Scheme 1
.
Au-Catalyzed Hydrofluorination of Alkynes
Scheme 2.
Ester-Directed Hydrofluorination of Alkynesa
Modest regioselectivity for alkyl/aryl alkyne substrates was
improved by adding electron-withdrawing groups to the
aromatic ring substituents. Although other alkyne hydroha-
logenations using Au catalysis have been reported, these
reactions utilize electrophilic halogen sources, for the most
part excluding fluorine.10 Also, the substrate scope of these
reactions has been limited to propargyl acetates.
Given our interest in fluoroolefins as mechanistic probes,6
we sought to expand the methodology for Au-catalyzed
nucleophilic fluorination of alkynes by developing new
avenues for regiocontrol that would expand both the utility
and substrate scope of the reaction. Specifically, we envi-
sioned a classical heteroatom-directed reaction that might
confer a high degree of selectivity for a broad range of
substrates.11 Here we report the realization of this design in
the carbonyl-directed hydrofluorination of alkynes under Au(I)
catalysis. We demonstrate that this concept is broadly applicable
and engenders regioselectivities that exceed those originally
reported for this reaction system. As such, this methodology
could facilitate access to new compounds for fundamental
research and the development of pharmaceuticals.
We commenced our investigations by examining ester 1.
We were intrigued to observe that hydrofluorination of this
substrate under the conditions in eq 1 (Scheme 1) exclusively
yielded Z-products as a 40:60 mixture of regioisomers 2a
and 2b (Scheme 2, eq 2). A significant amount of the minor
regioisomer 2a was obtained, which was fluorinated at the
site distal to the ester and opposite that expected for
hydrofluorination of simple alkylaryl internal alkynes, sug-
gesting that the ester exhibited a directing effect. This
directing effect was significantly more pronounced with
dialkyl alkyne substrate 3, giving 91:9 regioselectivity, again
with exclusive Z-stereoselectivity (Scheme 2, eq 2). We then
examined alkynes 5, 7, and 9 to determine how the
regioselectivity is affected by the length of the alkyl chain
connecting the alkyne and the directing ester (Scheme 2, eqs
3-5). Substrate 5 was found to favor regioisomer 6b (19:
81), approaching the regioselectivity expected for an un-
functionalized alkylarylalkyne (7:93)9 and suggesting that
the directing effect of the ester is attenuated, but not
abolished, by the insertion of a single methylene unit in 5
a Yields reported as the average combined yield of all isomers for two
reactions, unless otherwise noted. Isomeric ratios determined by 19F NMR.
b Yield determined using an internal 19F NMR standard. c Isolated yield of
the major product.
vs 1. Shortening the distance between the carbonyl group
and the alkyne by removal of a methylene unit from 1 (as in
7) largely suppressed the formation of regioisomer 8b
compared to 2b. Interestingly, although 9 gave similar yields
of regioisomer 10, the minor product in this case was an
allylic fluoride 11. Propargyl acetates are known to undergo
a variety of skeletal rearrangements in the presence of
cationic Au, including 1,2- and 1,3-acyl shifts to give Au
vinyl carbenoids and Au allenes, respectively.12 The allylic
fluoride could be envisioned to arise from nucleophilic attack
of F- on the intermediate formed by such a 1,3-acyl shift.
We also examined ꢀ,γ-alkynyl ester substrate 12, but yields
were poor, possibly due to facile enolization of this com-
pound.
Since propargyl esters easily rearrange and cannot com-
pletely overcome the innate regioisomeric preferences in the
hydrofluorination of arylalkylalkynes, we sought to examine
other, more robust directing groups that might coordinate
more strongly to Au and enhance regioselectivity (Table 1).
Among these, carbamate-bearing compounds proved par-
ticularly revealing. The 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc)
group proved to be a superior directing group, delivering
fluoroalkenes exclusively over other rearranged products with
excellent regioselectivity for both alkylarylalkynes (entry 1,
92:8; 69% yield) and dialkylalkynes (entry 2, >50:1; 57%
yield). Intriguingly, a minor isomer in the latter case proved
(9) Akana, J. A.; Bhattacharyya, K. X.; Mu¨ller, P.; Sadighi, J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7736.
(12) (a) Correa, A.; Marion, N.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M.; Nolan,
S. P.; Cavallo, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 718. (b) Mauleo´n, P.;
Krinsky, J. L.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4513. (c) Marion,
N.; D´ıez-Gonza´lez, S.; de Fre´mont, P.; Noble, A. R.; Nolan, S. P. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3647.
(10) (a) Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1846. (b)
Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2147.
(11) Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
1307.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 19, 2009
4319