic anhy-
dride.14 These sulfinates include S-(4-methoxyphenyl)ben-
zenethiosulfinate,15 benzenesulfinyl-piperidine (BSP),16 di-
phenyl sulfoxide,17 and benzenesulfinyl-morpholine.18
An attractive feature of some of these promoter systems
containing sulfinyl derivatives lies in their power, glycosyl-
ation successfully being performed at low temperatures.
Nevertheless, as most of these sulfinyl derivatives are not
commercially available,19 improvement of their synthetic
accessibility, as well as their stability and solubility, is
desired.20
Scheme 1. Glycosylation of a Primary Hydroxyl Using
Me2S2-Tf2O
and 2.0 equiv of Me2S2-Tf2O, the yields of 5 were 55%,
72%, 79%, and 79%, respectively. These results indicate that
a stoichiometric amount of the promoter is needed, and in
subsequent work a 1.5-fold excess of the reagent was used.
We were interested in developing a powerful promoter
system for the activation of thioglycosides that could be used
at low temperatures and at the same time use commercially
available inexpensive chemicals. We hypothesized that, by
analogy with the preparation of DMTST, dimethyl disulfide
might react not only with methyl triflate but also with triflic
anhydride. The primary product of this reaction could be
expected to be more reactive than DMTST as one of the
methyl groups of DMTST would be replaced by the strongly
electron-withdrawing trifluoromethanesulfonyl group. Al-
though in the literature we found no data on the reaction of
disulfides with sulfonic acid anhydrides, an NMR-tube
experiment clearly showed that dimethyl disulfide reacts with
triflic anhydride in a fast reaction.
Scheme 2. Effect of the Amount of Promoter on Yield
The thioglycoside activating capability of the dimethyl
disulfide-triflic anhydride (Me2S2-Tf2O) reagent was tested
by the reaction of the benzoylated thioglycoside (1) with the
D-glucose acceptor (2) having a primary hydroxyl group free
(Scheme 1). The reaction was complete in 10 min at 0 °C
and afforded the disaccharide (3) in 93% yield.
The amount of the reagent required for promoting glyco-
sylations was studied on the coupling of 1 with the
D-glucosamine derivative 4 (Scheme 2). Using 0.5, 1.0, 1.5,
Some of the essential reaction conditions having been
established, the scope of this new glycosylation reaction was
investigated by using a variety of different glycosyl donors
and acceptors (Table 1).
Me2S2-Tf2O-promoted glycosylations of thioglycosides
on secondary hydroxyls proceeded easily. Reactions of 1 with
the D-glucose derivatives 6, 8, and 10 (entries 1-3) having
a free hydroxyl group at the C-4, C-3, and C-2 positions,
respectively, were performed at -40 °C and afforded the
disaccharides 7, 9, and 11 within a few minutes. As can be
seen from Table 1, the promoter activates glycosyl donors
not only from neutral monosaccharides of different configu-
rations (D-gluco, D-galacto, L-ido, D-manno) but the amino-
sugar (12) and the uronic acid (14) thioglycosides as well.
Several of the acceptors had the 4-OH group free, to which
generally low reactivity is attributed. The yields obtained
with these acceptors (entries 1, 5, 7-11) indicate that the
low reactivity of the 4-OH group was readily overcome by
the power of the activation method. The thioglycoside donors
had the most frequently used aglycons (Me, Et, Ph); they
all reacted equally well, irrespective of their aglycon. The
reagent and the reaction conditions are compatible with most
of the commonly used protecting groups. In the case of
reactants containing the acid-sensitive acetal and tert-butyl
groups (entries 2, 3, 5, 9, 10), the reaction mixture was
buffered by 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine. The disarmed
thioglycosides in Table 1 invariably afforded trans-glycosides
as a result of neighboring group participation.
(7) (a) Fu¨gedi, P.; Garegg, P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 149, C9-C12.
(b) Andersson, F.; Fu¨gedi, P.; Garegg, P. J.; Nashed, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 3919-3922. (c) Fu¨gedi, P. In E-EROS, Electronic Encyclopedia
of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L. A., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience,
(8) Dasgupta, F.; Garegg, P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 177, C13-C17.
(9) (a) Martichonok, V.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
1702-1706. (b) Crich, D.; Sun, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8321-8348.
(10) Ito, Y.; Ogawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1061-1064.
(11) Shimizu, H.; Ito, Y.; Ogawa, T. Synlett 1994, 535-536.
(12) Jona, H.; Takeuchi, K.; Saitoh, T.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 2000,
1178-1179.
(13) Duro´n, S. G.; Polat, T.; Wong, C.-H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 839-841.
(14) For a review on the use of sulfoxides and sulfinates as donors and
promoters, see: Crich, D.; Lim, L. B. L. Org. React. 2004, 64, 115-251.
We thank one of the reviewers for drawing our attention to this publication.
(15) Crich, D.; Smith, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4067-4069.
(16) Crich, D.; Smith, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015-9020.
(17) Code´e, J. D. C.; Litjens, R. E. J. N.; den Heeten, R.; Overkleeft, H.
S.; van Boom, J. H.; van der Marel, G. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1519-1522.
(18) Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Huang, X.; Zhang, L.-H.; Ye, X.-S. Synlett
2006, 2846-2850.
(19) Diphenyl sulfoxide is commercial. We thank one of the reviewers
informing us that BSP also became commercially avialable recently.
(20) Crich, D.; Banerjee, A.; Li, W.; Yao, Q. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2005,
24, 415-424.
4648
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 22, 2007