L. Fomina et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1074 (2014) 534–541
535
take orientations ortho, meta and para. All of them show a large
electronic delocalization, which makes them important targets
for high conductivity. Particularly, we will focus on the para ana-
logue, which has a curious geometry that can give it a large way
for electronic transport. This work is part of a research in which
our group has published some interesting results [6–8].
In this paper we report the structural characterization of
para-hyperbranched polymer and a theoretical study to under-
stand the nature of its properties. The molecule of the para-
hyperbranched compound is shown in Fig. 1 and its synthesis
was reported in [6]. It has been previously characterized by means
of infrared and NMR spectroscopy [9].
allowed to cool to room temperature. The mixture was diluted
with excess of acidified water. The precipitate was collected by
filtration and dried in vacuum. Method B. A mixture of compound
3 (0.5 g, 2.15 mmol), copper (I) chloride (0.05 g, 0.5 mmol) in diox-
ane (10 mL) was refluxed under nitrogen for 24 h at 70 °C in an oil
bath and allowed to cool to room temperature. The solution was
diluted with excess of acidified water. The precipitate was
collected by filtration and dried in vacuum.
Electrical conductivity measurements
The para-hyperbranched compound is partially soluble in
acetone; however, it was not possible to produce a continuous
homogenous film. The measurement of its conductivity was car-
ried out as a powder sample in a specially designed cell. This cell
consists of a transparent polystyrene tube, PSC, and two cylindrical
steel electrodes with a diameter, D = 3.19 mm. The powder sample
was pressed between the steel electrodes and the final samples
Experimental part
Synthesis [6]
Synthesis of the monomer compound
thickness, L = 1.46 mm was measured with
a Vernier scale
(Fig. 2). Then the cell was placed inside a microscope hot stage
adapted to heat uniformly the samples region. Conductivity mea-
surements were carried out as a function of the temperature using
and LCR meter. The measurements were carried out at 20 Hz fre-
quency. The initial temperature was 10 °C and then the sample
was heated at a ratio of 3.5 °C/min until a temperature of 50 °C
was reached and cooled again at a ratio of 1 °C/min.
(1) 4-(N-Boc-amino)phenylacetylene. To a solution of di-tert-
butyl dicarbonate (BOC2O) (27.56 g, 126.28 mmol) in
42 mL THF, was added aminophenylacetylene (4.85 g,
41.39 mmol). Solution was stirred and refluxed for three
hours. The solvent was removed in vacuum and the product
was purified by column chromatography using hexane–
ethyl acetate 10:1–5:1 as eluent.
(2) 4,40-Di(N-Boc-amino)diphenyldiacetylene. To a solution of
compound 1 (2.00 g, 9.2 mmol) in 20 mL isopropanol was
added (0.025 g, 0.252 mmol) of copper chloride and 0.3 mL
of N,N,N0,N0-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), the mix-
ture was stirring under oxygen atmosphere for 3 h, and
resulting solution was added to acidified water. The product
was separated by filtration, dried in vacuum and purified by
recrystallization from hexane.
Microscopy analysis
The para-hyperbranched sample was observed by optical
microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Since the sample
is partially soluble in acetone, two different samples were pre-
pared. The first sample was a mixture of powder with deionized
water (0.1% wt) and dispersed by 15 min in an ultrasonic bath.
The second sample was prepared by mixing the powder sample
in acetone to study the dissolved part of the para-hyperbranched
polymer. Drops of these two samples were poured on clean glass
slides and observed directly by optical microscopy. Different illu-
mination techniques were used: bright field, polarize light and
dark field to enhance the sample contrast with the glass substrate.
The sample for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was pre-
pared by pouring a drop from the deionized water mixture. After
water evaporates, the sample was coated with a thin layer of gold
for its observation under the SEM.
(3) 4, 40-Diaminodiphenyldiacetylene. To a suspension of 1.25 g
(2.89 mmol) of compound 2 in 110 mL of MeOH was added
125 mL of concentrated HCl, and the mixture was stirred
for 42 h at room temperature. The supernate was pipetted
off, and the solid was stirred in 100 mL of acetone overnight,
after which it was filtered off, washed four times with 15 mL
of acetone, and pumped dry.
Synthesis of para-hyperbranched compound
Method A. A mixture of compound 3 (0.1 g, 0.43 mmol), copper
(I) chloride (0.05 g, 0.5 mmol) in 10 mL dimethylformamide was
refluxed under nitrogen for 24–48 h at 110 °C in an oil bath and
Computational details
All structures have been optimized at B3PW91/3-21G using the
Gaussian09 code [10]. For all geometries, the starting point was a
non-symmetric structure. For the third and fourth generation,
before the last optimization the structure was very near C2 symme-
try, so we force to this symmetry and optimized again. The final
structure with lower energy is C2.
Fig. 2. Schematic cell for impedance measurements. Stainless Steel Cylindrical
Electrodes (SSE), Transparent Polystyrene Tube (PSC), Semi Cylindrical Copper
Cover (CC). The electrode radio is D and the sample thickness is L.
Fig. 1. Para-hyperbranched polymer.