G. C. Davis et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20 (2012) 2180–2188
2185
(87%) ofthe product as a thick viscous oil which was sufficientlypure
for the next step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, d): 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.78 (d,
J = 6 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.41 (m,
1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 53.4, 72.4, 125.0, 127.0, 128.8,
1.88–2.06 (m, 2H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 7.26–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.54 (m,
1H), 7.62–7.63 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 14.3, 22.8,
23.7, 23.8, 29.2, 29.5, 31.9, 35.2, 38.9, 82.3, 109.1, 123.4, 125.4,
128.3, 129.7, 134.5, 140.5, 173.5. ½a D22:4
ꢀ40 (c 1.00, CH2Cl2).
ꢂ
130.1, 134.7, 140.3, 173.7. ½a D23
ꢀ168 (c 1.00, CHCl3).
ꢂ
To a stirred solution of 0.350 g (1.74 mmol) of (R)-3-chloroman-
delic acid methyl ester in dry THF was added 0.913 g (3.48 mmol)
of PPh3 and 0.582 g (3.48 mmol) of p-nitrobenzoic acid. The solu-
tion was cooled to 0 °C and 1.31 mL (3.48 mmol) of a 40% wt. solu-
tion of DEAD was slowly added. The reaction mixture was allowed
to stir at rt. for 6 h under N2. THF was then removed in vacuo and
the crude product partitioned between H2O and EtOAc. The com-
bined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), fil-
tered and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column
chromatography eluting with 1:19 EtOAc/hexanes then 1:9
EtOAc/hexanes to give 0.523 g (86%) of the product as a sticky yel-
low oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, d): 3.74 (s, 3H), 6.14 (s, 1H),
7.34–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.54 (m, 1H), 8.25 (s,
4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 53.2, 74.8, 123.9, 126.1, 127.9,
130.0, 130.5, 131.3, 134.5, 135.1, 135.4, 151.1, 164.0, 168.5.
The prepared nitroester (4.58 g, 22.85 mmol) was added to
7.43 g (114.23 mmol) of NaN3 and the mixture was heated for
1 h at 40 °C. The solvent was then removed and the residue puri-
fied by flash column chromatography eluting with 1:5 EtOAc/hex-
anes to give 3.291 g (72%) of a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, d): 3.53 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 5.13 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H),
7.28–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.41 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3,
d): 53.4, 72.3, 125.0, 126.9, 128.9, 130.1, 134.7, 140.3, 173.8.
To a 3.091 g (15.41 mmol) of (S)-3-chloromandelic acid methyl
ester was added 100 mL of 5% NaOH. The reaction mixture was
heated to 40 °C for one and then allowed to cool to rt. The reaction
was then acidified with 1 N and extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢃ 20 mL).
The combined organic fractions were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and
concentrated in vacuo. The solid residue was recrystallized from
hot toluene to give 2.768 g (96%) of a white crystalline solid 5.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, d): 5.05 (s, 1H), 7.32–7.36 (m, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, d): 72.4, 126.0, 127.0, 128.2, 130.7,
5.1.7. R-(ꢀ)-2-(3-Chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-nonanoic acid
amide ((R)-(ꢀ)-1)
To a flame dried round bottom flask was added the dioxolanone
4 (0.948 g, 2.69 mmol) in 5 mL or dry MeOH. To this was added
20 mL of 7 N NH3 in MeOH dropwise. This was allowed to stir over
16 h while monitoring by TLC (1:1 hexanes/EtOAc). The reaction
mixture was then poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2
(4 ꢃ 10 mL). The combined organic layers were then washed with
brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated. The residue was
purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 1:1 hex-
anes/EtOAc to yield 0.659 g (86%). mp 78–79 °C; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3, d): 0.85 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 1.23–1.29 (m, 10H),
1.94–2.01 (m, 1H), 2.16–2.22 (m, 1H), 3.19 (s, 1H), 5.65 (br s,
1H), 6.47 (br s, 1H), 7.23–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.58–
7.59 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 14.3, 22.8, 23.5, 29.3,
29.8, 32.0, 39.6, 78.8, 123.9, 125.9, 128.1, 129.9, 134.6, 144.6,
176.3. ½a 2D3:1
ꢀ24 (c 0.50, CHCl3).
ꢂ
5.1.8. (2S,5S)-2-(tert-Butyl)-5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5-heptyl-
1,3-dioxolan-4-one (7)
Prepared in the same manner as (2R,5R)-2-(tert-butyl)-5-(3-
chlorophenyl)-5-heptyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-one using (2S,5S)-2-(tert-
butyl)-5-(3-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-one.
1.414 g
yield
(71%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, d): 0.84 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (s,
9H), 1.16–1.35 (m, 10H), 1.88–2.06 (m, 2H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 7.26–
7.30 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.62–7.63 (m, 1H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 14.3, 22.8, 23.7, 23.8, 29.2, 29.5, 31.9, 35.2,
38.9, 82.3, 109.1, 123.4, 125.4, 128.3, 129.7, 134.5, 140.5, 173.5.
5.1.9. S-(+)-2-(3-Chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-nonanoic acid amide
((S)-(+)-1)
Prepared in the same manner as (R)-(ꢀ)-2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-
hydroxy-nonanoic acid amide using (2S,5S)-2-(tert-butyl)-5-(3-
chlorophenyl)-5-heptyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-one. 0.683 g yield (60%)
mp 78–79 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, d): 0.85 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H),
1.23–1.29 (m, 10H), 1.94–2.01 (m, 1H), 2.16–2.22 (m, 1H), 3.19
(s, 1H), 5.65 (br s, 1H), 6.47 (br s, 1H), 7.23–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.44–
7.47 (m, 1H), 7.58–7.59 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d):
14.3, 22.8, 23.5, 29.3, 29.8, 32.0, 39.6, 78.8, 123.9, 125.9, 128.1,
133.5, 143.3, 174.2. ½a D23
ꢂ
+123 (c 3.00, H2O).
5.1.5. (2S,5S)-2-(tert-Butyl)-5-(3-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-
one (6)
Prepared in the same manner as (2R,5R)-2-(tert-butyl)-5-(3-
chlorophenyl)-5-heptyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-one (3) using (S)-(+)-3-
chloromandelic acid 5. Mp 40–42 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
d): 1.06 (s, 9H), 5.24 (s, 1H), 5.30 (d, J = 1 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.34 (m,
3H), 7.44 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 21.1, 35.2, 91.6,
129.9, 134.6, 144.6, 176.3. ½a D23:1
ꢂ
+24 (c 0.50, CHCl3).
122.9, 127.3, 128.1, 133.5, 137.1, 173.5. ½a D25
ꢂ
ꢀ4.0 (c 1.00, CHCl3).
5.2. X-ray crystallography
5.1.6. (2R,5R)-2-(tert-Butyl)-5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5-heptyl-1,3-
dioxolan-4-one (4)
Both (ICM-1-136-1) (S)-2-(3-chloro-phenyl)-2-hydroxy-nona-
noic acid amide and (ICM-1-136-2) (R)-2-(3-chloro-phenyl)-2-hy-
droxy-nonanoic acid amide were crystallized from 70% ethanol
using slow evaporation method at room temperature. The diffrac-
tion data were collected at 100 K using a Rigaku R-axis Rapid dif-
To a flame-dried round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic
stir bar was added diisopropylamine in THF under N2. The flask
was cooled to -78 °C and BuLi was added in one portion. The cool-
ing bath was removed and replaced with an ice-water bath. Mean-
while, (2R,5R)-2-(tert-butyl)-5-(3-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-
one, heptyl iodide, and HMPA were dissolved in THF and place in
a separate flame dried round bottom under an N2 atmosphere.
The flask was cooled to ꢀ78 °C and the previously prepared LDA
was added dropwise over 15 min. The reaction mixture was main-
tained at a constant temperature of ꢀ78 °C for 3 h at which time it
was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution. The product was
then extracted with Et2O, the organic layers combined, dried
(Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude 96:4 mix-
ture of diastereomers was separated by flash column chromatogra-
phy carefully eluting with 1% Et2O in hexanes. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, d): 0.84 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (s, 9H), 1.16–1.35 (m, 10H),
fractometer, equipped with a Mo K
a radiation source (60 kV,
40 mA). The radiation was monochromatized with graphite mono-
chromator. HKL-200031,32 was used for control of the data collec-
tion as well as for data reduction. The structure was solved and
refined by the HKL-3000SM system33 which is integrated with
SHELXS, SHELXL34 and O.35 Absolute configurations of both com-
pounds were determined using anomalous dispersion. Details of
data collection, processing and refinement (see Supplementary
Table 1). Interestingly both compounds crystallized with two
molecules in asymmetric unit (see Supplementary Fig. 1). The
molecules of the (+)-2-(3-chloro-phenyl)-2-hydroxy-nonanoic acid
amide forming crystals have two different conformations of the
aliphatic chains.