C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Enantioselective Vinylogous R-Ketol Rearrangement
Catalyzed by the 3b/NBLP Catalyst Systema
ingly, highly enantioselective rearrangement reactions were carried
out with 91-97% ee and 80-87% yield (entries 8 and 11-13),
and good diastereoselectivities (8:1 to 26:1 dr) in the products were
also demonstrated. Notably, control experiments with decreased
catalyst loading (1j) and enlarged reaction scale (cis/trans-1h)10a
indicated little influence on the stereoselectivity and yields, but some
effect on the reactivity was found in the former case. To further
clarify the influence of the diastereomeric ratio of the reactants on
the reaction diastereo- and enantioselectivity, cis-1h (entry 9) and
trans-1h (entry 10) were independently subjected to the current
standard conditions. Interestingly, improved and decreased stereo-
selectivity, respectively, for the major isomer product were
observed. This fact clearly demonstrates that the cis isomer is the
matched substrate for the diastereo- and enantioselectivity of this
asymmetric vinylogous R-ketol rearrangement under the current
organocatalysis, while the trans isomer is the unmatched one. It
should be noted that the absolute configuration of the product 2k
was unambiguously assigned by X-ray crystallography.10b
In conclusion, an unprecedented organocatalytic enantioselective
vinylogous R-ketol rearrangement reaction via a semipinacol-type
1,2-carbon migration was discovered for the first time, and chiral
all-carbon quaternary stereocenters in spirocyclic diketones were
constructed with good to excellent enantiocontrol. Our current
methodology for the asymmetric synthesis of quaternary stereogenic
centers constitutes an alternative strategy to classical semipinacol
rearrangement. Further studies of the detailed mechanism and
synthetic applications are under investigation.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial support
from the NSFC (20621091, 20672048, and 20732002) and the
Chang Jiang Scholars Program.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, com-
pound characterization, and X-ray crystallographic data (CIF) for 1j
and 2k. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
a For experimental details, see the Supporting Information. b For entries
11-13, the major cis isomer is described. c For entries 8-13, the absolute
configuration of major diastereoisomer is given. d Isolated yield.
e Determined by chiral HPLC. f The yield in parentheses was based on the
recovered starting material. g The dr value in parentheses was determined
by chiral HPLC. h The dr value in parentheses was determined by 1H NMR.
i The ee value of the major isomer. j 57% ee for the minor isomer. k 41%
ee for the minor isomer. l 77% ee for the minor isomer.
(1) Quaternary Stereocenters: Challenges and Solutions for Organic Synthesis;
Christoffers, J., Baro, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
(2) For recent reviews, see: (a) Douglas, C. J.; Overman, L. E. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2004, 101, 5363. (b) Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. Synthesis
2006, 369. (c) Cozzi, P. G.; Hilgraf, R.; Zimmermann, N. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 5969. (d) Bella, M.; Gasperi, T. Synthesis 2009, 1583.
(3) (a) Zhang, E.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Fan, C.-A.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, Y.-J.; Zhang, S.-Y.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4943, and references therein. (b) Wang, F.; Tu, Y. Q.;
Fan, C. A.; Wang, S. H.; Zhang, F. M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13,
395. (c) Wang, M.; Wang, B. M.; Shi, L.; Tu, Y. Q.; Fan, C.-A.; Wang,
S. H.; Hu, X. D.; Zhang, S. Y. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5580.
(4) For transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric 1,2-migrations for the synthesis
of all-carbon quaternary centers, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Xie, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 6231, and references therein. (b) Kleinbeck, F.; Toste, F. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9178.
(5) For an excellent review of the R-ketol rearrangement, see: (a) Paquette,
L. A.; Hofferberth, J. E. Org. React. 2003, 62, 477. For Ni- and Al-catalyzed
asymmetric versions, see: (b) Brunner, H.; Sto¨hr, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 2777. (c) Brunner, H.; Kagan, H. B.; Kreutzer, G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 497. (d) Brunner, H.; Kagan, H. B.; Kreutzer, G.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2177. (e) Ooi, T.; Ohmatsu, K.;
Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2410.
centers in spirocycles could be effectively constructed by this
semipinacol-type 1,2-carbon migration in the enantioselective
vinylogous R-ketol rearrangement, and a wide range of spirocyclic
1,4-diketones 2b-k were obtained with good to excellent enanti-
oselectivities (82-97% ee) in moderate to high yields (57-95%
yield). Compared with the model substrate 1a (entry 1), hydroxy
enones disubstituted at the C3 position of the cyclobutanol moiety
(1b-d, entries 2-4) underwent the molecular rearrangement with
increased asymmetric induction. When substrates disubstituted at
the R′ and ꢀ′ positions of the cyclohexenone moiety (1e and 1f,
respectively, entries 5 and 6) were used, slightly decreased
enantiocontrol was observed, and R′-substitution caused a dramatic
decrease in the reactivity of this rearrangement reaction (entry 5).
One substrate with a cycloheptenone motif instead of the cyclo-
hexenone unit (1g, entry 7) was also explored and certainly showed
good ee and yield. In addition, some C3-monosubstituted examples
(1h-k, entries 8 and 11-13), in which cis-1,1,3-trisubstituted
cyclobutanes were the major or predominant components of the
starting material, were examined in this catalytic system. Interest-
(6) For recent reviews of chiral iminium catalysis, see: (a) Lelais, G.;
MacMillan, D. W. C. Aldrichimica Acta 2006, 39, 79. (b) Erkkilae, A.;
Majander, I.; Pihko, P. M. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5416.
(7) For reviews of the synthesis of spirocyclic compounds, see: (a) Sannigrahi,
M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 9007. (b) Pradhan, R.; Patra, M.; Behera, A. K.;
Mishra, B. K.; Behera, R. K. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 779. (c) Kotha, S.;
Deb, A. C.; Lahiri, K.; Manivannan, E. Synthesis 2009, 165.
(8) For reviews of chiral primary amine catalysis, see: (a) Bartoli, G.;
Melchiorre, P. Synlett 2008, 1759. (b) Chen, Y.-C. Synlett 2008, 1919.
(9) (a) Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Carlone, A.; Pesciaioli, F.; Sambri, L.; Melchiorre,
P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1403. (b) Chen, W.; Du, W.; Duan, Y.-Z.; Wu, Y.;
Yang, S.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7667.
(10) (a) For details, see p S-16 in the SI. (b) For details, see p S-18 in the SI.
JA906291N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 41, 2009 14627