Live Cell Imaging with Solvatochromic Coumarins
A R T I C L E S
recognition signal comes from a solvatochromic prosthetic group
able to sense the polarity change associated with binding.
Reasonably, it should be located at a site close enough to the
binding region of the biosensor (where changes in polarity
necessarily occur) but not too close, so that it does not hamper
the recognition and binding process.
In past years, solvatochromic dyes have been extensively
employed in selective staining of many subcellular domains.
Notably, solvatochromic FM dyes are widely employed as
membrane-staining agents, since they localize preferentially on
cell membrane, where their fluorescence is enhanced.20 How-
ever, the development of solvatochromic dyes as polarity probes
to investigate protein binding, membrane rearrangement, and
other biological processes has not evolved to its full potential.
Fluorescent coumarins are attractive fluorophores, as they are
characterized by high quantum yields (up to 0.90),21 high
extinction coefficients (10,000-40,000),22,23 large Stokes shifts
(up to 160 nm),24 and can be engineered to respond to their
environment polarity (solvatochromic probes).25-27 These prop-
erties promoted their use as dyes,28,21,29 sensors for metal
cations,30-34 and dopants for OLEDs.35,36 The well-known
commercial fluorophores Alexa 350 and Alexa 430 are based
on a coumarin core.37 Recently, coumarins were thoroughly
investigated in view of synthesizing new probes for biological
applications, in particular for the imaging of living cells.38-48
In spite of their relevance as biosensors, however, no studies
describing solvatochromic coumarins tailored to probe the
different polarity properties of biological environments in
cultured cells have been yet reported.
A powerful method to confer solvatochromic properties to
aromatic fluorophores involves the concomitant functionalization
with electron-donor (D) and electron-acceptor (A) groups. This
effect is related to the large dipole moment present in such
structures and its significant variations between the ground and
the excited state. In such a case, the excited state is often referred
to as intramolecular charge transfer (ICT). The change in
solvation energy between polar and apolar environments ac-
counts for the shift in intensity and/or wavelength in their
absorption and fluorescence spectra.49 Alternatively, the ICT
state can evolve along the energy landscape to excited states of
different nature following a process that is strongly influenced
by the surrounding polarity.
The aromatic core of coumarin is particularly suitable for
the introduction of D and A groups, as the most common
synthetic pathway involves the use of hydroxy aldehydes and
2-aryl substituted acetates. Both of these aromatic subunits can
be easily functionalized with A or D groups. This work will
present the synthesis and spectroscopic analysis of new solva-
tochromic coumarins for intracellular use bearing one A group
in position 3, and D groups in positions 5, 6, 7 and/or 8.
Concerning position 3, our choice fell on a benzothiazene
group, owing to its electron-withdrawing aromatic system
capable also to extend electron conjugation. Amino substituents
are excellent D groups, and would represent a good choice for
the electron-rich part of the fluorophore. These substituents,
however, bring about significant drawbacks. Indeed, aromatic
amino groups are quite reactive and may undergo chemical
processes that hamper their further functionalization and/or
strongly affect the solvatochromic outcome (e.g., protonation
of the amino group strongly decreases its electron-donating
capability). Our selection for the positions 5-8 fell on oxygen-
based D groups, which essentially overcome these limitations
while retaining most of the electron-donating properties of amino
substituents. Additionally, we explored the possibility to
incorporate a further aromatic ring to increase electronic
conjugation. In the following, we shall show that these new
fluorophores display high sensitivity to the environmental
polarity combined with good-to-excellent brightness and are
indeed suitable for intracellular use.
(18) Loving, G.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13630–13638.
(19) Volodymyr, S. V.; Klymchenko, A. S.; de Rocquigny, H.; Me´ly, Y.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, e25.
(20) Bolte, S.; Talbot, C.; Boutte, Y.; Catrice, O.; Read, N. D.; Satiat-
Jeunemaitre, B. J. Microsc. 2004, 214, 159–173.
(21) Turki, H.; Abid, S.; Fery-Forgues, S.; El Gharbi, R. Dyes Pigm. 2007,
73, 311–316.
(22) Christie, R. M.; Lui, C.-H. Dyes Pigm. 2000, 47, 79–89.
(23) Wolfbeis, O. S.; Koller, E.; Hochmuth, P. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985,
58, 731–734.
(24) Elangovan, A.; Lin, J.-H.; Yang, S.-W.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Ho, T.-I. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 8086–8092.
(25) Hirano, T.; Hiromoto, K.; Kagechika, H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1315–
1318.
(26) Turki, H.; Abid, S.; El Gharbi, R.; Fery-Forgues, S. C. R. Chimie
2006, 9, 1252–1259.
(27) Uchiyama, S.; Takehira, K.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S.; Ohwada, T.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5869–5872.
(28) Christie, R. M.; Morgan, K. M.; Islam, M. S. Dyes Pigm. 2008, 76,
741–747.
(29) Luo, X.; Naiyun, X.; Cheng, L.; Huang, D. Dyes Pigm. 2001, 51,
153–159.
2. Results
(30) Peng, M.-S.; Cai, J. Dyes Pigm. 2008, 79, 270–272.
(31) Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Cui, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4308–4311.
(32) Lin, W.; Yuan, L.; Feng, J.; Cao, X. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
2689–2692.
2.1. Computational Screening of Coumarin Compounds.
Preliminarily to any experimental step, a computational analysis
by density functional theory (DFT/B3LYP) was performed to
identify interesting substitution donor-(coumarin core)-acceptor
(33) Lim, N. C.; Schuster, J. V.; Porto, M. C.; Tanudra, M. A.; Yao, L.;
Freake, H. C.; Bruckner, C. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2018–2030.
(34) Ma, Y.; Luo, W.; Quinn, P. J.; Liu, Z.; Hider, R. C. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 6349–6362.
(35) Lee, M.-T.; Yen, C.-K.; Yang, W.-P.; Chen, H.-H.; Liao, C.-H.; Tsai,
C.-H.; Chen, C. H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1241–1244.
(36) Swanson, S. A.; Wallraff, G. M.; Chen, J. P.; Zhang, W.; Bozano,
L. D.; Carter, K. R.; Salem, J. R.; Villa, R.; Campbell, S. Chem. Mater.
2003, 15, 2305–2312.
(42) Kim, H. M.; Fang, X. Z.; Yang, P. R.; Yi, J.-S.; Ko, Y. G.; Piao,
M. J.; Chung, Y. D.; Park, Y. W.; Jeon, S.-J.; Cho, B. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 2791–2795.
(43) Dillingham, M. S.; Tibbles, K. L.; Hunter, J. L.; Bell, J. C.;
Kowalczykowski, S. C.; Webb, M. R. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 3330–
3339.
(37) Panchuk-Voloshina, N.; Haugland, R. P.; Bishop-Stewart, J.; Bhalgat,
M. K.; Millard, P. J.; Mao, F.; Leung, W.-L.; Haugland, R. P.
J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1999, 47, 1179–1188.
(44) Webb, M. R.; Corrie, J. E. T. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1562–1569.
(45) Katritzky, A. R.; Cusido, J.; Narindoshvili, T. Bioconjugate Chem.
2008, 19, 1471–1475.
(46) Komatsu, K.; Urano, Y.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 13447–13454.
(47) Komatsu, H.; Miki, T.; Citterio, D.; Kubota, T.; Shindo, Y.; Kitamura,
Y.; Oka, K.; Suzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10798–10799.
(48) Webb, W. R.; Corrie, J. E. T. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1562–1569.
(49) Suppan, P.; Ghoneim, N. SolVatochromism; The Royal Society of
Chemistry, Cambridge, U.K., 1997; ISBN 0-85404-419-1.
(38) Brun, M.-P.; Bischoff, L.; Garbay, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 3432–3436.
(39) Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Dakin, K.; Xu, K.; Martinez, M. L.; Li, W.-H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4653–4663.
(40) Eckardt, T.; Hagen, V.; Schade, B.; Schmidt, R.; Schweitzer, C.;
Bendig, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 703–710.
(41) Coleman, R. S.; Berg, M. A.; Murphy, C. J. Tetrahedron 2007, 63,
3450–3456.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 4, 2010 1277