Bradford et al.
JOCNote
and 450 °C.13 Hopf devised a route to 1 through the inter-
mediacy of 2-ethynyl-1,3-butadiene, which in turn was pre-
pared through both pyrolytic dehydration of an alcohol
precursor over molecular sieves (300 °C)14 and an ingenious
rearrangement of an allenyne isomer (500 °C).15
Since these syntheses require somewhat specialized labo-
ratory techniques and, in some cases, quite lengthy stepwise
syntheses of precursors, we recently developed one-step,
cross-coupling approaches to [3]dendralene 1 from commer-
cially available starting materials (chloroprene and vinyl
bromide) using standard laboratory methods.16 Despite
their simplicity and brevity, these recent approaches have
the drawback that they allow access to the hydrocarbon only
as a solution in THF. In light of the obvious need for solvent-
free, multigram samples of the hydrocarbon, we devised a
simple new route to [3]dendralene that employs standard
laboratory equipment. The new preparation of [3]dendra-
lene 1 is depicted in Scheme 2.
is stable and easily handled.12 In fact, the perceived instability
of the hydrocarbon has led to the development of synthetic
equivalents of the triene.19 To our knowledge, experimental
findings relating to the propensity of 1 to undergo dimerization
and/or polymerization have been reported in three papers.
In the first,5 1 was reported to form a gelatinous mass on storage
for 36 h at -5 °C and was also said to form a liquid dimer
(structure not identified) on standing at room temperature for
2 days. The second report noted the dimerization of the hydro-
carbon both during its formation through pyrolysis and
distillation (structure not identified).6 Trahanovsky7 describes
0.1-0.4 M solutions of the hydrocarbon in benzene as reason-
ably stable at room temperature and a dimerization in these
solutions over 22 h at 95 °C to produce a mixture of five
compounds. This last report identifies 6 as the major dimer.7
Since no data have been reported on the stability of the parent
hydrocarbon as a pure compound, we placed neat samples of
[3]dendralene in sealed glass ampules at 25 °C and its disap-
pearance was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Under these
conditions, [3]dendralene has a half-life of ca. 10 h and undergoes
a relatively clean dimerization to form Trahanovsky’s [4þ2]
adduct 6in 80% isolated yield after 4 weeks at room temperature
(Scheme 3).
SCHEME 2. The New Synthesis of [3]Dendralene
SCHEME 3. The Dimerization of [3]Dendralene
This approach is conceptually similar to our earlier, one-
step cross-coupling protocols in that it involves the union
of two and four carbon fragments, namely 2 and 3. The
alcohol 4, prepared according to the protocol described by
Nunomoto,17 and known18 bromide 5, can be stored over
extended periods without significant decomposition. The
triene-forming elimination step (5 f 1) is carried out by slow
addition of DBU to a solution of the bromide in DMSO held
at room temperature under a modest vacuum; the triene
distills as it is formed and is collected in a cold trap (see the
Experimental Section for details). We have prepared up to
5-g batches of the hydrocarbon of high (>95%) purity in this
manner. Due to the relatively unstable nature of the hydro-
carbon when stored neat (vide infra), we prescribe the
synthesis and storage of the bromide precursor 5 on large
scale and the conversion of this compound into 1 as required.
Nevertheless, when stored in ca. 1 M solutions in common
organic solvents, 1 was found to undergo only slight (<10%)
decomposition over a one-month period in a -20 °C freezer.
Contrasting reports on the stability of 1 have been re-
ported in the literature. Some have suggested that the
hydrocarbon is too prone to polymerization for it to be
synthetically useful19 and another notes that the compound
In principle, four distinct isomeric adducts may be formed,
6-9 (Scheme 4), which arise from permutations of the two
aspects of regioselectivity, specifically site selectivity and
orientational selectivity. Thus, either the inner (I) or outer
(O) alkene site of 1 can function as the dienophile, and the
dienophile and diene substituents can orient in either a
“para” (P) or “meta” (M) sense in the product. The reason
why 6 is the favored adduct may be nicely understood in
terms of a straightforward qualitative mechanistic analysis
advanced by Dewar et al.,20 which is remarkably successful
in predicting substituent effects on the regioselectivity of
Diels-Alder reactions. In this analysis, the Diels-Alder
transition state (TS) involving unsymmetrically substituted
diene and dienophile components is highly asynchronous
and has strong biradicaloid character. Consequently, it is
permissible, for qualitative purposes, to approximate the
biradicaloid TSs with the biradicals themselves, in which
case, the most favored TS is predicted to be that which
corresponds to the most stable biradical. Application of
the Dewar analysis to the [3]dendralene dimerization leads
to a comparison of the relative delocalization energies in the
four TS biradical analogues IP-Birad, IM-Birad, OP-Birad,
and OM-Birad (Scheme 4). IP-Birad is predicted to be the
most stable species because it possesses a pair of delocalized
pentadienyl radicals, whereas the others have either one
(IM-Birad and OP-Birad) or two (OM-Birad) less stable
allyl radicals.
(14) Priebe, H.; Hopf, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 286–287.
€
(15) Bader, H.; Hopf, H.; Jager, H. Chem. Ber. 1989, 122, 1193–1198.
(16) Bradford, T. A.; Payne, A. D.; Willis, A. C.; Paddon-Row, M. N.;
Sherburn, M. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4861–4864.
(17) Nunomoto, S.; Kawakami, Y.; Yamashita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 1912–1914.
(18) Archer, D. A.; Bromidge, S. M.; Sammes, P. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1988, 3223–3228.
(19) (a) Wada, E.; Nagasaki, N.; Kanemasa, S.; Tsuge, O. Chem. Lett.
1986, 1491–1494. (b) Hosomi, A.; Masunari, T.; Tominaga, Y.; Yanagi, T.;
Hojo, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6201–6204.
(20) Dewar, M. J. S.; Olivella, S.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 5771–5779.
(21) This term was coined by Tsuge: Tsuge, O.; Wada, E.; Kanemasa, S.
Chem. Lett. 1983, 12, 239–242.
492 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 2, 2010