Jankowiak and Kaszynski
JOCArticle
Correlation between the experimental excitation energies
-
and the σp substituent parameter in Figure 2 permits an
estimate of the λmax for unknown derivatives of 1. Thus, λmax
for 1n (X=NO2) is predicted at 430 nm in MeCN. A value of
413 nm is predicted for the same derivative 1n on the basis of
ZINDO results and the correlation in Figure 6. However,
this value seems too low considering that λmax for 1f (X =
-
CN) is 415 nm. Derivative 1 with the MeSO2 group (σp
=
1.13)22 in the 4 position has a predicted λmax value of 421 nm,
and the CF3SO2 group (σp- = 1.63),22 which is one of the
most electron-withdrawing substituent, shifts the πCS
π*ring absorption to 452 nm, according to Figure 2.
f
The presented results demonstrate synthetic methods for
the preparation of substituted 1-hydroxypyridine-2(1H)-
thiones, offer basic understanding of the photophysical
processes, and provide a predictive tool for designing
N-acyloxy derivatives with desired light sensitivity.
FIGURE 8. Correlation of the excitation energy Eexc (B3LYP/
cc-pVDZ) for the nCS f π*ring transition in 2 and the substituent
parameter σp-. Eexc = 2.98 - 0.66σp-, r2 = 0.92.
Computational Details
Quantum-mechanical calculations were carried out with
the Gaussian 98 suite of programs.28 Geometry optimizations
were undertaken by using the B3LYP functional29,30 with the
6-311G(d,p) basis set,31 default convergence limits, and without
symmetry constraints. Vibrational frequencies were used to
characterize the nature of the stationary points. Vertical elec-
tronic excitation energies for esters 2 were obtained by employ-
ing the TD-DFT method32 and using the B3LYP functional29,30
with the 6-311G(d,p)31 or cc-pVDZ33 basis sets. Excitation
energies for 2 were also obtained at their DFT determined
geometries by using the INDO/2 algorithm (ZINDO)34 as
supplied in the Cerius2 suite of programs and including all
electrons and orbitals in the CI. ZINDO calculations with the
solvation model (Self Consistent Reaction Field) used cavity
radii derived from the DFT calculations with the VOLUME
keyword.
sensitive to the substituent in the 4-position and varies from
333 nm for RO to 415 nm for CN. As a consequence, the
esters have differential sensitivity to light: the cyano deriva-
tive 1f undergoes photoinduced transformation about
20 times faster than the alkoxy derivative 1b under the
same conditions. The position of the higher energy absorp-
tion band at about 295 nm is practically substituent inde-
pendent. Both bands exhibit a modest negative solvato-
chromic effect.
Analysis of the TD-DFT and ZINDO results revealed the
electronic structure and the nature of the observed electronic
excitations in series 1. In general, our results are consistent
with those of previous computational studies of nitro and
fluoro derivatives of 1-methoxypyridine-2(1H)-thione.12
They demonstrate that the substituent in the 4-position
strongly affects the energy level of the LUMO (π*ring) and
consequently the position of the absorption maxima of two
lowest energy transitions: the unobserved nCS f π*ring and
the observed πCS f π*ring. Out of the two transitions, the
latter appears to have the dominant effect on the photo-
Experimental Section
Melting points are uncorrected. 1H NMR and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded at 300 and 75 MHz, respectively, in
CDCl3, unless specified otherwise. Chemical shifts were refer-
enced to the solvent (CHCl3 set at 7.26 and 77.0 ppm). UV
spectra were recorded in CH3CN and cyclohexane. Molar
stability of the ester. The experimentally unobserved nCS
f
π*ring transition has a significantly lower absorption coeffi-
cient and is predicted to appear >390 nm for all esters in
series 1, which suggests similar weak sensitivity to visible
light for all members of the series. Further analysis of the
series 2 revealed that the 4-RO substituent exerts the nearly
maximum effect on increasing the excitation energy (largest
blue shift) and hence provides the maximum photostabiliza-
tion for esters in series 1. A similar position of the absorption
maximum and consequently photostability can be expected
for the 4-NMe2 derivative 1k.
Computational results are moderately useful as a tool for
the prediction of excitation energies. The TD-DFT method
has a problem with good reproduction of energies for the
electron-deficient species such as 1f and 1g (Figure 6) and the
magnitude of the oscillator strength. In contrast, the ZIN-
DO//DFT method performs better and provides a better
correlation with all experimental results, despite a more
narrow range of computed excitation energies (the slope of
the correlation line is 0.37). The best predictive tool, how-
ever, appears to be the Hammett-type correlation shown in
Figure 2.
(28) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A.
D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi,
M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.;
Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.;
Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.;
Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian 98, Revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(29) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652.
(30) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789.
(31) (a) McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639–
5648. (b) Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys.
1980, 72, 650–654.
(32) (a) Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454–
464. (b) Stratmann, R. E.; Scuseria, G. E.; Frisch, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998,
109, 8218–8224.
(33) (a) Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1358–
1371. (b) Dunning, T. H. Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007–1023.
(34) Zerner, M. C. In Reviews of Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz,
K. B. Boyd, D. B., Eds.; VCH Publishing: New York, 1991; Vol. 2,
pp 313-366 and references cited therein.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 19, 2009 7447