Biosynthesis of Mycobacterial Phenolic Glycolipids
A R T I C L E S
polyacrylamide gels were exposed to storage phosphor screens
(GE Healthcare), which were subsequently scanned using a
Typhoon Trio Imager (Amersham Biosciences).
of 2 M HCl, the products were extracted with ethyl acetate (1.4
mL × 5), and the recovered organic layer was evaporated to
dryness. The residual material was dissolved in 50 µL of dichlo-
romethane/methanol (3:1, vol/vol) and analyzed by LC-MS as
described below.
Incorporation of Covalently Bound [14C]Malonyl-CoA-Derived
Label onto Pks15/1. The extender unit loading experiments were
conducted using reported approaches for monitoring [14C]/[3H]acyl-
enzyme thioester intermediate formation.4b,15 The proteins utilized
were recombinantly produced and purified as described in the
Supporting Information. The standard reaction mixture (20 µL)
contained 50 µM [14C]malonyl-CoA, 100 mM sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.2), 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1
mM ATP, and 8 µM Pks15/1 (wild-type or mutant). After
incubation (30 °C, 3 min), the reactions were quenched by the
addition of SDS-PAGE loading buffer16 (7 µL, 3× concentrated,
lacking reducing reagent) and analyzed by standard SDS-PAGE
(7.5%).16 For detection of 14C-labeled proteins, the polyacrylamide
gels were treated and exposed to storage phosphor screens as
described in the preceding paragraph. The screens were then
scanned using a Typhoon Trio Imager.
Protein Phosphopantetheinylation Analysis. Phosphopanteth-
einylation was assessed as incorporation of the biotinylated phos-
phopantetheinyl group derived from the CoA analog biotinyl-CoA
(Avanti Polar Lipids) onto the proteins. The promiscuous Bacillus
subtilis phosphopantetheinyl transferase Sfp11 was utilized to
phosphopantetheinylate Pks15/1 proteins in vitro. Sfp was recom-
binantly produced and purified as previously reported.11 The
Pks15/1 proteins were produced recombinantly and purified as
described in the Supporting Information. The standard reaction
mixture (20 µL) contained 4 µM Pks15/1 (wild-type or mutant),
100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 10% glycerol, 2 mM
TCEP, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 50 nM Sfp, and 50 µM biotinyl-CoA. After
incubation (30 °C, 15 min), the reactions were quenched by addition
of SDS-PAGE loading buffer16 (7 µL, 3× concentrated, lacking
reducing reagent). The samples were analyzed by standard SDS-
PAGE16 (5%) and by Western blot to detect Sfp-dependent
biotinylation of Pks15/1 proteins. Western blot was carried out using
standard methodologies.16 Briefly, proteins were transferred from
the polyacrylamide gel to a hydrophobic polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) membrane (Hybond-P, GE Healthcare) using a Mini Trans-
Blot electrophoretic transfer cell as recommended by the manu-
facturer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After the electrophoretic transfer
(3 h, 200 mA), the membrane was washed with TBS-T buffer (50
mM Tris, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl; 0.1% Tween-20) and blocked in
5% skim milk powder in TBS-T. Covalently incorporated bioti-
nylated phosphopantetheinyl group onto the proteins was detected
using a commercial mouse monoclonal antibiotin-alkaline phos-
phatase conjugated antibody as recommended by the manufacturer
(Sigma-Aldrich). The antibody was used at a dilution of 1:10 000
relative to the original stock. The colorimetric detection of
biotinylated proteins was achieved using alkaline phosphatase BCIP/
NBT (5-bromo-4-chloro-3′-indolyphosphate p-toluidine salt/nitro-
blue tetrazolium chloride) liquid substrate system as recommended
by the manufacturer (Sigma-Aldrich).
FadD22-Pks15/1 Reconstituted System in Vivo. The engi-
neered E. coli strains used in the in vivo reconstitution
experiments were generated by introducing selected expression
plasmids into the expression host E. coli BL21(DE3) (Strat-
agene). The plasmids were constructed as described in the
Supporting Information and outlined in Figure S6. They were
introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) using standard electropora-
tion.16 E. coli strains were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani
(LB) media16 containing 50 µg/mL ampicillin (pETDuet-Pks15/1
or pETDuet-1 containing strains), 20 µg/mL chloramphenicol
(pSU20-Sfp containing strains), 30 µg/mL kanamycin (pRSF-
ACC containing strains), and 50 µg/mL streptomycin (pCDF-
FadD22 or pCDF-1 containing strains). Cultures (30 mL) were
incubated with orbital shaking (220 rpm) at 37 °C. When cultures
reached an OD600nm of 0.6, recombinant protein production was
induced by addition of isopropyl-ꢀ-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG, 0.1 mM). pHBA (5 µM) was added to the cultures
concomitantly with IPTG, except in selected control cultures.
After 24 h of additional incubation at a reduced temperature
optimized for protein expression (18 °C, 220 rpm), cells were
harvested by centrifugation (6000g, 20 min) and washed with
100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2 (5 mL × 3). After
being washed, the cells were resuspended in 500 µL of 100 mM
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1 mM TCEP, and
cell lysates were prepared using a Mini-Bead Beater cell disrupter
(BioSpec Products, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instruc-
tions. The cell lysates were treated by addition of 100 µL of 1
M NaOH and incubated at 65 °C for 20 min to release covalently
bound products from the enzymes. After acidification with 100
µL of 2 M HCl, the products were extracted with ethyl acetate
(700 µL × 5), and the recovered organic layer was evaporated
to dryness. The residual material was dissolved in 50 µL of
dichloromethane/methanol (3:1, vol/vol) and analyzed by LC-MS
as described below.
LC-MS Instrumentation and Analysis. Mass spectral data
were collected at the City University of New York (CUNY) Mass
Spectrometry Facility at Hunter College (New York, NY) on an
Agilent Technologies G6520A high-resolution Q-TOF mass
spectrometer attached to an Agilent Technologies 1200 Capillary
HPLC system. Samples were ionized by electrospray ionization
in negative mode. Chromatography was performed on a Zorbax
2.1 × 30 mm SB-C18 3.5 µm column (part no. 873700-902)
using water containing 0.1% formic acid and 50 µM ammonium
formate (solvent A) and 95% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic
acid and 50 µM ammonium formate (solvent B) at a flow rate
of 350 µL/min. The gradient program was as follows: 2% B
(0-3 min), 2-100% B (3-15 min), 100% B (15-30 min). Total
analysis time was 30 min. The HPLC flow was diverted to waste
for the first 2.5 min. The temperature of the column was held at
45 °C for the entire analysis. Instrument parameters were as
follows: fragmentor ) 140 V; drying gas temperature ) 300
°C; drying gas flow ) 12 L/min; nebulizer pressure ) 40 psi;
and capillary voltage ) 3500 V. Data were collected with the
instrument set to low mass range (100-1700 m/z) under high-
resolution conditions at 4 GHz, and data were stored as both
centroid and profile mode. The mass spectra were collected over
a range of 115-1600 m/z at 1 spectra/s, and MS/MS spectra
were collected over a range of 60-800 m/z at 1 spectra/s with
an isolation width of ∼4 m/z. The collision energy was ramped
using a slope of 6.5 V/100 Da and an offset of 5 V using nitrogen
as the collision gas. The reference masses used were purine with
(M - H+)- at 119.03632 m/z and HP-922 with (M + formate)-
ion at 966.00072 m/z. They were infused into the spray chamber
using Agilent’s calibrant delivery system. The instrument was
FadD22-Pks15/1 Reconstituted System in Vitro. The proteins
utilized in the reconstitution experiments were produced recombi-
nantly and purified as described in the Supporting Information. The
standard reaction mixture (1 mL) contained 8 µM pHBA, 100 mM
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 1 mM TCEP, 0.5 mM MgCl2,
1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM malonyl-CoA, 1 mM NADPH, 0.8 µM
FadD22 (wild-type or mutant), and 8 µM Pks15/1 (wild-type or
mutant). In control reactions, selected components were omitted
as indicated in the Results and Discussion. After incubation (30
°C, 5 h), the reactions were quenched by the addition of 200 µL of
1 M NaOH and incubated at 65 °C for 20 min to release covalently
bound products from the enzymes. After acidification with 200 µL
(16) Sambrook, J.; Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory
Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring
Harbor, NY, 2001.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 46, 2009 16749