Tsujihara et al.
JOCArticle
SCHEME 1. PdII-Catalyzed Intramolecular Oxidative Ami-
nocarbonylation of Alkenyl Amide Derivatives
the enantioselective intramolecular oxidative aminocarbony-
lation of alkenylureas catalyzed by a Pd-SPRIX complex as
well as the intriguing properties of SPRIXs.
Results and Discussion
Establishment of Reaction Conditions. We previously re-
ported the high utility of SPRIXs 3 for the Pd-catalyzed
enantioselective cyclizations of alkenyl alcohols4b and ami-
nocarbonylation of alkenylamides.8 The alkene moiety of
the substrates was efficiently activated toward intramolecu-
lar attack of the nucleophile through coordination to the
Pd-SPRIX catalyst. It was therefore anticipated that
SPRIXs would also exhibit an acceleration effect in enantio-
selective intramolecular oxidative aminocarbonylation of
alkenylurea 1.9 To our delight, the reaction of N-2,2-di-
methylpent-4-enyl-N0-p-toluenesulfonylurea (1a) proceeded
enantioselectively in the presence of a catalytic amount of (P,
R,R)-i-Pr-SPRIX 3a. Thus, 1a was treated with 10 mol % of
[Pd(MeCN)4](BF4)2, 11 mol % of 3a, and 2 equiv of p-
benzoquinone in MeOH at 0 °C under a carbon monoxide
atmosphere to give 66% ee of the desired cyclic β-amino acid
derivative 2a in 94% yield (Table 1, entry 1).10 When (P,R,
R)-3b and (P,R,R)-3c bearing smaller substituents on the
isoxazoline rings were employed as the chiral ligands, 2a was
obtained quantitatively with 25% ee and 15% ee, respec-
tively (entries 2 and 3). The reaction with (P,R,R)-H-SPRIX
3d also produced 2a in 41% yield, albeit with lower stereo-
selectivity (entry 4).11 Axially chiral bis(isoxazoline) ligand
(R)-4 developed by our group12 turned out to be ineffective
(entry 5). It should be noted that Pd complexes with other
known chiral ligands such as (R)-BINAP, (-)-sparteine,
(S,S)-t-Bu-BOX, and (S,S)-i-Pr-BOXAX did not promote
the aminocarbonylation of 1a at all even at 25 °C (entries
6-9).13 Background reactions were minimal under condi-
tions without ligand, resulting in only a trace amount of 2a
(entry 10). Furthermore, chiral Pd complex 5, which is known to
be an effective catalyst for asymmetric Wacker-type cyclizations
of o-allylphenols,14 did not work in this aminocarbonylation
furnished lactones bearing a bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane skeleton
with high enantioselectivity. Being encouraged by these find-
ings, we envisioned a palladium-catalyzed enantioselective
intramolecular oxidative aminocarbonylation of alkenyl
amides producing optically active cyclic β-amino acid deriva-
tives, in which both the chiral center and the pyrrolidine
framework were constructed in a single step (Scheme 1).5-7
If this reaction could be promoted enantioselectively, it is
expected to be an efficient synthetic method for preparation of
optically active cyclic β-amino acid derivatives. According to
our initial study, the use of SPRIXs was found to be required
for obtaining enantioselectivity in the catalytic cyclization.8
However, despite the unique benefits of the Pd-SPRIX
catalyst, the enantioselectivity of the intramolecular oxidative
aminocarbonylation was moderate. We therefore decided to
reinvestigate the reaction conditions in order to attain highly
enantioselective formation of optically active cyclic β-amino
acid derivatives. Herein we report a detailed investigation of
(3) For a review, see: Bajracharya, G. B.; Arai, M. A.; Koranne, P. S.;
Suzuki, T.; Takizawa, S.; Sasai, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2009, 82, 285–302.
(4) (a) Arai, M. A.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1795–1797. (b)
Arai, M. A.; Kuraishi, M.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
2907–2908. (c) Muthiah, C.; Arai, M. A.; Shinohara, T.; Arai, T.; Takizawa,
S.; Sasai, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5201–5204. (d) Takizawa, S.; Yogo,
J.; Tsujihara, T.; Onitsuka, K.; Sasai, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692,
495–498. (e) Bajracharya, G. B.; Koranne, P. S.; Tsujihara, T.; Takizawa, S.;
Onitsuka, K.; Sasai, H. Synlett 2009, 310–314. (f) Tsujihara, T.; Takenaka,
K.; Onitsuka, K.; Hatanaka, M.; Sasai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
3452–3453.
(5) (a) Hegedus, L. S.; Allen, G. F.; Olsen, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 3583–3587. (b) Hegedus, L. S.; McKearin, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 2444–2451. (c) Takahata, H.; Banba, Y.; Momose, T. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 445–448. (d) Ham, W.-H.; Jung, Y. H.; Lee, K.; Oh, C.-
Y.; Lee, K.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3247–3248. (e) Oh, C.-Y.; Kim, K.-
(9) For recent representative examples on the cyclization of alkenylurea,
€
~
see: (a) Streuff, J.; Hovelmann, C. H.; Nieger, M.; Muniz, K. J. Am. Chem.
ꢀ
S.; Ham, W.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2133–2136. (f) Szolcsanyi, P.;
Gracza, T.; Koman, M.; Pronayova, N.; Liptaj, T. Chem. Commun. 2000,
~ €
Soc. 2005, 127, 14586–14587. (b) Muniz, K.; Hovelmann, C. H.; Streuff, J. J.
~ €
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 763–773. (c) Muniz, K.; Hovelmann, C. H.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
471–472. (g) Szolcsanyi, P.; Gracza, T.; Koman, M.; Pronayova, N.; Liptaj,
T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2579–2597. (h) Bates, R. W.; Sa-Ei, K.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ ꢀ
Campos-Gomez, E.; Barluenga, J.; Gonzalez, J. M.; Streuff, J.; Nieger, M.
~ ꢀ
Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 776–788. (d) Muniz, K.; Streuff, J.; Chavez, P.;
€ ~
Hovelmann, C. H. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 1248–1255. (e) Muniz, K.;
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4225–4227. (i) Szolcsanyi, P.; Gracza, T.; Spanik, I.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1357–1360.
€
ꢀ
Hovelmann, C. H.; Streuff, J.; Campos-Gomez, E. Pure Appl. Chem. 2008,
80, 1089–1096. (f) Iglesias, A.; Muniz, K. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10563–
10569. (g) Muniz, K.; Iglesias, A.; Fang, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5591–
5593. (h) Cochran, B. M.; Michael, F. E. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5039–5042.
(10) The results using other solvents: toluene: trace, 31% ee; CH2Cl2:
24% yield, 12% ee; MeCN: 40% yield, 29% ee; THF: 34% yield, 47% ee;
EtOH: 64% yield, 65% ee. See the Supporting Information.
(6) Tamaru and co-workers extensively studied the corresponding none-
nantioselective Pd-catalyzed oxidative aminocarbonylation of alkenyl
amines. See: (a) Tamaru, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Kawamura, S.; Ochiai, H.;
Yoshida, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 4479–4482. (b) Tamaru, Y.; Yoshi-
da, Z. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 334, 213–223. (c) Tamaru, Y.; Hojo, M.;
Higashimura, H.; Yoshida, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3994–4002. (d)
Tamaru, Y.; Hojo, M.; Yoshida, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5731–5741. (e)
Tamaru, Y.; Tanigawa, H.; Itoh, S.; Kimura, M.; Tanaka, S.; Fugami, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 631–634. (f) Harayama, H.; Okuno, H.; Takaha-
shi, Y.; Kimura, M.; Fugami, K.; Tanaka, S.; Tamaru, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 7287–7290. (g) Harayama, H.; Abe, A.; Sakado, T.; Kimura, M.;
Fugami, K.; Tanaka, S.; Tamaru, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2113–2122. (h)
Tamaru, Y.; Kimura, M. Synlett 1997, 749–757.
(11) When (P,R,R)-3d was employed, Pd black was gradually formed
after replacement by CO. As a result of this deactivation of catalyst, the
chemical yield of 2a was diminished. In the reaction, a combination of 10 mol
% of Pd(OCOCF3)2 and 22 mol % of (M,S,S)-3d showed better result. A
61% yield of 2a was obtained with 54% ee when the reaction was conducted
at -20 °C for 7.1 days as reported in ref 8.
(12) Shinohara, T.; Wakita, K.; Arai, M. A.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H. Hetero-
cycles 2003, 59, 587–593.
(7) Organocatalysts has also been used in the preparation of optically
active homoproline derivatives, see: (a) Takasu, K.; Maiti, S.; Ihara, M.
(13) Abbreviations: (R)-BINAP
=
(R)-2,20-bis(diphenylphosphino)-
1,10-binaphthyl; (S,S)-t-Bu-BOX = 2,2-bis[(4S)-4-tert-butyl-2-oxazolin-2-
yl]propane; (S,S)-i-Pr-BOXAX = (S)-2,20-bis[(4S)-4-isopropyl-2-oxazolin-
2-yl]-1,10-binaphthyl.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Heterocycles 2003, 59, 51–55. (b) Fustero, S.; Jimenez, D.; Moscardo, J.;
Catalan, S.; del Pozo, C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5283–5286. (c) Carlson, E. C.;
ꢀ
Rathbone, L. K.; Yang, H.; Collett, N. D.; Carter, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
73, 5155–5158. (d) Fustero, S.; Moscardo, J.; Jimenez, D.; Perez-Carrion, M.
(14) (a) Hosokawa, T.; Miyagi, S.; Murahashi, S.-I.; Sonoda, A. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1978, 687–688. (b) Hosokawa, T.; Uno, T.; Inui, S.;
Murahashi, S.-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2318–2323. (c) Hosokawa, T.;
Okuda, C.; Murahashi, S.-I. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1282–1287.
ꢀ
ꢀ
D.; Sanchez-Rosello, M.; del Pozo, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 9868–9872.
(8) Shinohara, T.; Arai, M. A.; Wakita, K.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 711–714.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 24, 2009 9275