excellent diastereoselectivities were obtained even in the
mismatched cases. In sharp contrast, reduction of ketones
with lower steric requeriments on C(1), such as 6e-f, was
much more disappointing. For the sake of comparison,
reductions of 6 with NaBH4 (MeOH, 0 °C) were also
performed, leading to a mixture of diastereomeric amino
alcohols 10 (from 1.5:1 to 3.5:1 anti/syn ratio) in all cases.
According to the mechanism proposed by Corey et al.,14
this remarkable effect of the C(1) substituent, R′, on the
stereoselectivity was unexpected since it is distant from the
oxazaborolidine ring, avoiding any repulsive interaction with
the B-Me group; the stereoselectivity observed for analogous
oxazaborolidine-mediated reductions is usually explained in
this way. However, a closer analysis of molecular models
reveals that an “endo” arrangement, as in 12, may be dis-
favored, since the rigid linear nature of the triple bond puts
the SiR′3 and the R-phenyl group in close proximity; the
i-Bu group and the Boc-amino moiety (shown as a ball in
Figure 1) are then pushed near to the borane-oxazaboroli-
To assess this assumption, a series of ab initio 3-21G
calculations15 have been undertaken. In our preliminary
results for the BH3-6a-(R)-7 complex, the arrangement of
the most stable exo conformation (which would lead to syn-
10a) is ca. 1.85 kcal mol-1 more stable than the endo
conformation of lowest energy (Figure 2, 13a and 12a
Figure 1. Complexes of ketones 6a-c with (R)-7.
dine complex, destabilizing that arrangement. This repulsive
interaction becomes more important when R′ is bulky,
encouraging the pathway that proceeds via “exo” complex
13.
(7) For a review on syntheses of â-amino acids, see: Cole, D. C.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9517. For a discussion of the synthetic approaches
to â-hydroxy γ-amino acids, see: Castejo´n, P.; Moyano, A.; Perica`s, M.
A.; Riera, A. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7063. See also: Pasto´, M.; Moyano,
A.; Perica`s, M. A.; Riera, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 243.
(8) For example, see: Merino, P.; Castillo, E.; Franco, S.; Mercha´n, F.
L.; Tejero, T. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 12301. See also: Jost, S.; Gimbert,
Y.; Greene, A. E.; Fotiadu, F. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6672.
(9) For example, see: Harris, B. C.; Joullie´, M. M. Tetrahedron 1988,
44, 3489. Good results have been also reported with bulky N,N-dibenzyl-
protected compunds, but the deprotection step was troublesome: Reetz,
M. T.; Drewes, M. W.; Matthews, B. R.; Lennick, K. Chem. Commun.
1989, 1474. See also: Hoffman, R. V.; Tao, J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
2292 and references therein.
(10) For a review on the synthesis of diastereomeric amino alcohols,
see: Tramontini, M. Synthesis 1982, 605. See also ref 9.
(11) Bach, J.; Berenguer, R.; Garcia, J.; Loscertales, T.; Vilarrasa, J. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9021. Bach, J.; Garcia, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 6761. Bach, J.; Galobardes, M.; Garcia, J.; Romea, P.; Tey, C.; Urp´ı,
F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6765.
(12) Compound 6c was obtained in only 30% yield.
(13) Cupps, T. L.; Boutin, R. H.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
3972.
(14) For a review on oxazaborolidine-mediated reductions, see: Corey,
E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986. Remote repulsive
interactions with the B-alkyl group in the reduction of R,â-ynones have
been reported: Helal, C. J.; Magriotis, P. A.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 10938.
Figure 2. Ab initio 3-21G geometries for BH3-6a-(R)-7 com-
plexes.
respectively), in agreement with the experimental results.
Having in hand stereochemically enriched amino alcohols
10, we undertook their transformation into acids 8 and 9 (see
Scheme 3). Thus, hydroboration16 of syn-10a (or syn-10b)
with dicyclohexylborane followed by oxidative workup
afforded protected statine (syn-8). In a similar way, anti-8
was obtained from anti-10a or anti-10b.
On the other hand, treatment of amino alcohols 10 with
2,2-dimethoxypropane and a catalytic amount of PPTS
provided a mixture of oxazolidines 14 from which the minor
(15) All ab initio calculations were carried out using the GAUSSIAN-
94 (rev. E.1) series of programs (Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995).
(16) Midland, M. M.; Lee, P. E. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3933.
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 11, 1999
1833