4998
N. K. Jobson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4996–4998
Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation to establish the key stereo-
genic centres. The final stage of this route involved the flexible and
stereospecific introduction of various iodophenoxy moieties. While
this approach has similar overall yields compared to our previous
stereoselective syntheses of iodinated reboxetine analogues, its
main advantage is that it permits the introduction of diversity at
a much later stage of the synthetic route (e.g., penultimate step)
and thus, allows easier preparation of small libraries of com-
pounds. More importantly, in vitro testing of these compounds
has identified ortho-iodophenoxy analogue 5 as having excellent
affinity for NAT and therefore, significant potential for develop-
ment as a SPECT tracer for this receptor. The preparation of meta-
and para-iodophenoxy analogues 6 and 7 has allowed us to probe
the structure–activity-relationship of the iodophenoxy moiety of
these compounds and the results have emphasised the require-
ment of ortho-substituted analogues for high affinity with this
receptor. The radiosynthesis and in vivo evaluation of 5 as a SPECT
imaging agent for NAT and the development of further analogues
of 7 for imaging SERT is currently underway.
a
O
O
HO
MsO
N
N
Boc
Boc
15
16
b
c
I
I
O
O
O
O
N
H
N
Boc
5-7
17-19
Acknowledgements
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) MeSO2Cl, Et3N, DMAP (cat.), CH2Cl2, 88%;
(b) 2-iodophenol, 3-iodophenol or 4-iodophenol, Cs2CO3, , 1,4-dioxane, (17, 61%;
D
18, 32%; 19, 52%); (c) TFA, CH2Cl2 (5, 76%; 6, 80%; 7, 55%).
Financial support from EPSRC (DTA award to NKJ), BBSRC
(Industrial Studentship with GSK to ARC) and Medical Research
Scotland is gratefully acknowledged.
Table 1
Binding affinity of (2R,3S)-reboxetine analogues 5, 6 and 7 with NAT, SERT and DAT
Supplementary data
Compound
NAT Ki (nm)
SERT Ki (nm)
DAT Ki (nm)
Supplementary data (Experimental procedures and spectro-
scopic data for all compounds synthesised as well as details for
competition binding assays.) associated with this article can be
8.4 1.7a
51.5 8.4
525.9 125.5
O
References and notes
O
I
1. (a) Amara, S. G.; Kuhar, M. J. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1993, 16, 73; (b) Blakely, R. D.;
Bauman, A. L. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000, 10, 328.
2. Zhu, M.-Y.; Ordway, G. A. J. Neurochem. 1997, 68, 134.
N
H
5
3. Spillmann, M. K.; Van der Does, A. J. W.; Rankin, M. A.; Vuolo, R. D.; Alpert, J. E.;
Nierenberg, A. A.; Rosenbaum, J. F.; Hayden, D.; Schoenfeld, D.; Fava, D.
Psychopharmacology 2001, 155, 123.
4. Biederman, J.; Spencer, T. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 46, 1234.
5. Hisamichi, S.; Moon, A. Y.; Aoyagi, A.; Hara, T.; Abe, K.; Yamazaki, R.; Kumagae,
Y.; Naruto, S.; Koyama, K.; Marumoto, S.; Tago, K.; Toda, N.; Takami, K.;
Yamada, N.; Ori, M.; Kogen, H.; Kaneko, T. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2003, 93, 95.
6. Tejani-Butt, S. M.; Yang, J. X.; Zaffar, H. Brain Res. 1993, 631, 147.
7. Hajos, M.; Fleishaker, J. C.; Filipiak-Reisner, J. K.; Brown, M. T.; Wong, E. H. F.
CNS Drug Rev. 2004, 10, 23.
8. Kanegawa, N.; Kiyono, Y.; Kimura, H.; Sugita, T.; Kajiyama, S.; Kawashima, H.;
Ueda, M.; Kuge, Y.; Saji, H. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2006, 33, 639.
9. Tamagnan, G. D.; Brenner, E.; Alagille, D.; Staley, J. K.; Haile, C.; Koren, A.; Early,
M.; Baldwin, R. M.; Tarazi, F. I.; Baldessarini, R. J.; Jarkas, N.; Goodman, M. M.;
Seibyl, J. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 533.
1700 500
154.0 12.0
1900 600
O
O
I
I
N
H
6
10. Jobson, N. K.; Spike, R.; Crawford, A. R.; Dewar, D.; Pimlott, S. L.; Sutherland, A.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2369.
11. Jobson, N. K.; Crawford, A. R.; Dewar, D.; Pimlott, S. L.; Sutherland, A. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4940.
12. Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.; Sharpless, K. B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765.
13. VanHessche, K. P. M.; Wang, Z.-M.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
3469.
1100 200
34.5 1.7
2100 300
O
O
N
H
7
14. The enantiomeric excess of compound 9 was determined by chiral HPLC. See
Supplementary data for full details.
a
Calculated from five independent experiments. All other assays calculated from
three independent experiments.
15. Siddiqui, S. A.; Narkhede, U. C.; Lahoti, R. J.; Srinivasan, K. V. Synlett 2006, 1771.
16. Fish, P. V.; Deur, C.; Gan, X.; Greene, K.; Hoople, D.; Mackenny, M.; Para, K. S.;
Reeves, K.; Ryckmans, T.; Stiff, C.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2562.
17.
A a
[3H]nisoxetine displacement assay was used for NAT, [3H]citalopram
displacement assay for SERT and a [3H]WIN-35,428 displacement assay for
DAT. See Supplementary data for full details.
para-iodophenoxy analogue 7 showed low affinity for NAT, it did
show high affinity (Ki 34.5 nM) and high selectivity for SERT and
thus, further analogues of 7 may find application in the SPECT
imaging of this receptor.
In summary, a stereoselective 10-step synthesis of (2R,3S)-
iodophenoxyreboxetine analogues has been achieved using a
18. Melloni, P.; Carniel, G.; Torre, A. D.; Bonsignori, A.; Buonamici, M.; Pozzi, O.;
Ricciardi, S.; Rossi, A. C. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 19, 235.
19. Boot, J.; Cases, M.; Clark, B. P.; Findlay, J.; Gallagher, P. T.; Hayhurst, L.; Man, T.;
Montalbetti, C.; Rathmell, R. E.; Rudyk, H.; Walter, M. W.; Whatton, M.; Wood,
V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 699.