F. Wakenhut et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5078–5081
5081
PUP (% change relative to control)
References and notes
80
70
60
*
1. (a) Jann, M. W.; Slade, J. H. Pharmacotherapy 2007, 11, 1571; (b) Montgomery, S.
Int. J. Psych. Clin. Pract. 2006, 10, 5; (c) Jackson, S. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2005, 21,
1669.
2. (a) Wernicke, J. F.; Iyengar, S.; Ferrer-Garcia, M. D. Curr. Drug Ther. 2007, 2, 161;
(b) Bauer, M.; Moeller, H.-J.; Schneider, E. Exp. Opin. Pharmacotherapy 2006, 7,
421.
3. Kajdasz, D. K.; Iyengar, S.; Desaiah, D. Clin. Ther. 2007, 29, 2536.
4. (a) Mariappan, P.; Alhasso, A.; Ballantyne, Z.; Grant, A.; N’Dow, J. Eur. Urol.
2007, 51, 67; (b) Steers, W. D.; Herschorn, S.; Kreder, K. J.; Moore, K.; Strohbehn,
K.; Yalcin, I.; Bump, R. C. BJU Int. 2007, 100, 337.
5. Thor, K. B.; Kirby, M.; Viktrup, L. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 1349.
6. (a) Fray, M. J.; Bish, G.; Brown, A. D.; Fish, P. V.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.;
Whitlock, G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4345; (b) Fray, M. J.; Bish, G.;
Fish, P. V.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2006, 16, 4349.
*
*
*
*
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 nM
0.5 nM
4 nM
7.5 nM
27 nM
103 nM 227 nM
Compound 9 free plasma concentration
Figure 4. The effects of compound 9 on peak urethral pressure expressed as
percentage change relative to control. Data is expressed as the mean SEM and
significant difference relative to control is denoted thus *p <0.05 (n = 4, n denotes
the number individual animals used to generate a cumulative dose response via iv
7. Fish, P. V.; Fray, M. J.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2022.
8. Whitlock, G. A.; Blagg, J.; Fish, P. V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 596.
9. Fish, P. V.; Deur, C.; Gan, X.; Greene, K.; Hoople, D.; Mackenny, M.; Para, K. S.;
Reeves, K.; Ryckmans, T.; Stiff, C.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2562.
infusion of compound to
a steady state free plasma concentration. Each bar
represents the mean response versus mean free plasma concentration for each
step). Dog functional potency for compound 9 was dSRI IC50 = 7.4 nM (platelet,
n = 18), dNRI IC50 = 28.6 nM (carotid artery, n = 15).19
10. Wakenhut, F.; Fish, P. V.; Fray, M. J.; Gurrell, I.; Mills, J. E.; Stobie, A.; Whitlock,
G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4308.
11. SNRI activity of target compounds was established using scintillation proximity
assay (SPA) technology by assessing their ability to inhibit binding of selective
radioligands at the human 5-HT, NA and DA transporters. Cellular membrane
preparations generated from recombinant HEK293 cells expressing a single
monoamine transporter were utilised for these experiments. For details of the
assay conditions, see: Andrews, M. D.; Brown, A. D.; Fish, P. V.; Fray, M. J.;
Lansdell, M. I.; Ryckmans, T.; Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Gray, D. L. F. WO Patent
064351, 2006, pp 56–59. The BioByte software was used to assess clog P.
12. Adult, female, nulliparous beagle dogs were anaesthetised initially with
sodium pentobarbitone to induce surgical anaesthesia (30 mg/kg iv), and
study, it is evident that 9 significantly increases urethral tone in a
dose dependent manner. Furthermore, at an unbound plasma con-
centration of 4 nM, 9 increases PUP in the dog by 35%. To put this
result into context, this is superior to the 26% increase induced in
this model by 4.5 nM duloxetine, a concentration we estimate to
be close to human therapeutic free plasma concentrations based
on published human pharmacokinetic data18 and in-house human
plasma protein binding determinations (estimated free Cmax 5–
10 nM at 40 mg bid).
Finally, 9 was found to be clean in a package of in vitro and
in vivo genetic toxicology screens, produced no dose-limiting tox-
icity in acute and sub-chronic (14-day) oral rat and dog toxicology
screens and did not exhibit significant effect on spontaneous loco-
motor activity vs vehicle control in rats when administered orally
up to 15 mg/kg.
In summary, we have described the discovery of novel benzam-
ide derivatives as potent SNRIs. More specifically, compound 9 aka
PF-184,298 exhibited potent SNRI activity in combination with
good DRI selectivity, good metabolic stability, weak CYP inhibition,
low affinity for ion channels and no significant off-target pharma-
cology. Furthermore, isomerisation of the amide moiety to the ben-
zylic position resulted in a significant reduction in P-gp recognition
that translated into improved BBB penetration. When PF-184,298
was assessed in a dog in vivo preclinical model for stress urinary
incontinence, it elicited a dose dependent increase in PUP superior
to that observed with SNRI duloxetine. Finally, PF-184,298 did not
produce dose-limiting toxicity in preclinical toxicology screens and
was progressed to human clinical studies. The results of these
studies will be reported in future publications.
then transferred to
a-chloralose anaesthetic (70–100 mg/kg iv induction
followed by constant infusion to deliver 10–15 mg/kg/h iv for the duration of
the experiment), following completion of surgery. Animals were intubated, and
respiration maintained at a constant rate of 14 breaths per minute. Tidal
volume was adjusted to maintain expired air within normal physiological
limits. Throughout the experiment the animal was maintained at a core body
temperature of approximately 37 °C using a thermocouple heated blanket
(Harvard Apparatus Ltd., Kent, UK). Cannulation of superficial vessels was
carried out to allow administration of compounds, blood sampling, infusion of
anaesthetic, and monitoring of arterial pressure (Millar, 7F, Millar Instruments,
US). A midline incision was made in the abdomen to expose the bladder. The
ureters were cannulated to drain urine throughout the experiment. The dome
of the bladder was cannulated and the cannula fed through the bladder to the
external urethra. This catheter was used to introduce the urethral pressure
catheter (Millar SUPC-380C), into the urethra. The bladder was filled with
saline to achieve an intravesical pressure of approximately 8–10 mmHg, and
bladder pressure was measured by connecting the bladder catheter to
a
pressure transducer (Model DTX plus, Becton-Dickenson UK Ltd, Oxford, UK).
Following completion of surgery, animals were allowed to stabilise for at least
60 minutes before starting urethral pressure profilometry measurements.
Urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) was measured by withdrawing the
pressure transducer through the urethra at a constant rate. A full profile
measurement was obtained approximately every 6 min, and readings were
taken continuously throughout the experiment. Baseline measurements were
performed until 4 consistent measurements were identified, after which drug
administration commenced. From the profilometry data, peak urethral
pressure was measured (PUP, mmHg). Changes in PUP were compared with
mean baseline value and expressed as % change from baseline, recorded over
the 4 consecutive profiles obtained prior to test drug or vehicle administration.
All experiments involving animals were carried out in compliance with
national legislation, specifically the UK Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act
1986, and subject to local ethical review.
Acknowledgements
13. Measuring CSF levels is commonly used as a way to assess Blood Brain Barrier
penetration, see: (a) Lin, L. H. Curr. Drug. Metab. 2008, 9, 46; (b) Feng, M. R. Curr.
Drug. Metab. 2002, 3, 647.
14. Deecher, D. C.; Beyer, C. E.; Johnston, G.; Bray, J.; Shah, S.; Abou-Gharbia, M.;
Andree, T. H. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 657.
15. Mahar Doan, K. M.; Humphreys, J. E.; Webster, L. O.; Wring, S. A.; Shampine, L.
J.; Serabjit-Singh, C. J.; Adkison, K. K.; Polli, J. W. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303,
1029.
16. The MDCK-mdr1 cell line is commonly used to assess P-gp recognition, see:
Hammarlund-Udenaes, M.; Bredberg, U.; Friden, M. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009,
9, 148.
We wish to thank Carol Bains, Gerwyn Bish, Timothy Buxton,
Edelweiss Evrard, Arnaud Lemaitre, Debbie Lovering, Edward Peg-
den, Bhairavi Patel, and Melanie Skerten for compound synthesis.
We are also grateful to Caroline Tolley and Doreen Davey for
screening data, Katherine Fenner and Ian Gurrell for generating
the MDCK-mdr1 data and to Kelly Conlon for providing the ure-
thral tone model materials and methods summary.
17. For a substrate model of the P-gp transporter, see: Seelig, A. Eur. J. Biochem.
1998, 251, 252.
18. (a) Chan, C.; Yeo, K. P.; Pan, A. X.; Lim, M.; Knadler, M. P.; Small, D. S. Br J. Clin.
Pharm. 2006, 63, 310; (b) kinner, M. H.; Kuan, H.; Pan, A.; Sathirakul, K.;
Knadler, M. P.; Gonzales, C. R.; Yeo, K. P.; Reddy, S.; Lim, M.; Ayan-Oshodi, M.;
Wise, S. D. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2003, 73, 170.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
19. For detailed experimental procedures see Supplementary data.