very important since the carbonyl carbon atom plays a
decisive role in numerous organic reactions.
Figure 2 shows the scheme of the 2D UF-HMBC sequence
used. This sequence consists basically of a continuous spatial
encoding ultrafast HSQC sequence in which the delay d is set
to 25 ms in order to monitor 2J and 3J couplings of 10 Hz.7
In this UF scheme, contrary to traditional approaches, the
spectral widths in both indirect and direct dimensions are
dependent on each other. The greater the spectral width that
must be covered in both dimensions, the poorer the digital
resolution in the indirect domain.8 Furthermore, the spectral
width and therefore the resolution in the indirect domain
depends on the strength Ga and duration Ta of the decoding
gradient, and both of these are limited. Because a wide
spectral range in the indirect domain needed to be covered
to detect the possible intermediates, we decided to monitor
two different spectral windows in this dimension. For this
purpose we alternated the same sequence with different
indirect dimension frequency offsets. The acquisition of these
two data sets was repeated during the progress of the reaction.
A total of 219 UF-HMBC spectra for each spectral window
were recorded over a total time of 112 min. Each single
spectrum was measured for 5.37 s, and a measurement was
repeated every 10 s. For acquisition conditions see Support-
ing Information.
Although the chemistry of triflic anhydrides and their
reactions with carbonyl compounds is well-known, some
mechanistic questions still remain open.6 Thus, it has been
accepted for many years that the reaction consists of the
electrophilic attack of the anhydride on the carbonyl oxygen;
this results in the formation of the short-lived (trifluoromethane-
sulfonyl)carbenium ion (2) (Figure 1). Despite this no data about
Figure 1. Reaction possibilities from ketones and triflic anhydride.
the structure and kinetic behavior of the crucial intermediate 2
are yet known. Depending on the nature of the carbonyl
compound and the reaction conditions, there are different
possibilities for 2; it can lead directly to vinyl triflates or to
different products after trapping by an external nucleophile.
In this paper we studied the organic reaction described above
and monitored how the carbonyl carbon atom evolves during
the process. Our aim is to identify possible intermediates
formed. We chose a simple aliphatic-aromatic ketone, acetophe-
none, as the model compound and studied its reaction with triflic
anhydride in the presence of an excess of acetonitrile acting as
nuclephile and the solvent. This leads to pyrimidines as main
products. Labeled 13C-carbonyl-acetophenone and [D3]acetoni-
trile were used as reactants. 13C-Carbonyl-labeled ketone ensures
the detection of short life intermediates and overcomes sensitiv-
ity problems. Attempts done with unlabeled ketones failed. The
use of [D3]acetonitrile eliminates the neccessity of solvent
suppression. The reaction was carried out inside a standard 500
MHz spectrometer with conventional hardware and a 5 mm NMR
tube. The reactants were added with a fast mixing device. For
experimental details and procedure see Supporting Information.
Figure 3 shows a series of six representative 2D UF-
HMBC spectra recorded (spectra 1-6). These spectra
correspond to the first window studied. The ranges examined
were 210-150 ppm for 13C, which covers the carbonyl
1
region and 9-2 ppm for H. Spectra were numbered 1-6
(referred to as HMBC-1, etc). Cross-peaks assigned to
starting and final products were confirmed using standard
1D and 2D spectra (see Supporting Information).
Spectrum HMBC-1 (0.0 min) corresponds to the solution of
ketone 1 in [D3]acetonitrile before the addition of Tf2O.
HMBC-1 shows a cross-peak at 198.9-2.56 ppm due to the 2J
coupling between the carbonyl carbon and the methyl protons
of 1 (red arrow). The addition of Tf2O produced a small change
in the position of the cross-peak from 1. In HMBC-2, taken
1.02 min after the addition, a new cross-peak appeared at
195.2-3.26 ppm (green arrow). This peak intensified in
HMBC-3 (1.53 min), decreased clearly in HMBC-5 (33.2 min),
and remained close to the detection limit in HMBC-6 (76.4
min). Simultaneously, the cross-peak (167.4-8.38, blue arrow)
that belongs to the pyrimidine 5 increased its intensity (HMBC-3
to HMBC-6). The signal from 1 decreased (HMBC-1 to
HMBC-5) and is absent in HMBC-6.
In our opinion, this new cross-peak (green arrow) depicted
in Figure 3 belongs to the complex 2 formed from ketone 1
and triflic anhydride. The rise and fall of 2 during the reaction
clearly shows its character as intermediate. Structures of 1 and
2 are similar and therefore produce cross-peaks close to each
(6) (a) Garc´ıa Mart´ınez, A.; Herrera Ferna´ndez, A.; Moreno Jime´nez,
F.; Garc´ıa Fraile, A.; Subramanian, L. R.; Hanack, M. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
´
57, 1627. (b) Herrera, A.; Mart´ınez-Alvarez, R.; Ramiro, P.; Molero, D.;
´
Almy, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3026. (c) Herrera, A.; Mart´ınez-Alvarez,
R.; Chioua, M.; Chioua, R.; Sa´nchez, A. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 10053. (d)
Baraznenok, I. L.; Nenajdenko, V. G.; Balenkova, E. S. Tetrahedron 2000,
56, 3077.
Figure 2. Ultrafast two-dimensional HMBC implemented to
monitor changes on the carbonyl carbon atom.
(7) Shrot, Y.; Shapira, B.; Frydman, L. J. Magn. Reson. 2004, 171, 162.
(8) Frydman, L.; Lupulescu, A.; Scherf, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 9204.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010
145