7198
M. Sienkiewicz et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 7196–7198
amounts of the desired product. It is thought that the oxidation
may be hindered either by hydrogen bond formation between
the hydroxy group and the nitrogen atom of the tosylhydrazone
group or by steric congestion in the structure. Therefore, reduc-
tive deoxygenation of the tosylhydrazone group was investigated
at this stage. The use of NaBH4 in absolute ethanol16 or in DMF
with and without heating, as well as LAH,17 failed to give the de-
sired product. However, reduction with NaBH4 in a mixture of
acetic acid and MeOH gave the expected product 13 in 55% yield.
A better result was achieved using DIBAL-H.18
enantioselective deprotonation and the aldol reaction of tropinone.
Thus, by using our approach, the racemate or either enantiomer of
the 2-acyltropane derivative can be synthesized with high enantio-
meric purity (P90–99%) using LDA or the commercially available
chiral reagents, (R,R)- or (S,S)-N,N-bis(1-phenylethyl)amine hydro-
chloride.21 The natural enantiomer of ferrugine, which is not avail-
able using Bick’s chiral pool strategy4e starting from (ꢀ)-cocaine,
was synthesized for the first time.
Acknowledgements
When this reaction was carried out at 0 °C for 72 h the product
was obtained in 83% yield after purification on deactivated silica
gel (elution with dichloromethane saturated with NH3). Represen-
tative results on tosylhydrazone reductions are shown in Table 2.
Applying the optimized reduction method to the methyl analogue
12 provided exo-2-(1-hydroxyethyl)tropane 14 in 82% yield. The fi-
nal step was oxidation of the side-chain hydroxy group. Attempted
Swern oxidation gave poor results, but the use of typical Dess–
Martin oxidation (in dry dichloromethane with pyridine at rt for
22 h) provided ferrugine 3 and the methyl analogue 6 (Scheme
4), in 56% and 53% yields, respectively, after chromatography. Ana-
lytical data was in agreement with those reported in the litera-
ture.4e,6 Having devised a synthetic route to racemic ferrugine
the enantioselective synthesis of either enantiomer was realized
using the commercially available hydrochloride of chiral amine
10 (Scheme 3). Thus (ꢀ)-exo-2-(1-hydroxybenzyl)tropinone (ꢀ)-8
was prepared using (R,R)-N,N-bis(1-phenylethyl)amine hydrochlo-
ride8a and two equivalents of n-butyllithium. Following the litera-
ture procedure,8a the aldol product (ꢀ)-8 was isolated by
precipitation and crystallization in 80% yield and with an
ee P 99%. The tosylhydrazone (ꢀ)-11 was obtained in the next
step in 55% yield and with an ee P 99%.19 Reduction of (ꢀ)-11 with
DIBAL-H gave the chiral alcohol (ꢀ)-13 in 74% yield (ee P 99%) and
oxidation of the hydroxy group gave ent-ferrugine [(ꢀ)-3] in 56%
yield. Measurement of the enantiomeric excess of the final product
by 1H NMR in the presence of (+)-TFAE proved the high enantio-
meric purity, ee P 99%. However, the optical rotations of the syn-
We are grateful to the University of Bialystok (BST-125 and BW-
173) for financial support. We also thank Dr. L. Siergiejczyk for
assistance in recording NMR spectra.
References and notes
1. (a) Lounasmaa, M.. In The Alkaliods; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York,
1988; Vol. 33, (b) Clarke, R. L.. In The Alkaloids; Manske, R. H. F., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1977; Vol. 16, (c) Fodor, G.. In The Alkaloids; Manske, R. H. F.,
Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1971; Vol. 13, (d) Fodor, G.; Dharanipragada, R.
Nat. Prod. Rep. 1993, 9, 199–206; (e) Fodor, G.; Dharanipragada, R. Nat. Prod.
Rep. 1994, 11, 443–456.
2. Bick, I. R. C.; Gillard, J. W.; Woodruff, M. Chem. Ind. 1975, 794.
3. Swanson, K. L.; Albuquerque, E. X. Handbook Exp. Pharmacol. 1992, 102, 620–
621.
4. Selected papers: (a) Jonsson, S. Y.; Löfström, C. M. G.; Bäckvall, J.-E. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 8454–8457; (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Astle, C. J.; Rogers-Evans, M. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 1469–1471; (c) Katoh, T.; Kakiya, K.; Nakai, T.; Nakamura, S.; Nishide,
K.; Node, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2351–2358; (d) Gauthier, I.;
Royer, J.; Husson, H.-P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6704–6705; (e) Bick, I. R. C.;
Gillard, J. W.; Leow, H.-M. Aust. J. Chem. 1979, 32, 2537–2543; (f) Hernández, A.
S.; Thaler, A.; Castells, J.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 314–323; (g)
Davies, H. M. L.; Saikali, E.; Young, W. B. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5696–5700.
5. (a) Campbell, H. F.; Edwards, O. E.; Kolt, R. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 1372–1379;
(b) Einhorn, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1887, 20, 1221–1229.
6. Ahmed, S.; Baker, L. A.; Grainger, R. S.; Innocenti, P.; Quevedo, C. E. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 8116–8119.
7. Pollini, G. P.; Benetti, S.; De Risi, C.; Zanirato, V. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2434–
2454.
8. (a) Majewski, M.; Lazny, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5825–5830; (b) Bunn, B. J.;
Simpkins, N. S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 58, 533–534; (c) Bunn, B. J.; Simpkins, N. S.;
Spavold, Z.; Crimrnin, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 3113–3116; (d) Lee, J.
C.; Lee, K.; Cha, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4773–4775; (e) Majewski, M.; Zheng,
G.-Z. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 2618–2626.
9. (a) Yamamoto, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Inokawa, S.; Yamashita, M.; Armour, M. A.;
Nakashima, T. T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 49, 1364–1370; (b) Kabalka, G. W.;
Summers, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 46, 1217–1218; (c) Miller, V. P.; Yang, D. Y.;
Weigel, T. M.; Han, O.; Liu, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 54, 4175–4188.
10. Grieco, P. A.; Nishizawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 42, 1717–1720.
11. Alexakis, A.; Gille, S.; Prian, F.; Rosset, S.; Ditrich, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
1449–1451.
12. (a) Meyer, S. D.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 59, 7549–7552; (b) Dess, D.
B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 48, 4155–4156.
13. Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. v. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 89, 5505–5507.
14. (a) Liu, Y.; Vederas, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7856–7859; (b) Marx, M.;
Tidwell, T. T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 49, 788–793; (c) Chrisman, W.; Singaram, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2053–2056.
thesized product measured at two different concentrations (½a D
ꢀ100, c 1, CHCl3 and ½a D ꢀ29, c 0.3, CHCl3) did not compare well
with the literature value for natural ferrugine (½a D
+55, CHCl3),4e
ꢂ
ꢂ
ꢂ
however, the concentration at which the optical rotation of the
natural product was recorded was not given.20 The natural enan-
tiomer of ferrugine was also obtained via the same reaction se-
quence using (S,S)-N,N-bis(1-phenylethyl)amine hydrochloride
(S,S-10) for the tropinone deprotonation. The enantiomers of the
methyl analogues were equally accessible from enantiomers of
aldols 9 (Scheme 4). The acetyl tropane 6 was, however, present
admixed with a small amount of its exo diastereomer (2b-acetyl-
tropane, ca. 15%).
15. More, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001–3003.
16. (a) Tavernier, D.; Hosten, N.; Anteunis, M. Synthesis 1979, 613–614; (b)
Hutchins, R. O.; Maryanoff, B.; Milewski, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 93, 1793–
1794.
In summary, we have developed a simple, four-step, route to
2-acyl tropanes based on aldol deoxygenation via tosylhydrazone
reduction. The method was used for the first enantioselective syn-
thesis of ferrugine and its methyl analogue (2-acetyltropane) using
17. Kutney, J. P.; Singh, A. K. Can. J. Chem. 1983, 61, 1111–1114.
18. Lightner, D. A.; Paquette, L. A.; Chayangkoon, P.; Lin, H. S.; Peterson, J. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 53, 1969–1973.
19. All enantiomeric excesses were measured by 1H NMR in the presence of (+)-
2,2,2-trifluoro-1-(9-anthranyl)ethanol, (+)-TFAE.
20. The substantial difference in the values recorded at c = 1 and c = 0.3 clearly
showed that the specific rotation of (ꢀ)-ferrugine is dependent on
Table 2
Selected results on the deoxygenative reduction of the tosylhydrazone group in 11
concentration and that the literature value must have been taken at
concentration between 0.3 and 1.0.
a
Entry
Reaction conditions
Yield (%)
21. All new compounds gave satisfactory analytical data: (ꢀ)-2
a-Benzoyltropane,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NaBH4, EtOH, 35 °C
NaBH4, DMF, 80 °C
NaBH4, MeOH, AcOH, 80 °C
LAH, THF, rt
LAH, THF, reflux
DIBAL, CH2Cl2, 0 °C
NaH, PhH
—
—
[(ꢀ)-ent-ferrugine], (ꢀ)-3. Purification using preparative thin layer
chromatography (PTLC) (5% MeOH/CH2Cl2+NH3) gave a yellow oil (0.110 g,
56%). Rf = 0.5 (10% MeOH/CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 7.98–7.92 (m,
2H), 7.57–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.43 (m, 2H), 3.82–3.76 (m, 1H), 3.35 (d,
J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.20–3.15 (m, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.05–1.69 (m, 5H), 1.62–1.45
(m, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 201.5, 136.3, 132.8, 128.6, 128.4, 63.6,
61.1, 47.7, 40.3, 29.8, 26.0, 22.7, 18.5; mmax (CHCl3) 1675 (C@O) cmꢀ1 HRMS
55
—
33a
83
—
(EI): M+, found 229.1460, C15H19NO requires 229.1467; ee P 99%;½a D20
ꢀ100 (c
ꢂ
1, CHCl3), ꢀ29 (c 0.3, CHCl3); lit.4e data for (+)-enantiomer ½a 1D9
ꢂ
+55, (CHCl3).
a
Calculated from the 1H NMR spectra of crude reaction mixtures.