A R T I C L E S
Werneburg et al.
of p-aminobenzoate (PABA) and its subsequent transformation
into p-nitrobenzoate (PNBA) by a novel nitro group forming
N-oxygenase (AurF).29-31 PNBA is then activated by the acyl-
CoA ligase AurE and loaded onto the first module of a non-
colinear modular type I polyketide synthase (AurA-C), which
catalyzes five elongation cycles (Figure 2).32 After off-loading
of the pentaketide with lactonization, the resulting pyrone ring
is methylated by AurI,33 and finally the cytochrome P450
monooxygenase AurH introduces the tetrahydrofuran ring.34,35
The pathway thus exhibits three general levels that could be
envisaged for diversification: incorporation of the starter unit
building block,36 formation of the polyketide backbone, and
enzymatic tailoring (i.e., alkylation and oxidative heterocycliza-
tion). As initial attempts to alter the aureothin polyketide
synthase failed (data not shown), we concluded that the
thiotemplate itself is not readily amenable to manipulations. In
contrast, mutational analyses of the aur gene cluster suggested
that both the choice of starter unit and post-PKS tailoring
reactions would in principle leave some room for genetically
engineering structural variants. While an aurF null mutant could
be used for mutasynthesis approaches, variants lacking aurH
or aurI would result in deoxy-/hydroxyl- or desmethylaureothin
derivatives, respectively. Considering x possible starter units,
three variants in backbone functionalization (methylene, hy-
droxyl, tetrahydrofuran), and three different pyrone rings
(nonmethylated, R-methlyated, γ-methylated), at least in prin-
ciple 9 x aureothin derivatives could be generated.
Tolerance of the aur PKS toward Alternative Starter
Units. A mutant lacking the N-oxygenase gene aurF is suitable
for the mutasynthesis of aureothin derivative aureonitrile.37
However, apart from cyanobenzoate we could not observe the
incorporation of further alternative starter units. Surprisingly,
the situation changed dramatically when we used another genetic
construct in a different expression host. To generate deoxyau-
reothin derivatives, we deleted the N-oxygenase gene aurF as
well as the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase gene aurH from
the aur biosynthesis gene cluster. Both genes were subsequently
excised from a cosmid bearing the entire aur locus by a
combination of PCR-targeting and cloning strategies, respec-
tively. The resulting plasmid, pMZ01, was introduced into the
host strain S. albus, and the mutant strain was fermented in
liquid production media. HPLC-MS monitoring of the extracts
revealed that aureothin biosynthesis was fully abolished (Figure
3d). To complement the double knockout mutant, we supple-
mented the medium with PNBA and introduced a compatible
expression plasmid (pMZ04), a pHJ110 derivative that contains
the aurF gene downstream of the constitutive ermE promoter.
Because these conditions fully restored aureothin biosynthesis,
polar effects could be excluded. Using the ∆aurFH mutant
supplemented with PNBA, we yielded 44.8 mg L-1 deoxyau-
Figure 1. Structures of aureothin (1), N-acetylaureothamine (2), neoau-
reothin (spectinabilin, 3), and SNF4435C (4).
polyketide metabolites,13 mainly macrolide antibiotics.14-18 Yet
in comparison, polyketide-derived pyrone compounds, which
are considered as a privileged group of bioactive natural
products,19-21 have been less thoroughly investigated to date.
The densely functionalized shikimate-polyketide hybrid me-
tabolite aureothin (1) is the prototype of a series of related
pyrone compounds from actinomycetes. Whereas aureothin (1)
is known as a cytotoxic agent from the soil bacterium Strep-
tomyces thioluteus,22 N-acetylaureothamine (2) and neoaureothin
(spectinabilin, 3) were identified because of their potent anti-
Helicobacter23 and antiviral activities, respectively.24 SNF4435C
(4) and D are known as immunosuppressants25 derived from
neoaureothin by a photoinduced electrocyclic rearrangement26
(Figure 1). To gain an insight into the biological assembly lines
involved in the formation of these metabolites and to harness
the biosynthetic potential for the generation of novel analogues,
we previously cloned and sequenced the aur and nor biosyn-
thesis gene loci.27,28 Here, we report an integrated approach
using the combination of mutasynthesis, biotransformation, and
combinatorial biosynthesis for the generation of a focused library
of aureothin analogues with remarkably selective antifungal and
antiproliferative activities.
Results and Discussion
Levels of Diversification in the Enzymatic Aureothin
Assembly Line. According to our previous functional analyses,
the aureothin biosynthetic pathway is initiated by the formation
(11) Menzella, H. G.; Reeves, C. D. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10, 238–
245.
(12) Zhang, W.; Tang, Y. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2629–2633.
(13) Hertweck, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4688–4716.
(14) Khosla, C.; Keasling, J. D. Nat. ReV Drug DiscoV. 2003, 2, 1019–
1025.
(15) Wilkinson, B.; Moss, S. J. Curr. Opin. Drug. DiscoVery DeV. 2005,
8, 748–756.
(16) Wilkinson, B.; Micklefield, J. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 379–386.
(17) Kirschning, A.; Taft, F.; Knobloch, T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5,
3245–3259.
(18) Zhou, H.; Xie, X.; Tang, Y. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 590–
596.
(27) He, J.; Hertweck, C. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 1225–1232.
(28) Traitcheva, N.; Jenke-Kodama, H.; He, J.; Dittmann, E.; Hertweck,
C. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 1841–1849.
(19) McGlacken, G. P.; Fairlamb, I. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 369–
385.
(20) Wilk, W.; Waldmann, H.; Kaiser, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 17,
2304–2309.
(29) He, J.; Hertweck, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3694–3695.
(30) Winkler, R.; Hertweck, C. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4152–4155.
(31) Winkler, R.; Richter, M.; Knu¨pfer, U.; Merten, D.; Hertweck, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8016–8018.
(21) Busch, B.; Hertweck, C. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1833–1840.
(22) Hirata, Y.; Nakata, H.; Yamada, K.; Okuhara, K.; Naito, T. Tetrahe-
dron 1961, 14, 252–274.
(32) He, J.; Hertweck, C. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 908–912.
(33) Mu¨ller, M.; He, J.; Hertweck, C. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 37–39.
(34) He, J.; Mu¨ller, M.; Hertweck, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16742–
16743.
(23) Taginuchi, M.; Watanabe, M.; Nagai, K.; Suzumura, K. I.; Suzuki,
K. I.; Tanaka, A. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 844–847.
(24) Cassinelli, G.; Grein, A.; Orezzi, P.; Pennella, P.; Sanfilippo, A. Arch.
Microbiol. 1967, 55, 358.
(35) Richter, M. E. A.; Traitcheva, N.; Knu¨pfer, U.; Hertweck, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8872–8875.
(25) Takahashi, K.; Tsuda, E.; Kurosawa, K. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 548–
553.
(36) Moore, B. S.; Hertweck, C. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 70–99.
(37) Ziehl, M.; He, J.; Dahse, H.-M.; Hertweck, C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 1202–1205.
(26) Mu¨ller, M.; Kusebauch, B.; Liang, G.; Beaudry, C. M.; Trauner, D.;
Hertweck, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7835–7838.
9
10408 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 30, 2010