Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
(Scheme 1A). Thus, aldehyde 613 was subjected to Krische’s
crotylation14 with 3-buten-2-yl acetate (7) and Ir catalyst 1115
to furnish alcohol 12 on a multigram scale in good yield with
excellent levels of diastereo- and enantiocontrol (72% yield,
20:1 dr, 98% ee).16 To access its coupling partner, allylic
bromide 817 was reacted with the bis-enolate of tert-butyl
acetoacetate (9) (NaH; then n-BuLi; then 8) to provide (Z)-
iodoolefin 13 in 84% yield. Construction of the intended (E,Z)
diene was achieved via Mizoroki−Heck coupling between
alcohol 12 and vinyl iodide 13 under conditions similar to
those reported by Jeffery18 [Pd(OAc)2, AgOAc] to afford β-
ketoesters 14 and 15 in excellent yield as a mixture of olefinic
isomers (88% yield, 98% brsm, 14:15 = 7:3, 62% overall for
14).19 This reaction was unproductive in the absence of
silver(I) salts (inset Table 1, Scheme 1A), indicating that a
cationic palladium center is critical for its success.20 To induce
macrolactonization, β-ketoesters 14 and 15 were heated to
reflux (PhMe, 4 Å MS, 125 °C, 15 min) to afford rigid β-
ketolactones 16 (70% yield) and 17 (65% yield) via the
intramolecular trapping of an in situ derived acylketene.21
While this transformation is commonly performed on small
scale with 1,3-dioxinones,22 our carefully tuned reaction
conditions (inset Table 2, Scheme 1A) have proven effective
on the gram scale. Next, stereoselective ketone reduction of 16
to form the desired secondary alcohol at C3 was investigated.
After screening a number of reducing agents (inset Table 3,
Scheme 1A), potassium triethylborohydride was identified (1.0
equiv, THF, −78 °C) as the optimal reagent,23 providing
alcohol 18 in 91% yield on gram scale as a single
diastereomer.24 Similarly, macrocyclic ketone 17 was cleanly
reduced to alcohol 19 in 88% yield as a single diastereomer.24
With macrocyclic dienes 18 and 19 in hand, we examined the
key transformation: a regio- and diastereoselective dihydrox-
ylation of the C6−C7 (Z)-trisubstituted olefin. Gratifyingly,
treatment of 18 with AD-mix-β under standard Sharpless
conditions afforded the desired triol 20 in 77% yield (85%
brsm) with complete regioselectivity and good diastereose-
lectivity (10:1 dr). The absolute configuration of 20 was
determined via X-ray crystallographic analysis (Scheme 1A).25
Conversely, the use of AD-mix-α gave C6−C7 diastereomer 21
in 68% yield with complete regioselectivity, albeit modest
diastereoselectivity (3:1 dr). In contrast to the catalyst-
controlled reaction outcomes observed with (E,Z) diene 18,
(Z,Z) diene 19 provided only triol 22 in either instance (i.e.,
AD-mix-α or AD-mix-β) in 81% yield. The absolute
configuration of 22 was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic
analysis of its C7-derived p-bromobenzoyl ester 24.26 The C10
angular methyl group likely induces a more sterically hindered
α face of the ring system, resulting in this striking example of
macrocyclic stereocontrol.27 To our knowledge, these are the
first examples of site- and stereoselective dihydroxylations of
macrocyclic conjugated dienes. Its displayed stereodivergence
permits entry to the natural product core and unexplored
chemical space (i.e., 20 and 21), obviates protecting groups,
and may find general use in the synthesis of complex
macrolides. Subsequent silicon-for-iodine exchange28 (NIS,
HFIP, 98% yield) provided vinyl iodide 25, a key intermediate
for accessing targets 1−3. Regioselective acetylation of the
allylic alcohol (Ac2O, 90% yield) afforded macrolide 26 in
seven steps (LLS) from building blocks 6−9. This sequence
proceeds reliably and offers unique opportunities for medicinal
chemistry efforts via stereodefined macrolides 16−22.
a
Scheme 2. Total Synthesis of H3B-8800 (3)
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) Cu(OAc)2 (0.02 equiv), 37 (0.02
equiv), PMHS (4.0 equiv), t-BuOH (4.0 equiv), PhMe, 0 → 22 °C, 4
h, 95% (94% ee); (b) 3.0 M HCl in MeOH, 60 °C, 4 h, 92%; (c)
LiAlH4 (1.0 equiv), THF, 0 °C, 30 min, 90%; (d) 41 (2.0 equiv), n-
Bu3P (2.0 equiv), THF, 0 °C, 2 h, 51%; (e) 43 (1.0 equiv), py (5.0
equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 → 22 °C, 6 h, 82%; (f) n-Bu2SnO (1.1 equiv), 4 Å
MS, PhMe, 100 °C, 12 h; then 45 (2.5 equiv), Et3N (3.4 equiv), 80
°C, 36 h, 81%; (g) 44 (3.0 equiv), 46 (1.0 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1
equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv), PhH, 80 °C, 4 h; then 36 (0.5 equiv), H2O
(12 equiv), 22 °C, 1 h, 96% [(E,E):(Z,E) = 5:1, 80% overall for 3].
PMHS = polymethylhydrosiloxane; py = pyridine; tol = tolyl.
The synthesis of vinyl boronate 35 is depicted in Scheme 1B.
Cross metathesis of terminal olefins 429 and 530 under the
influence of Grubbs second generation catalyst (27) provided
dihydroxy olefin 28 [64% yield, (E):(Z) = 7:1, 56% overall for
28]. Exposure of diol 28 to Shi’s epoxidation conditions31 (29,
Oxone, K2CO3) produced epoxy diol 30 stereoselectively in
76% yield. Chemoselective oxidation of the primary alcohol
(PIDA, TEMPO, 80% yield) generated the corresponding
aldehyde 31.32 It was envisioned that vinyl boronate 35 could
be obtained from 31 through alkyne 33 via application of the
Ohira−Bestmann modification of the Seyferth−Gilbert homo-
logation.33 To avoid epimerization at C16, we adapted
successful reports from Nicolaou and Fu
̈
rstner,34 utilizing
preactivated Ohira−Bestmann reagent 3235 at low temperature
(NaOMe, THF, −78 → −50 °C), which pleasingly provided
alkyne 33 in 85% yield without hydroxy group protection.
Alkyne borylcupration catalyzed by an N-heterocyclic carbene
(NHC)-ligated Cu(I) complex (34, CuCl, B2pin2, 66%
yield)36 afforded vinyl boronate 35 in five steps (LLS) from
building blocks 4 and 5.
4917
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 4915−4920