Ti(III)-Mediated Weakening of C-O Bonds
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 2. Proposed Mechanism for Ti(III)-Mediated Alcohol
Alcohol deoxygenation constitutes a powerful synthetic tool
especially used in complex natural product synthesis.3 Most of
the known synthetic procedures take place via a number of steps,
the Barton-McCombie methodology being the most commonly
used, mainly for secondary alcohols, due to its compatibility
with different functional groups.4 Few procedures involving one-
step deoxygenations have been described,5 which in our opinion
makes necessary further efforts in this subject.
Deoxygenation-Reduction
Table 1. Calculateda ∆Gq and ∆Grxn Values for C-O Bond
Homolytic Cleavage of Different Alcohols
On the other hand, the reductive coupling of carbonyls into
olefins by use of low-valent titanium species (LVT), known as
the McMurry reaction, has been extensively used in organic
synthesis, and both inter- and intramolecular couplings have
been described to proceed with remarkable efficiency.6 This kind
of reaction is usually carried out in two consecutive steps,
namely, reduction of TiCl4 or TiCl3 followed by addition of
the carbonyl compound. In this regard, a number of reducing
agents such as Li, Na, K, Mg, Zn, KC8, Zn(Cu), LiAlH4, and
others were used, in an attempt to overcome the reproducibility
problems usually associated with this reaction. To this end,
different improved protocols have been reported.7 From a
mechanistic point of view, there are three main features to
consider: formation of the LVT species, coupling reaction, and
finally, deoxygenation of the intermediates leading to the olefin.
In the coupling step, the involvement of acyl radical and/or
carbenoid intermediates in the metallopinacolate formation is
accepted, although their structure is claimed to be influenced
by the nature of the carbonyl group, the titanium species, and
the reducing agent.6g In this sense, even more uncertainties exist
about the actual mechanism of the deoxygenation of these
metallopinacolate intermediates, although it has been widely
a Calculated via UM05/Ahlrichs-VDZ.
accepted that species with low valence states of Ti, either Ti(II)
or Ti(0), were required in this reductive process.
(3) (a) Zard, S. Z. Xanthates and Related Derivatives as Radical Precursors.
In Radicals in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 1; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; pp 90-108. (b)
McCombie, W. S. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis, Vol. 8; Trost,
B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1991; pp
811-833.
Results and Discussion
A. Deoxygenation-Reduction of Alcohols. i. Mechanistic
Proposal and DFT Calculations. The mechanistic proposal for
deoxygenation-reduction of alcohols is depicted in Scheme 2.
Thus, the C-centered radical III, originating from homolysis
of the corresponding C-O bond, could evolve to the corre-
sponding hydrocarbon after being trapped by another molecule
of Cp2TiCl, generating alkyltitanium V, which would then be
protonated easily to afford the alkane. In this regard, the direct
reduction of the radical III by species such as I, IV, or the
solvent should not be ruled out.
To verify this hypothesis, density functional theory (DFT;
UM05/Ahlrichs-VDZ)8 calculations were carried out. Thus, the
energy barriers (∆Grxn and ∆Gq) for homolytic cleavage of the
C-O bond in the alcohol complex I were calculated for different
type of alcohols (Table 1 and Figure 1).
(4) (a) Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 672–685. (b) Barton,
D. H. R.; Jang, D. O.; Jaszberenyi, J. C.; Joseph, C. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 6838–6842. (c) Barton, D. H. R.; Jang, D. O.; Jaszberenyi,
J. C.; Joseph, C. Synlett 1991, 435–438. (d) Barton, D. H. R.;
Motherwell, W. B.; Stange, A. Synthesis 1981, 743–745.
(5) (a) Corey, E. J.; Achiwa, K. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 3667–3668. (b)
McMurry, J. E.; Silvestri, M. G.; Fleming, M. P.; Hoz, T.; Grayston,
M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3249–3254. (c) Ledon, H.; Tkatchenko,
I.; Young, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 173–176. (d) Sato, F.;
Tomuro, Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Oikawa, T.; Sato, M. Chem. Lett. 1980,
103–106. (e) Lee, J. T.; Alper, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4101–
4104. (f) Crevier, T. J.; Mayer, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
8485–8491. (g) Zhang, L.; Koreeda, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
13190–13191. (h) Spiegel, D. A.; Wiberg, K. B.; Schacherer, L. N.;
Medeiros, M. R.; Wood, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12513–
12515.
(6) (a) McMurry, J. E. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1513–1524. (b) Robert-
sonG. M. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Pattenden, G., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1991; Vol.
3, p 563. (c) DushinR. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry
II; Hegedus, L. S., Ed., Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1995; Vol. 3, p 1071.
(d) Lectka, T. In ActiVe Metals: Preparation, Characterization,
Applications; Fu¨rstner, A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
1995; p 85. (e) Fu¨rstner, A.; Bogdanovic, B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2442–2449. (f) Wirth, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 61–63. (g) Ephritikhine, M. Chem. Commun.
1998, 2549–2554.
Although the calculated values were endothermic for all
compounds studied (1-6), the allylic and benzylic alcohols
showed, as expected, lower activation and reaction energies
(8) (a) Frisch, M. J. Gaussian 03, ReVision E.01; Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford, CT, 2004. For complete reference, see Supporting
Information. (b) Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N. E.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Chem.
Phys. 2005, 123, 161103. (c) Schaefer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R.
J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571–2577. (d) Feller, D. J. Comput. Chem.
1996, 17, 1571–1586. (e) Schuchardt, K. L.; Didier, B. T.; Elsethagen,
T.; Sun, L.; Gurumoorthi, V.; Chase, J.; Li, J.; Windus, T. L. J. Chem.
Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1045–1052.
(7) (a) McMurry, J. E.; Letcka, T.; Rico, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
3748–3749. (b) Fu¨rtsner, A.; Hupperts, A.; Ptock, A.; Janssen, E. J.
Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5215–5229.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 1, 2010 255