alternative strategy is the use of trifluoromethylated com-
pounds as building blocks, and CF3 sources are mainly from
trifluoromethyl ketones and trifluoropyruvates.4 We envis-
aged that ꢀ-trifluoromethyl acrylates would be an excellent
candidate as an acceptor in the Friedel-Crafts reaction,5
which provides a potential chiral CF3 group and can be
transformed into ꢀ-trifluoromethylated carboxylic acids.
Table 1. Optimization of the Asymmetric FC Reactiona
Asymmetric Friedel-Crafts (FC) reactions have witnessed
rapid development in recent years.6 Indoles have usually
served as nucleophiles in FC reactions, and the use of
pyrroles, especially unprotected pyrroles, in FC reactions is
rarely reported,7 despite their usefulness in pharmaceuticals.8
In 2001, MacMillan and co-workers pioneered the work of
catalytic asymmetric FC alkylation with pyrroles.9a Recently,
the Sibi group described the first protocol of highly enan-
tioselective Friedel-Crafts alkylations/enolate protonation
using various pyrrole nucleophiles.9b As part of a program
that focuses on the construction of chiral trifluoromethylated
products,10 we herein report the first chiral Lewis acid
catalyzed enantioselective FC reactions of protected and
unprotected pyrroles with ꢀ-CF3 acrylates.
Chiral Lewis acids prepared from Ph-dbfox (Ph-dbfox )
(R,R)-4,6-dibenzofurandiyl-2,2-bis(4-phenyloxazoline)) and
different metal salts were screened in CH2Cl2 at rt for the
asymmetric FC reaction of 1 with 2a (entries 1-6). Lewis
acids such as Cu(OTf)2, Cu(NTf2)2, and Zn(OAc)2 in
combination with ligand Ph-dbfox led to disappointing results
(Table 1, entries 1-3). Moderate enantioselectivity was
entry Lewis acid solvent temp (°C) t (h) yield (%)b ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cu(OTf)2 CH2Cl2
Cu(NTf2)2 CH2Cl2
Zn(OAc)2 CH2Cl2
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
24
24
24
24
4
2
6
6
trace
trace
trace
40
86
96
ND
ND
ND
38
75
75
Zn(OTf)2
CH2Cl2
Zn(ClO4)2 CH2Cl2
Zn(NTf2)2 CH2Cl2
Zn(NTf2)2 toluene
Zn(NTf2)2 Et2O
93
91
60
72
9
10
11
Zn(NTf2)2 CHCl3
Zn(NTf2)2 CH2Cl2
Zn(NTf2)2 CH2Cl2
20
2
90
98
96
96
70
89
96
98
-40
-60
-75
12
24
24
12d Zn(NTf2)2 CH2Cl2
a Unless noted, all reactions performed at 0.10 M in substrate 1 and
0.50 M in substrate 2a, with 10 mol % catalyst loading in 0.5 mL of solvent.
b Isolated yields. c Determined by chiral HPLC; ND ) not determined.
d Reaction performed at 0.20 M in substrate 1, with 0.25 mL of solvent
and 20 mol % catalyst used.
obtained in the presence of Zn(OTf)2 (entry 4). Gratifyingly,
Zn(NTf2)2/Ph-dbfox gave the adduct 3a in good ee and
excellent yield (entry 6). Notably, the use of Zn(ClO4)2/Ph-
dbfox as a chiral Lewis acid provided 3a in comparable
enantioselectivity, but less efficiently than Zn(NTf2)2 (entry
5). Therefore, Zn(NTf2)2/Ph-dbfox was chosen as a catalyst
system in the following reactions. A subsequent solvent
survey revealed that CH2Cl2 was the solvent of choice with
regards to both enantioselectivity and yield. In addition, the
effects of reaction temperature were also evaluated. It was
demonstrated that ee’s obtained and the reaction time
required were dependent on the reaction temperature. Lower-
ing the reaction temperature resulted in increased enantio-
selectivity from 75% to 89% ee (entry 6 vs 10) with 98%
yield. The enantioselectivity was further increased at -60
°C, generating 3a in up to 96% ee with 96% yield (entry
11). The best ee (98%) was observed at -75 °C under higher
catalyst loading with a higher concentration (entry 12).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, a variety of
pyrroles were screened using 1 as the nucleophile acceptor.
The results are presented in Table 2. The reaction of
unprotected pyrrole 2b gave the product 3b in 97% yield
with 99% ee (entry 1). The absolute configuration of 3b was
assigned as S.11 It should be noted that high enantioselec-
tivities were observed independent of the substitutions on
the pyrrole nitrogen as well as the 2-position (92-97% ee,
entries 2-7). In addition, pyrroles containing electron-
withdrawing and sterically bulky groups such as Bn and Ph
displayed inferior reactivity and selectivity (<90% ee, entries
(3) (a) Shibata, N.; Mizuta, S.; Kawai, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008,
19, 2633–2644. (b) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, PR1–
PR43.
(4) Selected examples of the catalytic asymmetric FC reaction with
simple trifluoromethyl ketones: (a) Nie, J.; Zhang, G.-W.; Wang, L.; Fu,
A.-P.; Zheng, Y,; Ma, J.-A. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2356–2358. (b) Tur,
F.; Saa´, J. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5079–5082. With trifluoropyruvates: (c)
Nakamura, S.; Hyodo, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 1443–1448. (d) Zhao, J.-L.; Liu, L.; Sui, Y.; Liu, Y.-L.;
Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6127–6130. (e) To¨ro¨k, B.; Abid,
M.; London, G.; Esquibel, J.; To¨ro¨k, M.; Mhadgut, S. C.; Yan, P.; Prakash,
G. K. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3086–3089.
(5) (a) Sani, M.; Candiani, G.; Pecker, F.; Malpezzia, L.; Zanda, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2393–2396. (b) Tamura, K.; Yamazaki, T.;
Kitazume, T.; Kubota, T. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 918–930. (c) Wada,
H. Japan Patent JP2005247788A, 2005.
(6) For reviews on asymmetric FC reaction, see: (a) Catalytic Asymmetric
Friedel-Crafts Alkylations; Bandini, M., Umani-Ronchi, A., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2009; pp 1-301. (b) Poulsen, T. B.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2903–2915.
(7) Selected examples of asymmetric FC reaction of unprotected pyrrole:
(a) Trost, B. M.; Müller, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2438–2439. (b)
Blay, G.; Ferna´ndez, I.; Pedro, J. R.; Vila, C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2601–
2604. (c) Evans, D. A.; Fandrick, K. R.; Song, H. J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Xu,
R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10029–10041. (d) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide,
M.; Kardak, B. G.; Garcia, J. M.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
4154–4155. (e) Zhuang, W.; Gathergood, N.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1009–1013.
(8) (a) Trofimo, N. A.; Nedolya, N. A. In ComprehensiVe Heterocyclic
Chemistry III; Katritzky, A. R., Ramsden, C. A., Scriven, E. F. V.; Taylor,
R. J. K., Eds.; Elsevier Ltd.: Oxford, 2008; Vol. 3, pp 45-268. (b) Lipshutz,
B. H. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 795–819.
(9) (a) Paras, N. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 4370–4371. (b) Sibi, M. P.; Coulomb, J.; Stanley, L. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9913–9915.
(10) (a) Noritake, S.; Shibata, N.; Nomura, Y.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Matsnev,
A.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Cahard, D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3599–
3604. (b) Kawai, H.; Kusuda, A.; Nakamura, S.; Shiro, M.; Shibata, N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6324–6327. (c) Ogawa, S.; Shibata, N.;
Inagaki, J.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Shiro, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 8666–8669.
(11) The absolute configuration of 3b was assigned as S after deriva-
tization to 4 and comparison of optical rotation to a sample of (R)-4
synthesized differently. See Supporting Information for details.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 5, 2010
1137