pubs.acs.org/joc
thermal stability,3,4 electron affinity,5 and interesting non-
Facile Synthesis of 2,6-Disubstituted
Benzobisthiazoles: Functional Monomers for the
Design of Organic Semiconductors
linear optical properties.2,6,7 Typical synthesis of benzo-
bisthiazoles requires strong acids or oxidants8 and high
temperatures.9 These harsh reaction conditions restrict the
types of substituents that can be incorporated onto these
moieties, hindering the exploration of materials containing
benzobisthiazoles.
Jared F. Mike, Jeremy J. Inteman, Arkady Ellern, and
Malika Jeffries-EL*
Recently we reported the synthesis of 2,6-disubstituted
benzobisoxazoles using substituted orthoesters and rare
earth metal triflates as catalysts.10 These reaction conditions
facilitated the synthesis of novel benzobisoxazoles bearing a
variety of substituents cleanly and in high yield. Inspired by
these promising results, we set out to develop a mild, low-
temperature method for the synthesis of the analogous 2,6-
disubstituted benzobisthiazoles. Although benzo[1,2-d;4,
5-d0]bisoxazole (trans-BBO) and trans-BBZT are structurally
similar, the sulfur atom is less electronegative than the
oxygen atom, and has similar electronegativity to the carbon
atom. Thus the electron density is more equally shared
between sulfur and carbon in trans-BBZT than between
oxygen and carbon in trans-BBO and the π-orbitals will be
more delocalized. Additionally the empty d orbitals of the
sulfur atom can contribute to the molecular π-orbitals
decreasing the energy of the π-π* transition.7,11 These
changes can be beneficial for the development of new organic
semiconducting materials. Herein, we report the successful
synthesis of several new benzobisthiazoles. We also demon-
strate that functionality can be increased by a simple reaction
following ring formation.
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University,
1605 Gilman Hall, Ames, Iowa 50010
Received November 7, 2009
The synthesis of several synthetically useful 2,6-disubsti-
tuted benzobisthiazoles is described. The method is based
on the Lewis acid-catalyzed ring-closing reaction between
substituted orthoesters and diamino benzene dithiol. The
resulting benzobisthiazoles are obtained cleanly and in
good yields. These materials are of interest for the devel-
opment of new organic semiconductors.
The general synthetic route for the benzobisazoles is
shown in Scheme 1. Previously, we found that best reaction
conditions for the synthesis of benzobisoxazoles are DMSO
as a solvent, pyridine as a cosolvent, and rare metal triflates
as catalysts.10 The use of the pyridine as a cosolvent is bene-
ficial since it scavenges the hydrochloride salts that coordi-
nate with the diamino diol. Removing the acids prevents the
decomposition of the substituted orthoesters, which is cata-
lyzed by protic acids.10 Using the reaction between 2,5-
diamino-1,4-benzene dithiol (DABDT) (1) and triethy-
lorthoacetate (2b) as a model, we explored these conditions.
Unfortunately, when DABDT was mixed with pyridine in
DMSO, an insoluble green precipitate was formed. This was
most likely caused by the formation of disulfide linkages,
although the insolubility of the material prevented its char-
acterization (entry 1). We then attempted to perform the
The design and synthesis of new organic semiconducting
materials is of current interest due to the important roles
these materials play in the development of plastic electro-
nics.1 Although many π-conjugated materials are known,
most of them are electron rich and exhibit electron-donating
and hole-transporting (p-type) electronic properties. Thus
the synthesis of electron-deficient π-conjugated materials,
which can exhibit electron-accepting and electron-transport-
ing properties (n-type), remains an important problem in the
field.
The electron-deficient benzo[1,2-d;4,5-d0]bisthiazole moi-
ety (trans-BBZT) is a promising building block for the
development of new organic semiconductors because mate-
rials containing benzobisthiazoles exhibit high fluorescence,2
(7) Reinhardt, B. A.; Unroe, M. R.; Evers, R. C. Chem. Mater. 1991, 3,
864.
(8) Pang, H.; Vilela, F.; Skabara, P. J.; McDouall, J. J. W.; Crouch, D. J.;
Anthopoulos, T. D.; Bradley, D. D. C.; de Leeuw, D. M.; Horton, P. N.;
Hursthouse, M. B. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 4438.
(9) (a) Kricheldorf,H.R.;Domschke, A.Polymer1994, 35, 198.(b) Osman,
A. M.; Mohamed, S. A. U.A.R.J. Chem. 1971, 14, 475. (c) Osman, A. M.;
Mohamed, S. A. Indian J. Chem. 1973, 11, 868. (d) Imai, Y.; Itoya, K.;
Kakimoto, M.-A. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000, 201, 2251. (e) Imai, Y.;
Taoka, I.; Uno, K.; Iwakura, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1965, 83, 167.
(10) Mike, J. F.; Makowski, A. J.; Jeffries-EL, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
4915.
(11) Zhao, M.; Samoc, M.; Prasad, P. N.; Reinhardt, B. A.; Unroe, M. R.;
Prazak, M.; Evers, R. C.; Kane, J. J.; Jariwala, C.; Sinsky, M. Chem. Mater.
2002, 2, 670.
(1) (a) Singh, T. B.; Sariciftci, N. S. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2006, 36, 199.
(b) Forrest, S. R. Nature 2004, 428, 911.
(2) Osaheni, J. A.; Jenekhe, S. A. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 4726.
(3) (a) Evers, R. C.; Dotrong, M. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1989, 134,
141. (b) Wolfe, J. F. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering;
John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1988; Vol. 11, p 601.
(4) Wolfe, J. F.; Loo, B. H.; Arnold, F. E. Macromolecules 1981, 14, 915.
(5) (a) Alam, M. M.; Jenekhe, S. A. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 4775.
(b) Babel, A.; Jenekhe, S. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 6129.
(6) (a) Jenekhe, S. A.; Osaheni, J. A.; Meth, J. S.; Vanherzeele, H. Chem.
Mater. 1992, 4, 683. (b) Lee, S.-H.; Otomo, A.; Nakahama, T.; Yamada, T.;
Kamikado, T.; Yokoyama, S.; Mashiko, S. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 2187.
(c) Jenekhe, S. A.; Osaheni, J. A. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1906. (d) Osaheni,
J. A.; Jenekhe, S. A. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 672.
DOI: 10.1021/jo9023864
r
Published on Web 12/18/2009
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 495–497 495
2009 American Chemical Society