within either ring-strained or strain-free systems, have been
found to undergo carbon-carbon bond fragmentation.7
Recently, we investigated the reaction of SmI2 with a series
of R-aminomethyl malonates, a type of strain-free substrate
containing a quaternary carbon center adjacent to the
alkoxycarbonyl groups. Upon treatment with freshly prepared
SmI2 (1.1 equiv), approximately 50% of diester 1a was
converted into 2a within 20 min (Table 1, entry 1), through
Table 2. SmI2-Mediated Carbon-Carbon Bond Fragmentation of 1
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions with 1a
entry
SmI2 (equiv)
time
yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
1.1
2.0
2.2
5.0
20 minb
20 minb
2 h
ca. 50c
88
94
a Isolated yield. b SmI2 (5 equiv) was added while the substrate was heated
in THF, and the mixture was then heated at reflux for an additional 0.5 h.
2 h
87
a Isolated yield. b The reaction mixture turned from blue to yellow after
about 20 min, indicating that SmI2 was completely consumed. c Estimated
yield based on a TLC analysis.
derivatives (dibenzyl, dimethyl, or diethyl malonates, or a
lactone) underwent clean and smooth fragmentation to form
the corresponding products in good to excellent yields
(74-94%, entries 1-5, 7, 8, and 10). (iii) The presence of
the amino group is necessary for the success of the reaction.
For example, it can be a dimethylamino, diethylamino,
dibenzylamino, piperidinyl, morpholinyl, or anilino group.
No reaction occurred in the case of amide 1i (entry 9), and
a messy mixture was generated from ammonium 1f (entry
6). In addition, as demonstrated by further studies, replace-
ment of the amino group with an iodo, ethoxy, or phenyl
did not bring about the desired fragmentation. (iv) While
tertiary amine substrates reacted readily at room temperature,
a secondary amine counterpart 1h (entry 8) required both
harsher reaction conditions and extra SmI2 to secure a useful
transformation.
a new and intriguing type of carbon-carbon bond fragmen-
tation. If the quantity of SmI2 was increased to 2.0 equiv,
the reaction was complete in 20 min, affording 2a in 88%
yield (entry 2). When the substrate was treated with more
SmI2 (2.2 and 5.0 equiv) for longer reaction time (2 h), the
yields were found to be 94% and 87%, respectively (entries
3 and 4). Therefore, the quantity of SmI2 and the reaction
time were fixed at 2.2 equiv and 2 h, respectively, for most
of the subsequent experiments.
To examine the generality and scope of the SmI2-mediated
carbon-carbon bond fragmentation method, a series of
R-aminomethyl malonates8 were scrutinized (Table 2). The
following observations have been made. (i) The R1 group in
1 (Table 2) can be a methyl, a benzyl, or a methylene within
a lactone ring. (ii) Except for 1f and 1i, all malonate
The current fragmentation seems to proceed via a free
radical reaction pathway. To collect pertinent evidence, the
following experiment was executed. As shown in Scheme 1,
(5) For examples of SmI2-promoted C-C bond in ring-strain systems,
see: (a) Lange, G. L.; Gottardo, C.; Merica, A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
6738. (b) Lange, G. L.; Merica, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7897. (c)
Lange, G. L.; Furlan, L.; MacKinnon, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
5489. (d) Lange, G. L.; Gottardo, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6607. (e)
Comins, D. L.; Zheng, X. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2681. (f)
Molander, G. A.; McKie, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4112. (g) Batey,
R. A.; Motherwell, W. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6649. (h) Beerli, R.;
Bruner, E. J.; Broschberg, H. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6449. (i) Hwang,
J. T.; Liao, C. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6583.
Scheme 1. Reaction of 1b with 1.2 Equiv of SmI2
(6) (a) Ananthanarayan, T. P.; Gallagher, T.; Magnus, P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1982, 709. (b) Honda, T.; Naito, K.; Yamane, S.; Suzuki,
Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1218. (c) Molander, G. A.; Etter,
J. B.; Zinke, P. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 453.
(7) (a) Haque, A.; Ghosh, S. Chem. Commun. 1997, 2039. (b) Williams,
D. B. G.; Blann, K.; Holzapfel, C. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001,
219. (c) Camps, P.; Lukach, A. E.; Vazquez, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2419.
(8) Compounds 1a-g and 1j were prepared according to: (a) Miller,
R. B.; Smith, B. F. Synth. Commun. 1973, 3, 359. Compound 1h was
prepared according to: (b) Desai, P.; Schildknegt, K.; Agrios, K. A.;
Mossman, C.; Milligan, G. L.; Aube, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7226.
The detailed preparation for these compounds can also be found in the
Supporting Information.
careful addition of SmI2 (1.2 equiv) to a solution of compound
1b in THF did provide the homocoupling product 3b (63%) in
addition to the fragmentation product 2a (57%). Successful
isolation of dimer 3b has thus confirmed our hypothesis that
the reaction involves free radical intermediates.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4137