Basilio et al.
JOCArticle
SCHEME 1
SCHEME 2
showing a 105 times acceleration that is attributed to bound-
substrate destabilization. CB7 and CB8 have been employed to
catalyze different types of photocycloaddition reactions.14 Very
recently Nau15 and co-workers have shown that the supramo-
lecular complexation by CB7 affords a highly efficient inhibi-
tion on the activity of proteases, which can be analyzed by a
host-substrate complexation model.
A number of host-guest studies have been carried out by
using the cooperative effect of simultaneous addition of
cyclodextrins and cucurbiturils. Cucurbiturils mainly bind
cationic guests instead of cyclodextrins distinguishing be-
tween guests based on hydrophobic size rather than charge.
Formation of ternary complexes has been reported.16 The
pH-responsive movement of the cucurbituril units in the
host-guest complexes suggests its application as a basis for
stimuli-responsive reconfigurable systems.17
The main objective of the present work is to show the
differences and similarities between the CB7 and β-CD
cavities by using not only the equilibrium constant values
for the formation of the host guest complexes, but also the
specific interactions that can occur inside the cavities. To this
end we have studied two kinds of solvolytic reactions in the
presence of CB7 and β-CD because these reactions have
extreme sensibility to the physical properties of the reaction
medium. We have studied the solvolysis of 1-bromoadaman-
tane, whose solvolytic reaction takes place via an SN1 reac-
tion mechanism without the possibility of nucleophilic
solvent assistance.18 Moreover we have studied the solvolysis
of substituted benzoyl chlorides (Scheme 2). Because these
reactions in question exhibit no acid catalysis,19 any changes
in reactivity must be directly related to changes in the
physical properties of the environment of the host cavity.
This point is of special relevance because it is well-known
that complexation by cucurbiturils and cyclodextrins
can shift the pKa value of included guests.20 Cucurbituril
Interest in the cucurbit[n]uril family has increased dramati-
cally in the new millennium following the preparation of four
new cucurbit[n]uril homologues (CB5, CB7, CB8, and
CB10 CB5) by the research groups of Kim and Day.2c,7
3
Scheme 1 compares the structures of β-CD (a) and CB7
(b). Although the sizes and shapes of these two hosts are
similar, their structural differences lead to distinct binding
differences. CB7 has a symmetric geometry with two iden-
tical openings that are lined with electronegative carbonyl
groups. However, β-CD has a less symmetric geometry with
one opening to the interior lined with primary hydroxyl
groups and the other lined with secondary hydroxyls. Several
different modes of intermolecular interactions promote the
binding of guest by cucurbiturils. First, as for cyclodextrins,
a hydrophobic effect applies, i.e., a composite effect derived
from an interplay between the release of “high-energy water”
upon complexation of nonpolar organic residues and con-
comitant differential dispersion interactions inside the cavity
and in bulk water.8 Second, ion-dipole interactions of metal
cation4,9 or organic ammonium ions10 with either ureido
carbonyl rim may come into play, while hydrogen-bonding
interactions prevail less frequently.11 As a peculiarity, the
complexation of metal cations at the ureido rims can lead
to ternary supramolecular complexes composed of host,
included guest, and associated metal ion. In fact, it has been
suggested that the cations function as “lids” to seal the portal
and promote binding.12
The confinement imposed by supramolecular inclusion and
the associated variations in substrate reactivity are especially
important in supramolecular catalysis. Mock13 and co-workers
have studied the influence of CB6 on cycloaddition reactions
(7) (a) Day, A. I.; Arnold, A. P.; Blanch, R. J.; Snushall, B. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 8094–8100. (b) Day, A. I.; Blanch, R. J.; Arnold, A. P.; Lorenzo, S.;
Lewis, G. R.; Dance, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 275–277.
(8) (a) Schmidtchen, F. P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2002, 8, 3522–3529.
(b) Buschmann, H.-J.; Jansen, K.; Schollmeyer, E. Thermochim. Acta 1998,
317, 95–98.
(15) Henning, A.; Ghale, G.; Nau, W. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 1614–
1616.
(9) Buschmann, H.-J.; Cleve, E.; Schollmeyer, E. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1992,
193, 93–97.
(10) (a) Mock, W. L.; Shih, N. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2697–
2699. (b) Mock, W. L.; Shih, N. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4706–4710.
(11) Buschmann, H.-J.; Jansen, K.; Schollmeyer, E. Thermochim. Acta
2000, 346, 33–36.
(12) (a) Jeon, Y. M.; Kim, J.; Whang, D.; Kim, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 9790–9791. (b) Whang, D.; Heo, J.; Park, J. H.; Kim, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 78–80.
(13) (a) Mock, W. L.; Irra, T. A.; Wepsiec, J. P.; Adhya, M. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 5302–5308. (b) Mock, W. L.; Irra, T. A.; Wepsiec, J. P.; Manimaran,
T. L. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3619–3620.
(14) (a) Jon, S. Y.; Ko, Y. H.; Park, S. H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, K. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 1938–1939. (b) Maddipatla, M. V. S. N.; Kaanumalle, L. S.;
Natarajan, A.; Pattabiraman, M.; Ramamurthy, V. Langmuir 2007, 23,
7545–7554. (c) Pattabiraman, M.; Natarajan, A.; Kaanumalle, L. S.;
Ramamurthy, V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 529–532. (d) Wang, R.; Yuan, L.;
Macartney, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1237–1239.
(16) (a) Rekharsky, M. V.; Yamamura, H.; Kawai, M.; Osaka, I.;
Arakawa, R.; Sato, A.; Ko, Y. H.; Selvapalam, N.; Kim, K.; Inoue, Y.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 815–818. (b) Zou, D.; Andersson, S.; Zhang, R.; Sun, S.;
Akermark, B.; Sun, L. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4734–4736.
(17) (a) Chakrabarti, S.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Lin, S.; Isaacs, L. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 2349–2352. (b) Ooya, T.; Inoue, D.; Choi, H. S.; Kobayashi, Y.;
Loethen, S.; Thompson, D. H.; Ko, Y. H.; Kim, K.; Yui, N. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3159–3162.
(18) (a) Raber, D. J.; Bingham, R. C.; Harris, J. M.; Fry, J. L.; Schleyer,
P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5977–5981. (b) Bentley, T. W.; Carter,
G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5741–5747.
(19) Motie, R. E.; Satchell, D. P. N.; Wassef, W. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1993, 1087–1090.
(20) (a) Bakirci, H.; Koner, A. L.; Schwarzlose, T.; Nau, W. M. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4799–4807. (b) Saleh, N.; Koner, A. L.; Nau, W. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5398–5401. (c) Wang, R.; Macartney, D. H. Org.
€
Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1955–1960. (d) Klock, C.; Dsouza, R. N.; Nau, W. N.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2595–2598.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 3, 2010 849