COMMUNICATION
a,b-unsaturated aldehydes 2 as potential substrates for a
cascade reaction made up of a Michael addition and an
aldol reaction.[12] In planning our investigation of the reac-
tion, the question arose as to whether the reaction of an
indole-2-carbaldehyde with an a,b-unsaturated aldehyde
leads to the classical Friedel–Crafts/aldol/dehydration prod-
ucts (Scheme 2, path a) or whether, after the aza-Michael
addition, an intramolecular aldol reaction would occur, lead-
phenyl ring or the substitution pattern, participated in this
process in high efficiency (Table 2, entries 1–9). Unfortu-
nately, when 2-furyl enal (2j) was used, the major product
was the isomeric product 5aj (Table 2, entry 10 and Sche-
me 3a).[15] For less reactive alkyl a,b-unsaturated aldehydes,
the reaction showed much lower reactivity. This phenomen-
on was observed in the asymmetric N-allylic alkylation of in-
doles with Morita–Baylis–Hillman carbonates.[7c] The indole-
2-carbaldehydes with electron-donating or -withdrawing sub-
stituents at the C5-position underwent the reaction with
good yields and stereocontrol
ing to pyrrolo
b).
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehydes (Scheme 2, path
(Table 2, entries 11–13). Re-
markably, nearly enantiomeri-
cally pure compounds can be
readily obtained by a single re-
crystallization (Table 2, en-
tries 1 and 9).
Furthermore, we found that
all
pyrroloACTHUNGTERNNU[G 1,2-a]indole-2-car-
Scheme 2. Proposed C3- or N-selective alkylation of indole-2-carbaldehydes with a,b-unsaturated aldehydes.
baldehyde derivatives 4 were
stable in the air at room tem-
To test our hypothesis, our experiments began with the
addition of indole-2-carbaldehyde (1a) to cinnamaldehyde
(2a) by the readily available diphenylprolinol TMS ether 3c
(TMS=trimethylsilyl). Indeed, the initial experiments
showed that the use of catalytic amounts of a secondary
amine enabled a reaction that resulted in the formation of
perature. However, conversion of compound 4aa into the
tautomeric form 5aa took place spontaneously and was
complete within 24 h in a solution in CDCl3 at room temper-
Table 1. Catalyst screening and reaction optimization.[a]
the pyrroloACHTUNGTRENNUNG[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehyde 4aa. On the basis of
these observations, we decided to develop an asymmetric
version of this domino reaction. Next, chiral pyrrolidines
3a–d were screened for promoting the cascade reactions be-
cause they can activate a,b-unsaturated aldehydes by the
formation of active iminium species.[13] The results showed
that the catalysts probed exhibited significantly different
catalytic activity toward the process. Poor catalytic activities
were observed for l-proline (3a) and the MacMillan cata-
lyst, 3b[14] (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Fortunately, the diphe-
nylprolinol ether 3c catalyzed the reaction efficiently to
afford 4aa in moderate yield and promising enantiomeric
excess (ee) (Table 1, entry 3). To our surprise, catalyst 3d, a
general catalyst for the Michael addition of a,b-unsaturated
aldehydes, was not active in this reaction (Table 1, entry 4).
To optimize the reaction conditions further, the additives
and solvents were varied. We found that the use of 4 ꢁ mo-
lecular sieves (MS) as an additive and toluene as the solvent
gave the best results (Table 1, entry 11). Experiments run at
08C showed similar results to those conducted at room tem-
perature; however, a longer reaction time was required
(Table 1, entry 16).
Entry
Catalyst
Solvent
Additive
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3a
3b
3c
3d
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
none
none
none
none
<10
<10
47
<10
38
40
<10
48
45
62
67
81
n.d.[d]
n.d.[d]
83
n.d.[d]
84
PhCO2H
CH3CO2H
CF3CO2H
Et3N
CH3CO2Na
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
4 ꢁ MS[e]
76
n.d.[d]
66
9
THF
THF
83
83
92
53
42
35
60
93
10
11
12
13
14
15
16[f]
toluene
CHCl3
CH2Cl2
ether
MTBE
toluene
77
43
71
58
Having established optimal reaction conditions, we next
examined the scope and limitations of this methodology
with regard to the a,b-unsaturated aldehyde and indole-2-
carbaldehyde substrates. The results showed that, in general,
the reactions took place efficiently in moderate to good
yields with good to excellent levels of enantioselectivity
(Table 2). Aromatic a,b-unsaturated aldehydes, regardless of
electron-donating or -withdrawing substituents on the
[a] Unless otherwise specified, the reaction was carried out with 1a
(0.24 mmol) and 2a (0.20 mmol) in the presence of an organocatalyst 3
(0.04 mmol), additive (0.04 mmol), and solvent (1.0 mL) for 72 h.
[b] Yield of the isolated product. [c] Determined by chiral HPLC on a
Chiralpak AD column. [d] Not determined. [e] 4 ꢁ MS (100 mg) were
used. [f] The reaction was performed at 08C for 120 h. MTBE=methyl
tert-butyl ether.
Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 440 – 444
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
441