M. Soural, J. Hlavácˇ, P. Hradil, M. Hajdúch
SHORT COMMUNICATION
refluxed in trifluoroacetic acid (1 mL) for 60 min. Then the tri-
fluoroacetic acid was evaporated in vacuo, and o-xylene (1 mL) was
added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 30 min and sub-
sequently cooled to room temperature. The precipitated material
was collected by suction, washed with o-xylene, ethanol and dried.
Method B: Phenacyl thioanthranilate 2 (100 mg) was refluxed in o-
xylene (2 mL) for 120 min. After cooling to room temperature, the
precipitated material was collected by suction, washed with o-
xylene, ethanol and dried.
dilutions, in 20-µL aliquots, of the intended test concentration were
added to the microtiter plate wells at time zero. All test compound
concentrations were examined in duplicate. Incubation of the cells
with the test compounds lasted for 72 h at 37 °C, in 5 % CO2 at
100% humidity. At the end of the incubation period, the cells were
assayed by using MTT. Aliquots (10 µL) of the MTT stock solution
were pipetted into each well and incubated for a further 1–4 h.
After this incubation period, the formazan produced was dissolved
by the addition of 100 µL/well of 10% aq. SDS (pH = 5.5), fol-
lowed by a further incubation at 37 °C overnight. The optical den-
sity (OD) was measured at 540 nm with a Labsystem iEMS Reader
MF. Tumour cell survival (TCS) was calculated by using the follow-
ing equation: TCS = (ODdrug–exposed well/mean ODcontrol wells)ϫ
100%. The TCS50 value, the drug concentration lethal to 50% of
the tumour cells, was calculated from appropriate dose-response
curves.
Preparation of 2-Phenyl-3-sulfanylquinolin-4(1H)-one (3a): Phenacyl
thioanthranilate 2a (100 mg) was refluxed in degassed trifluoro-
acetic acid (1 mL) under argon for 120 min. Then the reaction mix-
ture was poured into ice-cold water, and the precipitated material
was collected by suction, washed with water and dried. An analyti-
cal sample was crystallized from ethanol.
Preparation of 4-Oxo-2-phenyl-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-sulfonic Acid
(5): Disulfide 4a (0.66 g, 1.3 mmol) was dissolved in formic acid
(5 mL), and 25% hydrogen peroxide (1.8 mL, 13 mmol) was added.
After 30 min of stirring at room temperature, the precipitated white
solid was collected by suction and washed with water.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Analytical data of the compounds prepared.
Acknowledgments
Preparation of 2-Phenyl-3-(piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl)quinolin-4(1H)-one
(6): Sulfonic acid 5 (200 mg. 0.6 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine
(0.3 mL), and thionyl chloride (0.6 mL, 8 mmol) was added drop-
wise. The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 2 h and then
concentrated to dryness. The resulting oily residue was suspended
in pyridine (1 mL), and piperidin (0.75 mmol) was added. The reac-
tion mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 2 h, and the solvents were
evaporated to dryness. The resulting residue was suspended in cold
water (10 mL) and collected by suction. The crude product was
crystallized from ethanol.
This project was supported in part by the Ministry of Education,
Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic (grants MSM6198959216,
LC 07017) and FM EEA/Norska (A/CZ0046/1/0022 and CZ0099).
[1] G. Brahmachari, D. Gorai, Curr. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 873–
898.
[2] P. Hradil, J. Jirman, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1995, 60,
1357–1366.
[3] P. Hradil, J. Hlavácˇ, K. Lemr, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1999, 36,
141.
[4] P. Hradil, L. Kvapil, J. Hlavácˇ, T. Weidlich, A. Lycˇka, K. Lemr,
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2000, 37, 831.
[5] P. Hradil, M. Grepl, J. Hlavácˇ, M. Soural, M. Malonˇ, V. Berto-
lasi, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 819.
[6] M. Soural, J. Hlavácˇ, P. Hradil, I. Frysˇová, M. Hajdúch, V.
Bertolasi, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 467–474.
[7] P. Krejcˇí, P. Hradil, J. Hlavácˇ, M. Hajdúch, Patent
WO2008028427, 2008.
[8] P. Hradil, P. Krejcˇí, J. Hlavácˇ, I. Wiedermannová, A. Lycˇka, V.
Bertolasi, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2004, 41, 375–379.
[9] A. T. Fanning, G. R. Bickford, T. D. Roberts, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1972, 94, 8505–8506.
Biological Activity
Cell Lines: All cells were purchased from the American Tissue Cul-
ture Collection (ATCC), unless otherwise indicated. The daunorub-
icin-resistant subline of CEM cells (CEM-DNR bulk) and paclit-
axel-resistant subline K562-tax were selected in our laboratory by
the cultivation of maternal cell lines in increasing concentrations
of daunorubicine or paclitaxel, respectively.[11] The cells were main-
tained in Nunc/Corning 80 cm2 plastic tissue culture flasks and cul-
tured in cell culture medium (DMEM/RPMI 1640 with 5 g/L glu-
cose, 2 m glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomy-
cin, 10% fetal calf serum, and NaHCO3).
[10] M. Hajdúch, V. Mihal, J. Minarik, E. Faber, M. Safarova,
Cytotechnology 1996, 19, 243–245.
Cytotoxic MTT Assay:[10,11] The cell suspensions were prepared
and diluted according to the particular cell type and the expected
target cell density (2500–30000 cells/well based on cell growth char-
acteristics). The cells were added by pipette (80 µL) into 96-well
microtiter plates. The inoculates were allowed a pre-incubation
period of 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for stabilisation. Four-fold
[11] V. Nosková, P. Dzˇubák, G. Kuzmina, A. Ludková, D. Stehlík,
ˇ
R. Trojanec, A. Janosˇtáková, G. Korˇínková, V. Mihál, M.
Hajdúch, Neoplasma 2002, 49, 418–425.
Received: April 17, 2009
Published Online: July 1, 2009
3870
www.eurjoc.org
© 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 3867–3870