Organic Letters
Letter
a
limit their practical application due to the toxic and severe
reaction conditions; for example, heating needs to exceed 100
°C. Therefore, there is an urgent demand for a safe, mild, and
efficient strategy for promoting the cyanidation in organic
synthesis.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
In recent years, it has been common that they were a wide
use of a variety of electrophilic cyanation reagents, such as 4-
toluenesulfonyl cyanide (TsCN),11 N-cyano-N-phenyl-p-tolue-
nesulfonamide (NCTS),12 N-cyanosuccinimide,13 and N-
cyanophthalimide14 as the cyanide sources. These cyanation
reagents exhibit unique advantages of low toxicity and simple
postprocessing. For example, electrophilic C−H cyanation
catalyzed by Rh and Ru has been developed by using NCTS as
cyanation reagent (Scheme 1b).15 However, large-scale
application of these methods is limited due to the high cost
and low conversion of cyanation reagents. Therefore, it is
desirable to find high conversion and low cost alternatives to
NCTS and develop catalytic systems using inexpensive
transition metals as the catalysts.
Based on this idea and inspired by previous work, we
envisioned using cheap nickel16 as the catalyst instead of noble
metal catalysts and NCITD as a high conversion rate cyanation
reagent, wherein NCITD has the advantages of simple
preparation, safety, and stability. Herein, a Ni(acac)2-catalyzed
C(sp2)−H electrophilic cyanation strategy was described by
applying NCITD as the cyanide source (Scheme 1c).
“CN”
b
entry
source
catalyst
ligand
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
1,10-Phen
Pcy3
DPEphos
solvent
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NCTS
TSCN
NCP
NNS
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Co(OAc)2
Ni(OAc)2
NiCl2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
Ni(acac)2
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
toluene
CCl4
MeOH
DMF
56
35
28
31
c
d
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
NCITD
65 ; 72; 72
71
trace
25
36
42
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
60
63
e
f
76 ; 85; 84
15
67
70
51
36
DPEphos
DPEphos
DPEphos
DPEphos
In order to obtain optimal reaction conditions, we applied 2-
phenylpyridine (1a) as a model substrate. The experimental
results obtained were shown in Table 1. Initially, NCTS was
used as electrophilic cyanation reagent when we adopted the
Ni(acac)2 as catalyst, PPh3 as ligand, AgOAc as additive, and
Et3N as base in dichloroethane (DCE) under a temperature of
80 °C for a period of 12 h. In the reaction, as desired, there was
product 2a generated with a 56% yield (Table 1, entry 1).
According to the results, the Ni-catalyzed C−H bond
electrophilic cyanation reaction is feasible. We tried to find
other similar electrophilic cyanation reagents to replace NCTS
due to it is complicated to prepare and expensive
commercially. TSCN, NNS, and NCP were used as the
cyanation reagents to obtain the yields of 2a were obtained
(28−35%) (Table 1, entries 2−4). To our delight, NCITD was
chosen as the electrophilic cyanation reagent, in which case
there was the product 2a generated in a yield reaching 72%
(Table 1, entry 5). According to the results, NCITD was more
compatible with this nickel-catalyzed process than the
commonly used cyanation reagents such as NCTS and
TsCN. Next, the catalyst was evaluated as a crucial factor in
the reaction by using some common transition metal as the
catalysts. Pd(OAc)2 was used as the catalyst to give a slightly
decreased yield (Table 1, entry 6). Cu(OAc)2 was use as the
catalyst without the corresponding product 2a obtained (Table
1, entry 7). Co(OAc)2 as the catalyst only produced the
product 2a in 26% yield (Table 1, entry 8). The yields of NiCl2
and Ni(OAc)2 instead of Ni(acac)2 were 36% and 42%,
respectively (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). According to the
above experimental results, Ni(acac)2 was an effective catalyst.
Then the ligands as another factor of the reaction were also
investigated. In the case of use of the 1,10-Phen and
tricyclohexylphosphan (Pcy3) as the ligands, there were a
decrease in the yields of the product 2a to respective
percentages of 60% and 63%. (Table 1, entries 11 and 12).
However, in the event of application of bis[2-
(diphenylphosphino)phenyl] ether (DPEphos) as the ligand,
a
Reaction conditions: 2-phenylpyridine (1a, 0.10 mmol), “CN”
source (0.20 mmol), catalyst (10 mol %), ligand (15 mol %), AgOAc
(0.20 mmol), Et3N (0.025 mmol), in solvent (1.0 mL), refluxing for
12 h. Yield by rapid column chromatography.
NCITD (0.15 and 0.25 mmol, respectively). Catalyst Ni(acac)2 (5
and 15 mol %, respectively).
b
c,d
“CN” source
e,f
there was an increase in yielding 2a to 85% (Table 1, entry
13). We found that no ligand was added, and the yield
decreased significantly to 15% (Table 1, entry 14).
Finally, an investigation on the reaction solvents was
performed. As per the results, the toluene and CCl4 were
adopted as the solvents to afford the yields in 67% and 70%,
respectively (Table 1, entries 15 and 16). Methanol (MeOH)
and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the solvents gave
lower yields in 51% and 36%, respectively (Table 1, entries 17
and 18). Moreover, the yield of the product did not change
with the increase of the amount of NCITD (Table 1, entries 5c
and 5d). The yield of the product changed little with the
increase of the amount of Ni(acac)2 (Table 1, entries 13e and
f
13 ).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, we conducted an
exploration of substrate scope and this reaction’s limitations as
shown in Scheme 2. For 2-pyridyl as the direct group, we first
studied the effect of the substituent −R in the aryl moiety. As
mentioned earlier, 2-phenylpyridine (1a) as the substrate
afforded a yield of 85%. For the substituent at para position,
electron-donating group −CH3 gave the product 2b in 87%
yield, while electron-withdrawing group −F gave a reduced
yield of the product 2c to 70%. The −CH3 at the meta position
also afforded the product 2d in 83% yield. For ortho
substituents, the −CH3 gave cyanide product in a dropped
yield to 70% (2e), while the yield of the −F was only 50% (2f).
Next, we evaluated the effect of the substituents in pyridine
moiety. The electron-donating groups −CH3 and −OCH3
2869
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2868−2872