in the detection of Hg2+ until the recent report from Koide who
developed a chemodosimeter based on Hg-catalyzed hydration
of alkynes into ketones at 90 °C.6 The high temperature,
however, could not be used in thermosensitive systems such
as living cells and other biosamples. Therefore, mild reactions
for selective and sensitive Hg2+-signaling without interference
from organo-sulfide are very important.
Scheme 2
.
Hg2+-Promoted Ring Opening and Hydrolysis of
Rho-Hg1
It is known that Hg2+ promoted an irreversible hydrolysis
of isopropenyl acetate in mild conditions7 (Scheme 1), and
Scheme 1
.
Mercury-Promoted Hydrolysis of Isopropenyl
Acetate
synthesized from Rhodamine B by a three-step procedure
in a total yield of 45.6% (Scheme S1 in Supporting
Information (SI)). We anticipated that it would undergo
hydrolysis reaction when a similar but modified molecular
moiety of isopropenyl acetate was liberated by Hg2+-
facilitated ring opening of the spirocycle group (Scheme 2).
Here, Hg2+ acts not only as an analyte but also as the
promoter for the hydrolytic reaction. Compared with other
Hg2+ fluorescent probes, Rho-Hg1 shows two advantages:
first, Rho-Hg1 has single selectivity and parts per billion (ppb)
level sensitivity for Hg2+ detection in natural waters at room
temperature; second, Rho-Hg1 realizes the avoidance of
potential interference from sulfide such as cysteine and glu-
tathione in the detection of Hg2+ and then is successfully applied
in the fluorescence imaging of Hg2+ in living cells.
rhodamines undergo a great fluorescence enhancement via
their structure change from spirocyclic (nonfluorescent and
colorless) to ring-open (fluorescent and colorated) states
induced by specific chemical environments at room temper-
ature.8 We envisioned that combining the spirolactam ring
opening of rhodamine derivatives with the mild Hg2+-
promoted hydrolysis reaction of isopropenyl acetate would
serve as the fundamental reactions for a novel chemodosim-
eter for Hg2+.
Herein, a new rhodamine-based fluorescent Hg2+ chemo-
dosimeter Rho-Hg1 is presented, which has a similar
structure with isopropenyl acetate (Scheme 2). It was facilely
To explore the mechanism, Rho-Hg1/Hg2+ complexes
were detected by the ESI-TOF high resolving mass spectrum
analysis. As shown in Scheme 2, a peak at m/z 788.3576
corresponding to [Rho-Hg1 + Hg2+ - H+]+ was observed
after the addition of Hg(ClO4)2 to the ethanol solution of
Rho-Hg1 (Figure S2, SI). At the same time, the complex
exhibited obvious fluorescence emission at 580 nm and color
of amaranth with absorption at 554 (Table S1 and Figure
S1, SI). After addition of water (ethanol/water, 1/1, v/v), the
peak at m/z 788.3576 disappeared, and then a new peak of
m/z 443.2709 appeared which was confirmed as Rhodamin
B (Figure S2, SI). In the absence of Hg2+, Rho-Hg1 is
colorless and nonfluorescent due to the closed spirolactam
ring. In the presence of Hg2+, the complex of Rho-Hg1 -
Hg2+ forms in the first equilibrium resulting in ring opening,
and then the complex further hydrolyzed to brilliant pink
and strong fluorescent Rhodamine B in the presence of water.
An ethanol/water (1/1, v/v, pH 7.0) solution was selected
as a testing system to investigate the chemical response of
Rho-Hg1 to Hg2+ at room temperature. A time course study
revealed the recognizing event could complete in 8 min
(Figure S3, SI).
One challenge for the Hg2+ probe is to obtain systems
that are selective to Hg2+ over a wide range of potentially
competing ions, such as alkali or alkaline-earth metals (Na+,
K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) and heavy and transition metal ions
(Co2+, Cr3+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Ag+, Fe3+, and Cu2+).
(2) (a) Liu, B.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3156–3158. (b) Ros-
Lis, J. V.; Marcos, M. D.; Martinez-Manez, R.; Rurack, K.; Soto, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4405–4407. (c) Yang, Y.-K.; Yook, K.-J.; Tae, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16760–16761. (d) Ko, S.-K.; Yang, Y.-K.;
Tae, J.; Shin, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14150–14155. (e) Tang, B.;
Xing, Y.; Li, P.; Zhang, N.; Yu, F.; Yang, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 11666–11667. (f) Song, F.; Garner, A. L.; Koide, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 12354–12355. (g) Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8025–8029. (h) Choi, M. G.; Ryu, D. H.; Jeon,
H. L. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3717–3720. (i) Pires, M. M.; Chmielewski, J.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 837–840. (j) Dickinson, B. C.; Chang, C. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9638–9639. (k) Niu, H.-T.; Su, D.; Jiang, X.; Yang,
W.; Yin, Z.; He, J.; Cheng, J.-P. Org.Biomol.Chem. 2008, 6, 3038–3040.
(l) Lee, M. H.; Lee, S. W.; Kim, S. H.; Kang, C.; Kim, J. S. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2101–2104. (m) Jiang, W.; Wang, W. Chem. Commun. 2009,
3913–3915. (n) Choi, M. G.; Kim, Y. H.; Namgoong, J. E.; Chang, S.-K.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 3560–3562.
(3) (a) Von, B. R. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1995, 15, 483–493. (b) Harris, H. H.;
Pickering, I. J.; George, G. N. Science 2003, 301, 1203–1203.
(4) (a) Hennrich, G.; Sonnenschein, H.; Resch-Genger, U. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 5073–5074. (b) Dujols, V.; Ford, F.; Czarnik, A. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7386–7387. (c) Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Yin, S. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 2161–2163. (d) Zheng, H.; Qian, Z.-H.; Xu, L.; Yuan, F.-
F.; Lan, L.-D.; Xu, J.-G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 859–861. (e) Song, K. C.;
Kim, S. J. S.; Park, M.; Chung, K.-C.; Ahn, S.; Chang, S.-K. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 3413–3416.
(5) Winch, S.; Praharaj, T.; Fortin, D.; Lean, D. R. S. Sci. Total EnViron.
2008, 392, 242–251.
(6) Song, F.; Watanabe, S.; Floreancig, P. E.; Koide, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 16460–16461.
(7) (a) Kulish, L. F.; Korol, O. I. Ukr. Khim. Zh. (Russian Edition).
1968, 34, 495–497. (b) Byrd, J. E.; Halpern, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1970, 20, 1332–1333. (c) Abley, P.; Byrd, J. E.; Halpern, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1985–1989.
(8) (a) Kim, H. N.; Lee, M. H.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, J. S. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2008, 37, 1465–1472. (b) Beija, M.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Martinho, J. M. G.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 2410–2433.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010
477