pentacene7 because of the still low accessibility and high
sensitivity in the presence of oxygen particularly in dilute
solution. In this respect, attachment of substituents at the
most sensitive 7,14-position of 2a possessing the largest
HOMO coefficients would substantially enhance its kinetic
stability as in the case of large acenes.7a In this connection,
and in view of the interest inherent in the hitherto unknown
dehydroannulene 1 itself, we report here the first synthesis
and structural characterization of 1 and its transformation
into stable 7,14-disubstituted zethrene derivatives 2b and 2c
based on an electrophile-induced transannular cyclization of
1.
8-iodonaphthalene (5a),1b,c under standard Sonogashira-
Hagihara conditions at room temperature. Although a trace
1
amount of 1 was detected in the H NMR spectra of the
products, the major products were unidentified oligomeric
products derived from random coupling and the results lacked
reproducibility too. Next, we adopted cross-coupling ac-
companying in situ desilylation.9 The optimization results
are summarized in Table 1. After several trials, the best result
was obtained when the coupling reaction of 3 and 4b was
undertaken in the presence of 1 equiv of aqueous NaOH,
furnishing 1 in 22% yield together with monoiodozethrene
2d1a (4%) (entry 5). In the absence of NaOH, the reaction
terminated at the stage of single coupling product 61a (entry
4). To the contrary, desilylation-coupling reaction of iodo-
ethynyl derivative 5b under similar conditions did not give
the desired product 1, resulting in recovery of the starting
material (entries 1 and 2).10 However, the use of powerful
desilylation reagent (TBAF) was not useful (entries 3 and
6). It is worth noting that 1 is easily handled without any
visible decomposition at room temperature, in contrast to
the structurally resembled compounds such as
tetradehydro[10]annulene11
and
dinaphtho-8
and
diacenaphthooctadehydro[14]annulenes.12 The aromatic pro-
tons of 1 resonate at 7.80 (dd), 7.71 (dd), and 7.45 (dd) ppm,
indicating that 1 does not exhibit 10π aromaticity.13 In accord
with this observation, the NICS value (+1.45) at the center
of the 10π system of 1 suggests its nonaromatic character.14
Compound 1 exhibits strong fluorescence at 422 and 448
nm with a quantum yield of 0.91 as shown in Figure 1 and
Table S1 (Supporting Information).
Table 1. In-situ Desilylation and Pd(0)/Cu(I)-catalyzed Coupling
Reactions of 5b or 3 and 4ba
An X-ray crystallographic structure analysis of 1 (Figure
2) showed that the bond lengths and bond angles of its
[10]annulene framework are in good agreement with the
starting
entry material(s)
calculated values.14 As expected from the H NMR study,
1
additive
H2Ob
products (yieldf)
no reactiong
the [10]annulene framework of 1 clearly exhibits bond length
alternation (Table S2, Supporting Information). The acetylene
units are almost linear with bending angles of less than 5°
and the π-conjugated backbone is distinctly planar. The
crystal packing structure revealed that π-π stacking interac-
tions of the two naphthalene units lead to the formation of
a dimeric unit, which contacts with two neighboring dimeric
units by π-π stacking and CH/π interactions, respectively,
furnishing an alignment classified as sandwich-herringbone.15
1
2
3
4
5
6
5b
5b
5b
3 and 4b
3 and 4b
3 and 4b
NaOH/H2Oc no reactiong
TBAFd
H2Ob
2d (6%)
1 (6%), 2d (trace), 6 (33%)
NaOH/H2Oc 1 (22%), 2d (4%)
TBAFe
2a (<3%)
a General reaction conditions: A solution of starting material(s) (0.23
mmol (each), 1 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.2 equiv), CuI (0.2 equiv), DBU (2
equiv), and additive in benzene (ca. 8 mL) was stirred at rt for 4-8 h. b
A
few drops. c NaOH (1 equiv)/H2O (0.1 mL). d One equivalent of a solution
of TBAF in THF. e Two equivalents of a solution of TBAF in THF. f Isolated
yield. g Most of starting material 5b was recovered.
(9) In-situ desilylation and Pd(0)/Cu(I)-catalyzed coupling methods were
reported previously: (a) Mio, M. J.; Kopel, L. C.; Braun, J. B.; Gadzikwa,
T. L.; Hull, K. L.; Brisbois, R. G.; Markworth, C. J.; Grieco, P. A. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3199–3202. (b) Wan, W. B.; Kimball, D. B.; Haley, M. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6795–6798.
For the synthesis of 1, we planned to use the Sonogashira-
Hagihara reaction that can be performed at ambient temper-
ature to form the C(sp)-C(sp2) bonds of 1. First, we examined
the reactions of terminal acetylene derivatives with iodides,
that is, coupling of 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (3) with 1,8-
diethynylnaphthalene (4a)1c,8 and self-coupling of 1-ethynyl-
(10) We do not understand the reason for the innertness of 5b under
the basic conditions.
(11) Myers, A. G.; Finney, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10986–
10987.
(12) Palmer, G. J.; Parkin, S. R.; Anthony, J. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 2509–2512.
(13) For example, the aromatic protons of 1,8-diethynylnaphthalene (4a)
resonate at 7.85-7.80 (m, 4H) and 7.42 (dd, 2H) ppm (300 MHz, CDCl3).
(14) The structure optimization was carried out by DFT method with
the B3LYP/6-31G(d) basis-set and the NICS value was calculated by GIAO-
HF/6-31G(d) using Gaussian 03.
(7) For recent reviews, see: (a) Anthony, J. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 452–483. (b) Ruiz, R.; Choudhary, D.; Nickel, B.; Toccoli, T.;
Chang, K.-C.; Mayer, A. C.; Clancy, P.; Blakely, J. M.; Headrick, R. L.;
Iannotta, S.; Malliaras, G. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4497–4508. (c) Katz,
H. E. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4748–4756.
(15) (a) Desiraju, G. R.; Gavezzotti, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1989, 621–623. (b) Gavezzotti, A.; Desiraju, G. R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect.
B 1988, 44, 427–434.
(8) Mitchell, R. H.; Sondheimer, F. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1397–1405
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4105