or comparable with, that of (R)-sulfonamide D.13 Among
them, (R)-sulfonamide E was found to be the best ligand in
terms of the asymmetric induction, although the coupling
yield was modest (65%). In order to improve the coupling
efficiency, we then attempted various modifications on the
coupling conditions used for allylation/2-haloallylation and
eventually found that addition of LiCl significantly improves
the coupling yield. The mechanistic explanation for the LiCl
effect is not clear at this time. However, we should note that
addition of LiCl slightly slows down the coupling rate.
With this modification, it is now possible to prepare 8 in
approximately 80% yield with 90% ee in a multigram scale
with excellent reproducibility (Scheme 4).14 It is worthwhile
adding that sulfonamide E can be recovered in at least 50%
yield (80% before recrystallization) by simple operation.
To reveal the scope and limitation, we studied the catalytic
asymmetric propargylation on representative aliphatic and
aromatic aldehydes in the presence of the Cr catalysts (10
mol %) derived from two sulfonamides D and E (Table 1).
Not surprisingly, it was found that the Cr catalyst derived
from E performs well for aliphatic aldehydes with no
R-substituent (see entries 1-3). Interestingly, unlike the
2-haloallylations,6b the Cr catalysts derived from both E and
D recognize the chirality of the ꢀ-methyl group present in
(S)- and (R)-citronellals (entries 4a,b and 5a,b). For R-sub-
stituted aliphatic aldehydes, the Cr catalyst derived from D
gives a better result than the catalyst from E (entries 6 and
7). Overall, the Cr catalysts derived from E and D match
well with aliphatic aldehydes. However, their performance
on benzaldehyde and trans-cinnamaldehyde is slightly lower
than, or comparable with, that by Nakada’s catalyst (entries
8 and 9).10
In order to use the reported catalytic asymmetric reaction
for the preparative purposes, it is important to have a practical
means to enrich the optical purity of 8. To achieve this goal,
we took two different approaches. First, we attempted to
convert 8 into a crystalline derivative suitable for fractional
recrystallization, but with no significant success.15 Second,
we tested use of Amano lipase to discriminate 8 from its
enantiomer at either esterification or saponification. Eventu-
ally, it was found that the acetate derived from only (S)-8 is
hydrolyzed by Amano lipase PS-800 to furnish optically pure
(S)-8, readily separable from the remaining acetate via
filtration through a silica gel plug. Amano lipase PS-800 was
found to be equally effective for the crude acetate directly
prepared from the crude product obtained in the catalytic
enantioselective Cr-mediated propargylation. Thus, the step
of lipase-based optical purity enrichment was coupled with
the workup of the catalytic enantioselective Cr-mediated
Scheme 4. New Synthesis of C14-C19 Building Block
mediated propargylation; with use of carbazole-based ligands,
they demonstrated that the catalytic enantioselective Cr-
mediated propargylation is a valuable synthetic method.10
We were encouraged with their propargylation of hex-
anal because of its structural similarity to the aldehyde 5.
However, we wished to improve its overall efficiency (55%
yield; 58% ee). In particular, considering a possible mecha-
nistic similarity between Cr-mediated propargylation and
allylation/2-haloallylation, we were anxious to test the
sulfonamide ligand developed for catalytic enantioselective
Cr-mediated 2-haloallylation and allylation in this laboratory.6b
In the presence of the Cr catalyst prepared from CrBr3
and the (R)-sulfonamide D (Scheme 4),6b catalytic enanti-
oselective propargylation of 5 with propargyl bromide (7)
proceeded smoothly to furnish 8 in 83% yield with 87% ee.
1
The optical purity of 8 was estimated from a H NMR
analysis of its Mosher ester, and on the basis of the previous
examples,6 the absolute configuration was predicted as
indicated and then confirmed by a chemical correlation with
the authentic sample prepared via a different route.11
As shown for the allylation/2-haloallylation, this reaction
was easy to scale up. Unlike the allylation/2-haloallylation,
however, the asymmetric induction of this process varied
between 80% and 87%. Despite extensive efforts, we were
unable to establish an experimental protocol to reproducibly
perform the coupling at the level of 87% ee. Under this
circumstance, we shifted our focus to search for a new
sulfonamide ligand.
(12) Guo, H.; Dong, C.-G.; Kim, D.-S.; Urabe, D.; Wang, J.; Kim, J. T.;
Liu, X.; Sasaki, T.; Kishi, Y. Submitted for publication.
Using the ligand-optimization strategy recently devel-
oped,12 we searched for an alternative ligand within the pool
of chiral sulfonamides, whose performance is better than,
(13) These included the following sulfonamides: R1 ) t-Bu/R2 ) 3,5-
(CF3)2Ph//R3 ) (OMe)3 (er ) 20:1, 65% yield); R1 ) t-Bu/R2
)
3,5-(CF3)2Ph/R3 ) OPh (er ) 17:1, 68% yield); R1 ) t-Bu/R2 ) 3,5-
(CF3)2Ph/R3 ) OMe (er ) 15:1, 65% yield); R1 ) t-Bu/R2 ) 3,5-(Cl)2Ph/
R3 ) (OMe)3 (er ) 15:1, 73% yield); R1 ) t-Bu/R2 ) 3,5-(Cl)2Ph/R3 ) F
(er ) 11:1, 80% yield); R1 ) t-Bu/R2 ) 3,5-(CF3)2Ph/R3 ) F (er ) 11:1,
80% yield).
(10) Inoue, M.; Nakada, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2977.
(11) Chiral homopropargyl alcohol 8 was synthesized via addition of
TMS-acetylene anion to chiral epoxide obtained through Jacobsen’s
hydrolytic kinetic resolution of racemic epoxide: Tokunaga, M.; Larrow,
J. F.; Kakiuchi, F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Science 1997, 277, 936.
(14) For details, see the Supporting Information.
(15) Propargyl alcohol derivatives, including 4-acetylphenylurethane,
were tested.
4522
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009