Communications
(EMSA), even upon the addition of excess amounts of the
metals (Table 1; see also Figure S2 in the Supporting Infor-
mation).[9] Therefore, we designed an alternative protein,
bZIP-2, with two pairs of Ida moieties in the leucine zipper
segment to cause greater destabilization upon the addition of
a metal (Figure 1).[8]
Table 1: Kd values for the binding of bZIP proteins to AP-1 in the absence
or presence of a metal.
Kd[a] [nm]
Scheme 1. Preparation of Ts-S-IDA (5), an agent for the modification of
proteins with Ida. DIEA=diisopropylethylamine, DMF=N,N-dimethyl-
formamide, Ts=p-toluenesulfonyl.
no metal
CoII
NiII
MnII
bZIP-wt
bZIP-1a
bZIP-1b
bZIP-2
15Æ2.6
24Æ2.7
22Æ3.7
22Æ3.0
21Æ1.0
16Æ1.2
58Æ15
26Æ8.1
17Æ2.0
44Æ4.7
26Æ3.9
50Æ15
23Æ3.1
16Æ2.5
38Æ7.3
27Æ4.6
64Æ10
21Æ2.6
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5; Tris = tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane)
at 48C for 1 h yielded the desired bZIP proteins without
difficulty.[8] Monitored by HPLC, the reaction reached
completion almost immediately upon the addition of Ts-S-
IDA (5); no side reactions were detected.
Unexpectedly, CD spectroscopy showed that the addition
of metals in the presence of DNA had only a slight effect on
the structure of bZIP-1a and bZIP-1b (Figure 2a; see also
Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Similarly, no
significant decrease in the affinity of these proteins for
DNA was observed in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay
>1000[b]
bZIP-2+EDTA
22Æ1.1
[a] The Kd value was determined by an electrophoretic mobility shift
assay, as described in the Supporting Information. All values reported are
the mean of at least three measurements (Æ the standard deviation).
[b] Protein concentration at which the bound fraction of the DNA is
about half the maximum amount (q=0.5).
The CD spectrum of bZIP-2 suggested that this protein
has a helical structure, although its helical content was
somewhat lower than that of the wild-type bZIP protein in the
presence of DNA (the [q]222 values for bZIP-2 and bZIP-wt
were À2.5 ꢀ 10À4 and À3.1 ꢀ 10À4 degcm2 dmolÀ1, respec-
tively), possibly as a result of electrostatic repulsion between
the various Ida moieties (Figure 2b; see also Figure S1d in
the Supporting Information). Analysis by EMSA showed that
bZIP-2 had a similar affinity for the AP-1 site of DNA to that
of the wild type in the absence of metals (the Kd values for
bZIP-2 and bZIP-wt were 22 Æ 3.0 and 15 Æ 2.6 nm, respec-
tively; Figure 3; see also Figure S2a in the Supporting
Information).
A significant decrease in the helical content and affinity
for DNA of bZIP-2 was observed upon the addition of CoII
(Figures 2b and 3). The addition of CoII (30 mm; 1.5 equiv for
each Ida pair) induced a 33% decrease in the helical content.
Metal titration of the protein showed a saturation in the
decrease of the helical content at 2 equivalents of CoII to the
protein (Figure 2b, inset). These results suggested that metal
coordination to each Ida moiety effectively leads to the
structural alteration of bZIP-2. Furthermore, a dramatic
decrease in the affinity of bZIP-2 for the target DNA was
observed in the presence of 30 mm CoII (Kd > 1000 nm;
Figure 3, Table 1): the Kd value of the protein was more
than 45 times higher than in the absence of CoII (Kd = 22 Æ
3.0 nm). The addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA; 300 mm) resulted in complete recovery of the
DNA-binding affinity (Kd = 22 Æ 1.1 nm).[10,11] Thus, the incor-
poration of two pairs of Ida moieties in the protein structure
led to a bZIP protein that interacts reversibly with the target
DNA as a result of CoII binding.
Figure 2. Difference CD spectra of a) bZIP-1a and b) bZIP-2 (10 mm) in
the absence (black) or presence (red) of CoII (30 mm). The spectra
shown were obtained by subtracting the spectra of AP-1 (5 mm). The
inset shows the molar ellipticity at 222 nm, [q]222, of bZIP-2 as a
function of the CoII concentration. [P] is the protein concentration.
To assess the sensitivity of bZIP-2 to CoII during DNA
binding, we carried out a metal-titration experiment with
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6853 –6856