Inorganic Chemistry
Communication
PCNHCP pincer complex 2 is a good catalyst for the Z-selective
hydroboration of terminal alkynes and one of the few earth-
abundant metal alternatives.6 However, for aliphatic alkynes
the observed stereoselectivity is lower than the state-of-the-art
as reported by Chirik and Kirchner and a limitation of the
catalyst.
A clear advantage of the herein reported method is, however,
that by controlling the temperature, catalyst selectivity could
be selectively switched from the (Z)-vinylboronate to the (E)-
vinylboronate (Figure 2). To illustrate, products 5a, 5b, 5f, 5i,
tional isotope labeling experiments with phenylacetylene-d1 did
not provide additional information in order to discern between
the different types of 1,1-trans hydroboration pathways; e.g., a
metal vinylidene or syn-hydrometalation based pathway.11
To gain further mechanistic insight into the herein reported
hydroboration, we performed a series of stoichiometric
experiments. The addition of 1 equiv of HBpin to complex 2
led to the exclusive formation of [(PCNHCP)Fe(H)(μ-
H)2Bpin)] (Scheme 1; 3), which might be an important
catalytic intermediate. Such a proposal would certainly be
consistent with the results reported by Kirchner and Leitner
who have shown that their analogous iron and ruthenium
complexes ([(PNP)Fe(H)(μ-H)2Bpin)]) and ([(PNP)Ru-
(H)(μ-H)2Bpin)]) are competent precatalyst for the Z-
selective hydroboration of alkynes.4c,6a However, under the
herein reported reaction conditions, complex 3 gave 15% yield
of the (Z)-vinylboronate after 24 h, suggesting that 3 is an off-
cycle species rather than an active (pre)catalyst. It is possible
that the poor activity might be related to the reactivity of the
Fe−H bond. Recent studies have shown that for a related iron
species [(PNP)Fe(H)(μ-H)2BH2], the Fe−H bond is quite
stable and unreactive toward alkynes.6a To verify for our
system, we have synthesized the corresponding complex
[(PCNHCP)Fe(H)(μ-H)2BH2] (4) and found out that 4 is
also catalytically inactive. These data imply that the Fe−H
bonds in 3 and 4 are not reactive enough to initiate the
hydroboration of terminal alkynes.
Because neither the isotope labeling experiments nor the
stoichiometric experiments provided clear evidence for a metal
vinylidene or syn-hydrometalation pathway, we attempted to
isolate an iron(II) bis(acetylide) species that might be formed
upon the addition of the alkyne to iron complex 2. Metal-
acetylides have been shown by both Chirik and Kirchner to be
relevant intermediates in the syn-hydrometalation pathway.6b,9
Unfortunately, adding 2 equiv of alkyne to complex 2 resulted
in rapid alkyne dimerization, even when trimethylsilylacetylene
was used. Not dismayed by the additional reactivity of 2 (vide
infra), we realized that such intermediates might also be
generated by the addition of phenylacetylene to complex 1 in
the presence of base. Although the bis(acetylide)iron(II)
species could still not be isolated, the addition of phenyl-
acetylene to complex 1 in the presence of HBpin and base
(NaHMDS) resulted in the formation of the corresponding
(Z)-vinylboronate ester, which is consistent with the
observations by Kirchner and co-workers (Figure S80).9
Because the reactivities of complexes 1 and 2 in these
experiments are identical to that observed by Kirchner and co-
workers, and other mechanistic studies have proven to be
inconclusive (vide supra), we believe that it is plausible that a
similar mechanism might be operating akin to that proposed
Because in the above-mentioned experiments alkyne
dimerization was observed, we explored this reaction in more
detail.12 The addition of phenylacetylene to a solution complex
2 (0.5 mol %) in THF gave the corresponding enyne in
quantitative yield and with exclusive Z selectivity. At present,
the substrate scope is limited to aromatic acetylenes such as,
tolyl-, biaryl-, arylhalide-, anisole-, and thiophene-substituted
acetylenes (Table 2). All of these substrates give quantitative
conversion within 2 h to the corresponding (Z)-enynes.
Aliphatic alkynes, such as 1-octyne, only produced an
intractable mixture of products. Compared to the state-of-the-
art for earth-abundant metals,12a the obtained Z selectivity in
Figure 2. (Top) Temperature dependent stereoselective synthesis of
E- and Z-vinylboronate esters. (Bottom) Selective formation of 6a,
6b, 6f, 6i, 6n, and 6l with catalyst 2 under elevated temperatures (50
°C).
5n, and 5l are selectively converted to the (E)-vinylboronate
esters (6) after stirring the reaction mixture for an additional 4
h at slightly elevated temperatures (50 °C). The corresponding
(E)-vinylboronate esters were isolated with excellent stereo-
selectivity (E/Z ≥ 99:1) and in near quantitative yields.
(Figure 2). In the absence of a catalyst, the isolated Z-
vinylboronate esters did not convert to their corresponding
(E)-isomers.
The mechanism for Z-selective hydroboration has been
explored for both earth-abundant and precious metal catalysts.
For earth-abundant metals, Chirik and Kirchner proposed a
mechanism centered on the syn-hydrometalation of an
alkynylboronate intermediate.6b,9 In contrast, for precious
metal catalysts such as rhodium, iridium, and ruthenium,
Miyaura and Leitner proposed a metal vinylidene pathway.4c,5
Both mechanisms feature an overall 1,1-trans addition of the
borane to the alkyne. Recently, a more rare 1,2-trans addition
was also described.4a,10 To distinguish between the 1,1-trans or
1,2-trans hydroboration mechanism, we performed a series of
isotope labeling studies. Under the optimized reaction
conditions, deuterium labeling experiments with DBpin and
phenylacetylene resulted in almost exclusive incorporation of
Incorporation of the deuterium label at the β-carbon rules
out a 1,2-trans-hydroboration mechanistic pathway that has
been recently reported for copper10 and ruthenium.4a Addi-
C
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX