Having key intermediates 4 and 5a/b in hand, coupling of
these fragments was required to obtain linear peptides 3a and
3b (Scheme 4). To this end, amide formation was performed
utilizing EDC, HOBt and DMAP. Coupling of 5a to 4 gave
the linear carbamate 3a in moderate yield (24%). Fortunately,
coupling of 5b with 4 proceeded significantly better so
that linear amide 3b was produced in a yield of 54% after
purification by counter-current chromatography.
improvement of the kinetic parameters may be achieved by
changing the Pro-Gly sequence and/or the alkyl spacer-length
of the cyclic peptide. Moreover, other challenging strategies to
construct the cyclic peptide involve coupling of the azide and
alkyne fragments via CuAAC, and/or by invoking strain-
promoted (Cu-free) 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition approaches,
followed by an intramolecular lactamization reaction.
These are all strategies currently under investigation in our
laboratories.
Copper-catalysed macrocyclisation of 3a or 3b was pursued
applying modified literature procedures. Since we anticipated
that elevated temperatures could well result in decomposition
of compounds 3a and 3b, our attention was focused on
intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition at relatively low
temperatures15 and under high dilution (o0.001 M).
Unfortunately, the different conditions applied on either 3a
or 3b (see ESIw) failed to produce sufficient quantities of
the desired macrocycle for adequate purification and identifi-
cation. Since Cu strongly coordinates to the basic guanidine
moiety, and thus hampers purification and possibly also
cyclisation, compound 3b was Boc-protected at the guanidine
prior to macrocyclisation (Scheme 4). Addition of four
equivalents of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate resulted in the forma-
tion of three products (i.e. mono-, di- and trisubstituted
guanidine), of which the bis-Boc-protected compound 15
appeared to be the major product (50%).
The authors thank Prof. H. C. Hemker and Dr R. Wagenvoord
(Synapse BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands) for their contri-
bution and useful discussions. These investigations were
supported with financial aid from the Netherlands Technology
Foundation (STW).
Notes and references
1 H. C. Hemker, P. Giesen, R. Al Dieri, V. Regnault, E. de Smedt,
R. Wagenvoord, T. Lecompte and S. Beguin, Pathophysiol.
Haemost. Thromb., 2003, 33, 4.
2 M. K. Ramjee, Anal. Biochem., 2000, 277, 11.
3 H. D. Shine, L. Hertz, J. de Vellis and B. Haber, Neurochem. Res.,
1981, 6, 453.
4 S. S. van Berkel, Thrombin Generation: Molecules and Tools,
PhD-Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2008.
5 J. S. Davies, Amino Acids, Pept. Proteins, 2003, 34, 149.
6 (a) Y. Shao, W. Lu and S. B. H. Kent, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
3911; (b) L. Zhang and J. P. Tam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
3311; (c) J. T. Lundquist IV and J. C. Pelletier, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
3219.
7 (a) S. J. Miller, H. E. Blackwell and R. H. Grubbs, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 9606; (b) U. Kazmaier, C. Hebach, A. Watzke,
S. Maier, H. Mues and V. Huch, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 136;
(c) N. Ghalit, J. Kemmink, H. W. Hilbers, C. Versluis, D. T. S.
Rijkers and R. M. J. Liskamp, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 924;
(d) J. Illsinghe, C. Xing Guo, R. Garland, A. Ahmed, B. van
Lierop, J. Elaridi, W. R. Jackson and A. J. Robinson, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 295.
8 (a) W. D. F. Meutermans, S. W. Golding, G. T. Bourne,
L. P. Miranda, M. J. Dooley, P. F. Alewood and M. L. Smythe,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9790; (b) V. M. F. Cardona,
O. Hartley and P. Botti, J. Pept. Res., 2003, 61, 152;
(c) H. Bieraugel, H. E. Schoemaker, H. Hiemstra and J. H. van
Maarseveen, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 1830.
9 For reviews, see: (a) J. E. Moses and A. D. Moorhouse, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2007, 36, 1249; (b) A. J. Dirks, J. J. L. M. Cornelissen,
F. L. van Delft, J. C. M. van Hest, R. J. M. Nolte, A. E. Rowan
and F. P. J. T. Rutjes, QSAR Comb. Sci., 2007, 26, 1200;
(c) M. Meldal and C. W. Tornøe, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2952.
10 Y. L. Angell and K. Burgess, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1674.
11 (a) H. C. Kolb and K. B. Sharpless, Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8,
1128; (b) W. S. Horne, C. D. Stout and M. R. Ghadiri, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9372; (c) W. S. Horne, M. K. Yadav,
C. D. Stout and M. R. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
15366.
12 (a) K. Oh and Z. Guan, Chem. Commun., 2006, 3069;
(b) Y. L. Angell and K. Burgess, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 9595.
13 (a) J. H. van Maarseveen, W. S. Horne and M. R. Ghadiri, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 4503; (b) V. D. Bock, R. Perciaccante, T. P. Jansen,
H. Hiemstra and J. H. van Maarseveen, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 919;
(c) V. D. Bock, D. Speijer, H. Hiemstra and J. H. van Maarseveen,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 971.
14 (a) S. Punna, J. Kuzelka, Q. Wang and M. G. Finn, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2215; (b) R. A. Turner, A. G. Oliver and
R. S. Lokey, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 5011; (c) V. Goncalves,
B. Gautier, A. Regazzetti, P. Coric. S. Bouaziz, C. Garbay,
M. Vidal and N. Inguimbert, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007,
17, 5590.
Gratifyingly, subjecting 15 to Cu-catalysed ring-closing
conditions (i.e. CuBr/TMEDA, THF, 40 1C, 7 h) resulted in
the formation of the macrocyclic fluorophore-containing
tripeptide 16 in an encouraging 23% yield.
Next, the kinetic parameters of both the linear and cyclic
peptide were determined by constructing Michaelis–Menten
and Lineweaver–Burk plots from which the binding constant
(KM) and the hydrolysis rate (kcat) were determined (see ESIw).
Comparing the binding affinity of the linear (1) and cyclic
peptide (2b) showed a significant reduction (KM = 746.9 mM
and 3693.9 mM, respectively). Calculations of kcat showed only
a slight decrease for the cyclic peptide 2b as compared to the
linear peptide 1 (kcat = 23.3 sÀ1 and 29.3 sÀ1, respectively), but
nevertheless remained high. Visual analysis of the turbidity of
the samples after hydrolysis by thrombin, as a measure for the
sedimentation of AMC, showed a clear difference between the
cyclic and linear peptide. While the samples containing high
concentrations of linear peptide 1 (4800 mM) clearly became
turbid, no turbidity at these concentrations was observed for
cyclic peptide 2b, thus indicating an improved solubility of
AMC as a result of its linkage to the hydrophilic peptide
backbone.
In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated that
Cu-catalysed macrocyclisation of an azide- and alkyne-
containing linear peptide resulted in a cyclic fluorogenic
tripeptide. Biological evaluation of both the linear and cyclic
peptide demonstrated that the latter had improved kinetic
properties. The macrocyclic (bulky) shape of the cyclic peptide
indeed resulted in a five-fold increase of the binding constant
(KM) as compared to the linear peptide, but the hydrolysis rate
(kcat) remained high. It clearly shows, however, the feasibility
of this unprecedented cyclisation strategy to improve the
kinetic properties of the fluorescent substrate. Further
15 T.-S. Hu, R. Tannert, H.-D. Arndt and H. Waldmann, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 3942.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
4274 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 4272–4274