5472
J. Lloyd et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5469–5473
Table 4
Table 5
N-Substitution
Ion channel selectivity of 9a and 31a
Cl
Cl
R1
F
Cl
N
Cl
N
9a
31a
R = H
N
N
R = OMe
N
R2
N
N
N
N
H
N
H
R
Compd
R1
R2
KV1.5 inhibition IC50 (lM)
a
Compd
KV1.5 inh
IC50
hERG % inh
INa %inh
ICa % inh
(
lM)
10
l
Ma
10
l
Ma
10 l
Ma
a
13
23
24
9
Cl
Cl
Cl
F
Me
Et
i-Pr
Me
n-Pr
0.068
0.057
0.094
0.024
0.048
9a
31a
0.015
0.030
83
47
37
27
NT
13
25
F
a
Values are means of 2–4 experiments.
a
Values are means of 2–4 experiments.
Table 6
Pharmacokinetic parameters of compound 9a and 31a in rats
in potency. The trifluoromethyl containing compound (19) showed
a fivefold loss of potency and the sulfone (20), sulfonamide (21),
and acetamide (22) were significantly less potent indicating that
polar groups are not well tolerated in the binding site.
9aa
31a
10 (inf)b 20 (po)c
37
a
Dose (
F (%)
t1/2 (h)
Clearance (mL/min/kg)
l
mol/kg)
10 (inf)b 20 (po)c
51
0.57 0.17
35
1.6 0.6
6
7
1.5 0.6
42 4.3
2.1 0.08
With both the chlorine and fluorine substituents in the 6-posi-
tion, we varied the nitrogen substituent. In the 6-chlorine series,
the methyl (13), ethyl (23), and isopropyl (24) substituents were
of similar potency. Likewise in the 6-fluoro series the methyl
(13) and n-propyl (25) compounds were equipotent (Table 4).
Compound 9 with the 6-fluoro substituent on the benzimid-
azole was one of the most potent so we synthesized and tested
the 5-methoxymethyl analog (31). We made this change with
the hope of introducing polar functionality that would improve
physical properties. This compound had similar potency to the
methyl analog (9). The individual enantiomers of both compounds
were separated using chiral chromatography (Chiracel AD column,
1% i-propanol/hexane eluent). The active enantiomers (9a and 31a)
were very potent blockers of KV1.5. Both compounds were tested
for block of hERG, sodium and calcium channels and 31a was found
to have >200-fold selectivity over these other ion channels (Table
5).
The pharmacokinetics of compounds 9a and 31a were investi-
gated in rats (Table 6).9 Compound 9a has intermediate systemic
clearance in rats. Steady-state volume of distribution was greater
than total body water, indicating significant extravascular distribu-
tion. Terminal half-life was 0.57 h in rats. Oral bioavailability (F)
was 51%. Compound 31a showed a longer half-life (1.5 h) with
similar clearance and bioavailability.
9
Vdss (L/kg)
a
Values are means from 3 animals.
inf = intra-arterial infusion for 10 min.
po = oral gavage.
b
c
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
0.3 mg/kg
1 mg/kg
AERP
3 mg/kg
VERP
10 mg/kg
Because of the acceptable pharmacokinetic profile and ion
channel selectivity, the methoxymethyl compound (31a) was cho-
sen for further in vivo characterization. The pharmacodynamic
activity was tested in a rabbit model which measured the effective
refractory period (ERP) in both atrium and ventricle (Fig. 2).10 Like
humans, rabbits express the IKur current in atrium but not ventri-
cle. The compound was dosed at 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10 mg/kg and
prolonged atrial ERP by >20% at a dose of 3 mg/kg. There was no
effect on ventricular ERP reflecting the selectivity for KV1.5 over
ventricular ion channels.
In conclusion, we have successfully replaced the amides of
known IKur blockers (1, 2) with benzimidazole. We have partially
optimized the substituents on the aromatic ring and nitrogen of
the benzimidazole and the substituent at the 5-position of the
dihydropyrazolopyrimidine ring. We discovered compound 31a
to be a very potent and selective blocker of KV1.5. This compound
also had good oral bioavailability in rats and showed a significant
pharmacodynamic effect in rabbits. For these reasons it was cho-
sen for further preclinical development.
Figure 2. Pharmacodymanic effects of 31a in rabbit.
References and notes
1. Wattigney, W. A.; Mensah, G. A.; Croft, J. B. Circulation 2003, 108, 711–716.
2. Feinberg, W. M.; Blackshear, J. L.; Laupacais, A., et al Arch. Intern. Med. 1995,
155, 469–473; Go, A. E.; Hylek, E. M.; Phillips, K. A.; Chang, Y-C.; Henault, L. E.;
Selby, J. V.; Singer, D. E. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2001, 285, 2370–2375.
3. Wolf, P. A.; Mitchell, J. B.; Baker, C. S., et al Arch. Intern. Med. 1998, 158, 229–
234.
4. Amos, G. J.; Wettwer, E.; Li, Q.; Himmel, H. M.; Ravens, U. Circulation 1994, 90,
I-581a; Li, G. R.; Feng, J.; Yue, L.; Carrier, M.; Nattel, S. Circ. Res. 1996, 78, 689–
696.
5. Yang, T.; Snyders, D.; Roden, D. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 2001, 38, 737–744.
6. Wang, Z.; Fermini, B.; Nattel, S. Circ. Res. 1993, 73, 1061–1076; Feng, J.; Wible,
B.; Li, G. R.; Wang, Z.; Nattel, S. Circ. Res. 1997, 80, 572–579.
7. Vacarro, W.; Huynh, T.; Lloyd, J.; Atwal, K. S.; Finlay, H. J.; Levesque, P. C.;
Conder, M. L.; Jenkins-West, T.; Shi, H.; Sun, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, I18,
6381–6385.
8. Snyders, D. J.; Tamkun, M. M.; Bennet, P. B. J. Gen. Physiol. 1993, 101, 513–543.
9. Compound 9a was administered to rats, as a solution in polyethylene glycol
200:ethanol:water (1:1:1). Plasma was prepared from each blood sample by