Samanta et al.
JOCArticle
phosphoaldol reaction may be carried out with achiral
aldehydes and chiral phosphites.9b An enantioselective
method based on the phosphoaldol reaction was as also
reported;9c however, due to the intrinsic chirality of the
phosphinate group, this method actually generates a mixture
of diastereomers, which has not been analyzed for its ee
values.9c While the above chemical methods produce useful
degrees of stereocontrol at the hydroxy-substituted R-carbon
center, none of them has addressed the stereochemistry of the
phosphinate group. Simultaneously fixing the stereochemis-
try of both the R-carbon and phosphorus stereogenic centers
during the synthesis of R-hydroxyphosphonates is still a
great challenge for organic chemists.
SCHEME 1. Catalytic Enantioselective Reaction with a Race-
mic Substrate
SCHEME 2. Proposed Transition States for the Cross Aldol
Reaction of R-Ketophosphonates
Recently we reported the first organocatalytic cross aldol
reaction10 of R-ketophosphonates and ketones for the synthesis
of R-hydroxyphosphonates (eq 1).11a,b In principle, this
reaction may be used for the preparation of R-hydroxypho-
sphinates, since the structures of R-ketophosphinates and
individual enantiomeric substrates and lead to a kinetic
resolution.13 If the reaction rates k and k- are equal, a
þ
kinetic resolution is avoidable, and the reaction may be
carried out with 100% conversion of the racemic substrate,
which is the major advantage of this approach as compared
with the normal kinetic resolution where the maximum
conversion of the substrate is only 50%. Because it is
difficult to meet both requirements at the same time, it is
not surprising that only a few such chemical reactions are
known in the literature.14 Gotor and co-workers have
classified this type of reaction into the stereodivergent
parallel kinetic resolution.15 Nevertheless, it should be
pointed out that this type of reaction does not always fulfill
one of the guidelines laid down for parallel kinetic resolu-
tion by Eames:16 the reactions must afford distinct and
easily separable products. While the diastereomers obtained
in this type of reaction are distinct, they are not always easy
to separate, as with our R-hydroxyphosphinate products
(see below).
R-ketophosphonates are very similar. Nonetheless, unlike
R-ketophosphonates, R-ketophosphinates are chiral due to
the chirality of the phosphorus atom. To use a racemic
starting material (A) in a catalytic enantioselective synthesis
(Scheme 1) to obtain both diastereomeric products (B and
C) in high ee values is highly challenging because (1) the
preexisting stereogenic center in substrate A may interfere
with the enantiofacial selectivity of the catalyst so that
matched reactants generate diastereomers with higher en-
antiomeric excesses12 and (2) the preexisting stereogenic
center in substrate A may affect the reaction rates of the
It is our contention that the enantiofacial selectivity of the
aldol reaction of R-ketophosphonates is mainly determined
by the size difference between the phosphonate and the alkyl
group of the R-ketophosphonate,11b while the actual stereo-
chemistry of the phosphorus atom should have minimum
influence on the enantiofacial selectivity (Scheme 2).
Furthermore, the phosphonate group is pointing away from
the reaction center in the favored transition state11 and,
therefore, its stereochemistry should not have a major influ-
ence on the reaction rate. Thus, we hypothesized that such a
cross aldol reaction may be used for the high enantioselective
synthesis of both diastereomers of the R-hydroxyphosphi-
nates from racemic R-ketophosphinates. Herein, we wish to
report a catalytic and highly enantioselective synthesis of
both diastereomers of R-hydroxyphosphinates with simulta-
neous fixing of both the hydroxy-substituted R-carbon and
the phosphorus stereogenic centers in the products through a
proline derivative-catalyzed cross aldol reaction of racemic
acylphosphinates and ketones.
(10) For reviews on organocatalyzed cross aldol reactions, see: (a) List, B.
Synlett 2001, 1675–1686. (b) List, B. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5573–5590.
(c) List, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 548–557. (d) Notz, W.; Tanaka, F.;
Barbas, C. F., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580–597. For examples on the
cross aldol of activated ketone substrates, see: (e) Enders, D.; Grondal, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1210–1212. (f) Luppi, G.; Cozzi, P. G.;
Monari, M.; Kaptein, B.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Tomasini, C. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 7418–7421. (g) Shen, Z.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 8785–8788. (h) Tokuda, O.; Kano, T.; Gao, W.-G.; Ikemoto,
T.; Maruoka, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5103–5105. (i) Tang, Z.; Cun, L.-F.; Cui,
X.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Gong, L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1263–1266.
(j) Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3383–3386.
(k) Bøgevig, A.; Kumaragurubaran, N.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Commun.
2002, 620–621. (l) References 11a-c.
(11) For some recent examples of asymmetric synthesis of R-hydroxypho-
sphonates, see: (a) Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
7442–7443. (b) Dodda, R.; Zhao, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4911–4914.
(c) Liu, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Feng, X.; Su,
Z.; Hu, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5654–5655. (d) Pawar, V. D.;
Bettigeri, S.; Weng, S.-S.; Kao, J.-Q.; Chen, C.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 6308–6309. (e) Gondi, V. B.; Hagihara, K.; Rawal, V. H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 776–779. (f) Abell, J. P.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 10521–10523. (g) Pogatchnik, D. M.; Wiemer, D. F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 3495–3498. (h) Cermak, D. M.; Du, Y.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 388–393. (i) Skropeta, D.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 265–273. (j) Wroblewski, A. E.; Balcerzak, K. B.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 427–431. (k) Yokomatsu, T.; Yamagishi,
T.; Shibuya, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1401–1404. (l) Rowe, B. J.;
Spilling, C. D. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1701–1708. (m) Arai, T.;
Bougauchi, M.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2926–2927.
(n) Sasai, H.; Bougauchi, M.; Arai, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 2717–2720. (o) Saito, B.; Katsuki, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
4600–4602. (p) Groaning, M. D.; Rowe, B. J.; Spilling, C. D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 5485–5488.
(13) For reviews, see: (a) Hoveyda, A. H.; Didiuk, Mary T. Curr. Org.
Chem. 1998, 2, 489–526. (b) Robinson, D. E. J. E.; Bull, St. D. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1407–1446.
(14) (a) Reynolds, N. T.; Rovis, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6368–6378.
(b) Bocknack, B. M.; Wang, L.-C.; Krische, M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5421–5424. For a review on enzymatic reactions, see ref 15.
(15) For review, see: Dehli, J. R.; Gotor, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31,
365–370.
€
(12) Adam, W.; Humpf, H.-U.; Roschmann, K. J.; Saha-Moller, C. R.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5796–5800.
(16) Eames, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 885–888.
1102 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 4, 2010