1756
Y. Xu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 1754–1757
Table 2
Lead in organs of three doses of 3 g treated micea
Compd
Dose (mmol/kg)
Lead in following organs
Femurs
Brain
Kidney
Liver
NS
3g
0.2 ml
0.6
0.4
23.70 3.08
9.64 1.02b
11.10 1.30c
17.21 2.11d
2.04 0.40
0.84 0.36b
1.22 0.46c
1.69 0.38d
8.92 1.46
5.90 1.30b
7.09 1.36c
7.68 1.40c
7.22 1.64
2.77 1.03b
3.82 1.36c
5.81 1.52d
0.2
For femurs lead: (b) compared to NS and 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.01, to 0.4 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.05; (c) compared to NS and 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.01; (d) compared to NS
p <0.01. For brain lead: (b) compared to NS and 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.01, to 0.4 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.05; (c) compared to NS p <0.01, to 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.05; (d)
compared to NS p <0.05. For kidney lead: (b) compared to NS and 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.01, to 0.4 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.05; (c) compared to NS p <0.01, to 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g
p <0.05; (d) compared to NS p <0.01. For liver lead: (b) compared to NS and 0.2 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.01, to 0.4 mmol/kg of 3g p <0.05; (c) compared to NS p <0.01, to 0.2 mmol/
kg of 3g p <0.05; (d) compared to NS p <0.01.
a
Date is represented with mean SD lg of Pb/g of organ, NS = normal saline = vehicle, n = 12.
Table 3
The apparent permeability coefficients of 1 and 3e,f,j
10% of the human population. To predict hepatotoxicity two scores
(0 represents non-hepatotoxin and 1 represents hepatotoxin) are
defined. The predicted scores (0.019–0.317) of NaDMS, 1 and
3a–l are listed in Table 4. The data are much less than 1. This sug-
gests that NaDMS, 1 and 3a–l possess no hepatotoxicity.
Compd
Papp  10À6 (cm/s)
A?B
B?A
A?B/B?A
DL-PA
NaDMS
1
3e
3f
3j
13.12
11.01
13.68
14.25
16.65
15.70
11.50
10.00
4.68
4.91
5.15
5.05
1.14
1.10
2.91
2.90
3.23
3.11
In conclusion, linking the mercapto groups with isopropyl and
introducing L-amino acid into the 5-carboxyl is a desirable struc-
tural modification of DMSA. This modification significantly in-
creases the brain-lead detoxification activity without increasing
the lead levels of other organs. This modification significantly in-
creases the membrane permeability and possibly increases the
capacity of blood–brain barrier permeability. These properties with
the non-hepatotoxin prediction together provide a promising de-
sign for brain-lead detoxification agents.
The standard deviations were generally less than 10% (n = 4); A?B, From apical side
to basolateral side; B?A, From basolateral side to apical side.
Table 4
ADMET hepatotoxicity probability of 3a–l
Acknowledgements
Compd
ADMET score
Compd
ADMET score
This work was finished in the Beijing area major laboratory of
peptide and small molecular drugs, supported by PHR (IHLB,
KZ200810025010, KM200910025009 and KM200710025010), the
National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (30801426), and
Special Project (2008ZX09401-002) of China.
NaDMS
1
3a
3b
3c
0.033
0.019
0.079
0.086
0.072
0.099
0.086
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
0.092
0.059
0.112
0.099
0.105
0.317
0.264
3d
3e
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, biological eval-
uation methods, synthetic data, analytical data, physical chemical
constants and spectral data) associated with this article can be
11.50 Â 10À6 cm/s of Papp values from the basolateral side to the
apical side, and defined the Papp values from the apical side to
the basolateral side to be 1.10-fold to 3.23-fold higher than the Papp
value from the basolateral side to the apical side. It is generally ac-
cepted that an actively absorbed compound shows much faster
transport from the apical to the basolateral direction and its Papp
value from the apical side to the basolateral side should be more
than 10 Â 10À6 cm/s.19 According to the Papp values from the apical
side to the basolateral side, DL-PA, NaDMS, 1 and 3e,f,j are trans-
ported actively across the Caco-2 cell monolayer. For 1 and 3e,f,j,
the Papp values from the apical side to the basolateral side are
2.90-fold to 3.23-fold higher than the Papp values from the basolat-
eral side to the apical side, while for NaDMS the Papp values from
the apical side to the basolateral side is only 1.10-fold higher than
the Papp values from the basolateral side to the apical side. The
comparison suggests that the present modification significantly
improves the membrane permeability and should be responsible
for the higher brain-lead detoxification activities of 1 and 3e,f,j.
The hepatotoxicities of 1 and 3e,f,j were calculated by using the
absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicity
(ADMET) program,20,21 which was developed from available litera-
ture data of 382 compounds known to exhibit liver toxicity or trig-
ger dose-related elevated aminotransferase levels in more than
References and notes
1. Nriagu, J.; Afeiche, M.; Linder, A.; Arowolo, T.; Ana, G.; Sridhar, M. K. C.;
Oloruntoba, E. O.; Obi, E.; Ebenebe, J. C.; Orisakwe, O. E.; Adesina, A. Int. J. Hyg.
Environ. Health 2008, 211, 591.
2. Liu, Z. P. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 309, 117.
3. Kachur, A. N.; Arzhanova, V. S.; Yelpatyevsky, P. V.; von Braun, M. C.; von
Lindern, I. H. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 303, 171.
4. Franco-Uria, A.; Lopez-Mateo, C.; Roca, E.; Fernandez-Marcos, M. L. J. Hazard.
Mater. 2009, 165, 1008.
5. Cheng, H.; Hu, Y. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 1134.
6. Takser, L.; Mergler, D.; Lafond, J. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2005, 27, 505.
7. Patra, M.; Bhowmik, N.; Bandopadhyay, B.; Sharma, A. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004,
52, 199.
8. Osterode, W.; Winker, R.; Bieglmayer, C.; Vierhapper, H. Bone 2004, 35, 942.
9. Rademachera, D. J.; Steinpreisa, R. E.; Weber, D. N. Pharmacol. Biochem. 2001,
70, 199.
10. Gurer, H.; Ercal, N. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 927.
11. Pachauri, V.; Saxena, G.; Mehta, A.; Mishra, D.; Flora, S. J. S. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 2009, 240, 255.
12. Flora, S. J. S.; Kannan, G. M.; Pant, B. P. Arch. Toxicol. 2002, 76, 269.
13. Meyer, P. A.; Brown, M. J.; Falk, H. Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. 2008, 659, 166.
14. Siao, F. Y.; Lu, J. F.; Wang, J. S.; Inbaraj, B. S.; Chen, B. H. J. Agric. Food. Chem.
2009, 57, 777.