Notes and references
1 J. Christoffers and A. Baro, in Quaternary Stereocenters: Challenges and
Solutions for Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
2 B. M. Trost and C. H. Jiang, Synthesis, 2006, 369.
3 A. Ashimori, T. Matsuura, L. E. Overman and D. J. Poon, J. Org.
Chem., 1993, 58, 6949.
4 A. Huang, J. J. Kodanko and L. E. Overman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126, 14043.
5 S. Adhikari, S. Caille, M. Hanbauer, V. X. Ngo and L. E. Overman,
Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 2795.
6 Y. Hamashima, T. Suzuki, H. Takano, Y. Shimura and M. Sodeoka,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10164.
7 B. M. Trost and Y. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4590.
8 B. M. Trost and M. K. Brennan, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2027.
9 T. H. Black, S. M. Arrivo, J. S. Schumm and J. M. Knobeloch, J. Org.
Chem., 1987, 52, 5425.
10 I. D. Hills and G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3921.
11 S. A. Shaw, P. Aleman, J. Christy, J. W. Kampf, P. Va and E. Vedejs,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 925.
12 R. M. Acheson, J. M. Vernon and R. W. Snaith, J. Chem. Soc., 1964,
3229.
Scheme 3
13 J. M. Muchowski, Can. J. Chem., 1970, 48, 422.
14 A. Walser, J. F. Blount and R. I. Fryer, J. Org. Chem., 1973, 38, 3077.
15 N. Finch and W. I. Taylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1962, 84, 3871.
16 K. V. Lichman, J. Chem. Soc. C, 1971, 2539.
3-chloroindolenine intermediate 9 (X = Br, R = Ph or Me) as a
1.4 : 1 mixture of diastereoisomers. It is in this intermediate that we
assume that the 7-substituent plays a role by severely limiting the
conformational mobility of the 2-methoxymethylpyrrolidine
group. Inspection of molecular models suggests that the con-
formation depicted in Scheme 3 would minimize steric interaction
both with the newly introduced chlorine and the large substituent
at C-7. Protonation at nitrogen followed by auxiliary-controlled
attack of ethanol from the least hindered side would then lead to
intermediate 10, whereupon SN1 loss of chloride with concomitant
migration of the auxiliary across the a-face would give 2-ethoxy-
indolenine 11 in which the stereochemistry of the final product is
already established before hydrolysis to the oxindole 8 upon
chromatography. In accord with our proposal, in the case of the
oxidative rearrangement of 7-bromoindole 7b, we were able to
isolate the ethoxyindolenine 11 (X = Br, R = Ph) and ascertain
that it was an 8 : 1 mixture of diastereoisomers. An alternative
explanation is that the a- and b-chloro epimers of indolenine 9 are
in equilibrium via the N-chloroindole as has been suggested in
simpler systems,22 with the equilibration possibly being assisted by
the presence of a substituent X, and it is the b-chloro compound,
with the chloride anti to the migrating group, that reacts faster.
The applications of this remarkable effect of a remote
substituent in the asymmetric synthesis of a range of 3,3-
disubstituted oxindoles are under investigation.
17 M. Ito, C. W. Clark, M. Mortimore, J. B. Goh and S. F. Martin, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8003.
18 J. R. Davies, P. D. Kane and C. J. Moody, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70,
7305.
19 F. N. Palmer, F. Lach, C. Poriel, A. G. Pepper, M. C. Bagley,
A. M. Z. Slawin and C. J. Moody, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 3805.
20 D. Enders and M. Klatt, Synthesis, 1996, 1403.
21 Full hemisphere of data collected, corrected for Lorentz and polariza-
tion and for absorption, using multiple equivalent reflections.
Refinements on F2 using SHELXTL. Compound 8b (crystallizes with
two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and with 0.5 mol
CHCl3): Rigaku MM007 high brilliance generator, confocal optic,
Saturn 92 detector, colourless needle 0.2 6 0.01 6 0.01 mm,
C21.5H21.5BrCl1.5N2O3, Mr = 488.99, monoclinic, space group P2(1),
˚
a = 9.64370(19), b = 12.4445(12), c = 18.3737(17) A, b = 102.099(3)u, V =
3
˚
˚
2156.1(3) A , Z = 4, 2hmax 136u , CuKa l = 1.54718 A, T = 173(2) K,
rcalcd = 1.506 g cm23, m = 4.520 mm21 (max, min transmission 1.00,
0.3940), 28203 reflections collected, 7217 unique [R(int) = 0.1652], R1 =
0.0858, wR2 = 0.1330 for 4900 observed reflections [(I) . 2s (I)], max.
and min. residual electron density 0.494, 20.481 e A23. Flack parameter
˚
0.01(3). Compound 8i Rigaku MM007 high brilliance generator,
confocal optics, Mercury detector, colourless prism 0.1 6 0.03 6
0.03 mm, C16H19Br1N2O3, Mr = 367.24, orthorhombic, space group
˚
P212121, a = 8.5669(14), b = 12.7503(16), c = 14.900(3) A, V =
3
˚
˚
1627.6(4) A , Z = 4, 2hmax 50.7u , MoKa l = 0.71073 A, T = 93(2) K,
rcalcd = 1.499 g cm23, m = 2.539 mm21 (max., min. transmission 1.00,
0.7533), 10 463 reflections collected, 2932 unique [R(int) = 0.0274], R1 =
0.0206, wR2 = 0.0468 for 2707 observed reflections [(I) . 2s(I)], max.
and min. residual electron density 0.589, 20.294 e A23. Flack parameter
˚
20.005(7). CCDC 609781–609784. For crystallographic data in CIF or
other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/b613716d.
22 M. De Rosa and J. L. T. Alonso, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 2639.
This work was supported by the EPSRC.
288 | Chem. Commun., 2007, 286–288
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007