S. Shabbir et al. / Journal of Catalysis 322 (2015) 104–108
105
the endothermic heat flow caused by the breakage of hydrogen
bonds between water and polymer molecules [28]. Infrared spec-
troscopic data were obtained using an Alpha-E FT-IR spectrometer
with a NaCl window for liquid samples. 1H and 13C NMR were
recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz instrument using CDCl3 solvent.
O
am
MBA
AIBN
,
/
N
N
H
o uene
T
e
M H
O
l
NIPAM
4-VP
)
(
Poly NIPAM-co-4-VP
3. Results and discussion
u
A Cl3
3.1. Polymer and catalyst behavior
rt
H
O
,
2
According to DSC data, the synthesized polymer shows inverse-
temperature solubility behavior at 47 °C, as shown by the curve in
Fig. 1. This analysis helped to make use of reaction temperatures
higher than 47 °C for the catalysis, as we predicted strong interac-
tions of the catalyst in the hydrophobic phase with organic
reactants in water. Typically, organic reactions in water are pre-
dicted to be slow; however, in our system, above this transition
temperature, known as the LCST, organic reactants are attracted
to the inner hydrophobic part of a small globule of heterogeneous
catalyst so that the reaction is accelerated.
-
Au(III) catalyst supported
Poly
(
)
NIPAM-co-4-VP
on Poly(
)
NIPAM-co-4-VP
Scheme 1. Schematics of polymerization to synthesize poly(NIPAM-co-4-VP) and
the subsequent coordination of Au (III) with poly(NIPAM-co-4-VP).
2. Experimental methods
2.1. Catalyst preparation
Coordination of Au(III) with the polymer was efficiently per-
formed at room temperature. The reaction was aided by the high
solubility (Ksp = 3.2 Â 10À25 at 25 °C) of gold trichloride in water
at room temperature. Gold has a high affinity to carbon as well
as other heteroatoms such as nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and
even O-donor ligands, such that it forms stable complexes [29].
Pyridine is one such ligand, whose coordination with gold is so
strong that it can form complexes by ligand exchange [30]. There-
fore, the developed catalyst has Au(III) strongly anchored by the
pendent pyridine groups of the polymer support, which mini-
mizes the opportunity for gold to leach out into the reaction
mixture.
Poly(NIPAM-co-4-VP) copolymer hydrogels were prepared by
free radical solution polymerization using NIPAM and 4-VP (1:1)
in toluene according to the standard procedure [27].
To coordinate Au(III) with the polymer, 0.05 g of gold trichloride
trihydrate, AuCl3Á3H2O, was added to 25 mL of aqueous solution
containing 0.1 g poly(NIPAM-co-4-VP). The resulting mixture was
sonicated for 1 min, followed by vigorous mechanical shaking at
room temperature for 12 h. The catalyst was collected after filtra-
tion, washed with methanol, and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C.
2.2. General procedure for A-3 coupling reaction
However, autoreduction of Au(III) species to metallic gold is
possible in sonicated water [31]; there are some reports of the
use of oxidative additives in A-3 coupling reactions for the regen-
eration of Au(III) species [25]. However, to verify that the Au(III)
oxidation state was maintained, we analyzed the X-ray photoelec-
tron spectrum (XPS) for fresh and recycled catalyst (XPS spectra
provided in the Supplementary Information). Both fresh and recy-
cled catalyst XPS spectra showed peaks for the Au4f7/2 peaks with a
binding energy around 84 eV [32] with no noticeable changes in
the characteristic peaks, demonstrating the stability of our catalyst.
Further quantitative analysis of Au(III) was accomplished by ICP
analysis of the freshly prepared catalyst. The loading value of the
catalyst was found to be promising (2.7 mmol Au/g of polymer).
All the chemicals were purchased from commercial sources
(Aldrich & TCI) and used as received, among them aldehydes and
solvents were used after distillation.
For a typical experiment, benzaldehyde (1.0 equiv., 2.0 mmol,
0.20 mL), pyrrolidine (1.2 equiv., 2.4 mmol, 0.20 mL), phenylacety-
lene (1.5 equiv., 3.0 mmol, 0.34 mL), and the catalyst (6.75 mol%,
0.135 mmol, 0.05 g) were added to water (2.0 mL) in a 10-mL
round-bottom flask. The reaction mixture was subjected to vigor-
ous stirring at 60 °C under argon. The reaction was monitored by
thin layer chromatography (TLC). After completion, the reaction
mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered to recover
the catalyst. The catalyst was washed with water and ethyl acetate
(10 mL each), and then the organic layer was separated by extrac-
tion with three 10-mL portions of ethyl acetate. The combined
organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and filtered using Celite-
545. The solvent was evaporated at reduced pressure, and the prod-
uct was separated by flash column chromatography. The product
was analyzed by 1H NMR. Further confirmation of the novel com-
pounds was carried out by analyses such as IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR,
and HRMS (spectra provided in the Supplementary Information).
2.3. Characterization and analysis
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive
X-ray analysis (EDXA) measurements were performed on a JEOL
high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) at an
acceleration of 300 kV. The loading value of Au(III) in the catalyst
was estimated by ICP analysis with a JY Ultima2C. ICP also helped
to check for leaching out after the recycle test. The lower critical
solution temperature (LCST) of the synthesized hydrogel was char-
acterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements
(TA Instrument, DSC 2010). The phase transition takes place with
Fig. 1. Differential scanning calorimetry curve for poly(NIPAM-co-4-VP).