Table 2 Ortho-selective aromatic C–H borylation of 1 with 2a
Entry
Productb
Yield (%)c
Entry
Productb
Yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
R = Me
R = Et
R = i-Pr
R = t-Bu
95
92
89
83
9
Y = Me2N
Y = Me
Y = Br
99
98
64
94
10
11
12
Y = F3C
5
6
7
8
Y = Me2N
Y = Me
Y = Br
97
92
60
98
13
14
15
16
Y = Me2N
Y = Me
Y = Br
93
99
57d
98
Y = F3C
Y = F3C
a
All reactions were carried out at 80 1C for 16 h by using 1 (5.0 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 (0.015 mmol), tris[3,5-bis(trifluoro-
methyl)phenyl]phosphine (0.06 mmol), and octane (6 ml). Isomeric purities over 98% were determined by 1H NMR. GC yields based on 2.
d
b
c
The reaction was conducted in a mixture of octane and mesitylene (1 : 1).
available, we decided to investigate them as ligands of iridium.
Although catalysts having electron-rich phosphines such as
tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine exhibited low activity and
regioselectivity (Entry 6), those having electron-poor phosphines
such as tris(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine displayed high
ortho-selectivity and moderate catalytic activity (Entry 7).
Complexes bearing more electron-poor tris(pentafluorophenyl)-
phosphine improved the catalytic activity while maintaining
high regioselectivity (Entry 8). Finally, high yield (95%) and
highest ortho-selectivity (98%) were achieved when tris-
[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphine (P(3,5-2F3C–C6H3)3)
was used as a ligand of iridium (Entry 9).
In summary, ortho-borylated products were obtained
with excellent regioselectivities by the reaction of benzoate
esters with bis(pinacolato)diboron in the presence of a
catalytic amount of iridium complexes generated from
[Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 and commercial tris[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-
phenyl]phosphine in octane at 80 1C. Further investigations to
survey the scope and limitations of this C–H borylation,
including C–H borylation of other aromatic carbonyl
compounds such as ketones and amides, as well as to elucidate
the reaction mechanisms are in progress.
This work was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 17065001,
‘‘Advanced Molecular Transformations of Carbon Resources’’)
from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan.
The choice of iridium precursor was crucial for the
borylation. Although the combination of [IrCl(COD)]2 and
P(3,5-2F3C–C6H3)3 gave borylated products in good yield
(62%), ortho-selectivity was low (55%). No borylated product
was obtained when the combination of [Ir(COD)2]BF4 and the
phosphine was used. The choice of inert solvent was
also important for efficient borylation. The reactions using
1/2[Ir(OMe)(COD)]2–2P(3,5-2F3C–C6H3)3 were faster in
non-polar solvents such as octane than in more polar and
coordinating solvents. The order of reactivity in different
solvents was octane (95%) > mesitylene (3%) > diglyme
(0%) = DMF (0%).
Notes and references
1 (a) J. A. Labinger and J. E. Bercaw, Nature, 2002, 417, 507;
(b) F. Kakiuchi and N. Chatani, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345,
1077; (c) Handbook of C–H Transformations, ed. G. Dyker,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005; K. Godula and D. Sames, Science,
2006, 312, 67; (d) A. L. Dick and S. Stanford, Tetrahedron, 2006,
62, 2439; (e) I. V. Seregin and V. Gevorgyan, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2007, 36, 1173; (f) R. G. Bergman, Nature, 2007, 446, 391.
2 (a) M. Vaultier and B. Carboni, in Comprehensive Organometallic
Chemistry II, ed. E. W. Abel, F. G. A. Stone and G. Wilkinson,
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1995, vol. 11, p. 191; (b) K. Ishihara and
H. Yamamoto, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 527; (c) S. Shinkai,
M. Ikeda, A. Sugasaki and M. Takeuchi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001,
34, 494; (d) C. D. Entwistle and T. B. Marder, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2002, 41, 2927; (e) A. H. Soloway, W. Tjarks, B. A. Barnum,
F.-G. Rong, R. F. Barth, I. M. Codogni and J. G. Wilson, Chem.
Rev., 1998, 98, 1515; (f) W. Yang, X. Gao and B. Wang, Med. Res.
Rev., 2003, 23, 346; (g) Boronic Acids, ed. D. G. Hall, Wiley,
Weinheim, 2005.
3 (a) C. N. Iverson and M. R. Smith, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999,
121, 7696; (b) J.-Y. Cho, C. N. Iverson and M. R. Smith, III,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12868; (c) M. K. Tse, J.-Y. Cho and
M. R. Smith, III, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 2831; (d) J.-Y. Cho,
M. K. Tse, D. Holmes, R. E. Maleczka, Jr and M. R. Smith, III,
Science, 2002, 295, 305; (e) R. E. Meleczka, Jr, F. Shi, D. Holmes
and M. R. Smith, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 7792;
(f) G. A. Chotana, M. A. Rak and M. R. Smith, III, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 10539; (g) S. Paul, G. A. Chotana, D. Holmes,
R. C. Reichle, R. E. Maleczka, Jr and M. R. Smith, III, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15552; (h) G. A. Chotana, V. A. Kallepalli,
R. E. Maleczka, Jr and M. R. Smith, III, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64,
6103.
Representative results of ortho-C–H borylation of benzoate
esters 1 with B2pin22 catalyzed by the combination of
1/2[Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 and 2P(3,5-2F3C–C6H3)3 in octane at
80 1C for 16 h are shown in Table 2. Not only methyl but
also ethyl, isopropyl and tert-butyl benzoates were all viable
substrates for producing the corresponding ortho-borylated
products in high yields with excellent regioselectivities,
whilst their reactivity slightly decreased in the above order
(Entries 1–4). The reactions were suitable for substrates
possessing various functional groups, such as Me2N, Br, and
F3C as well as for substrates with potentially more reactive
benzylic C–H bonds (Entries 5–16).9 Although some transition
metal complexes exhibit high reactivity toward oxidative
addition of Ar–Br bonds,10 methyl 2-, 3-, and 4-bromobenzoates
underwent borylation at the C–H bond (Entries 7, 11, and 15).
Reactions of substrates having a substituent at the 3-position
only occurred at the 6-position, presumably due to steric
reasons (Entries 9–12).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
160 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 159–161