ChemComm
Communication
(239 cm3 cmꢀ3) and is a promising technological milestone
especially for North American markets, where shale gas explora-
tion currently leads to a boom of natural gas driven cars and
trucks. At 65 bar, the total methane uptake is 410 mg gꢀ1, which
is the highest value reported in the literature and is only slightly
lower than the DOE target of 500 mg gꢀ1
.
In summary, the assembly of cuboctahedral building blocks
into ultrahighly porous frameworks with specific surface areas
up to 6344 m2 gꢀ1 is a successful strategy for the realization
of wide open pores and a high density of open metal sites in
parallel. The latter is not only crucial to achieve high gas storage
performance for energy carriers in DUT-76 but moreover an ideal
concept to safely store ethene, an important phytohormone
and high-volume chemical intermediate that will experience
increased growth in the future.
Fig. 3 Excess (circles) and total (squares) ethene adsorption isotherms of
DUT-75 at 298 K; excess (diamonds) and total (triangles) ethene adsorp-
tion isotherms of DUT-76 at 298 K.
This work was financially supported by the German Research
Foundation (DFG; SPP 1362) and the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
fu¨r Materialien und Energie.
Ethene is the lightest olefin and the largest volume organic
chemical, stored in large quantities in petrochemical industry
for the production of polymers and other organic chemicals.
Transport as a fluid is a high risk scenario due to the high
reactivity and affinity for autodecomposition and polymerization
rendering adsorptive storage technologies as highly attractive
solutions for save delivery sources.17 Ethene uptake of DUT-75
and DUT-76 was investigated up to 70 bar at 298 K.
The high concentration of coordinatively unsaturated metal
sites in DUT-75 and DUT-76 is responsible for the high storage
performance, due to the selective interaction with the double
bond.18 In fact, the investigated MOFs can adsorb a huge
amount of ethene at room temperature (Fig. 3): the maximum
excess uptake is 21.5 mmol gꢀ1 for DUT-75 at 40 bar and
30 mmol gꢀ1 for DUT-76 at 45 bar. These values are the highest
ever reported in the literature.
Beyond these enormous capacities for ethene, the novel
MOFs are also excellent materials for hydrogen (Fig. S9, ESI†),
carbon dioxide (Fig. S10 and S11, ESI†), and methane (Fig. S12,
ESI†) storage. The excess hydrogen adsorption of DUT-76
at 77 K reaches a maximum value of 83 mg gꢀ1 at 60 bar (total:
183 mg gꢀ1; 100 bar) which is one of the highest excess storage
capacities for hydrogen reported so far (DUT-49: 80 mg gꢀ1
(excess), 165 mg gꢀ1 (total),8 MOF-210: 86 mg gꢀ1 (excess),
167 mg gꢀ1 (total)).12 Only NU-100 shows substantially higher
maximum excess hydrogen uptake (99 mg gꢀ1).19 In terms of
total uptake at 100 bar DUT-76 (total: 183 mg gꢀ1) surpasses
even NU-100 (total: 164 mg gꢀ1).
Notes and references
‡ Crystalligraphic data: DUT-75: C42H20Cu33N2O15, M = 983.22 g molꢀ1
,
,
cubic, Pm3m, a = 27.860(3) Å, V = 21624(4) Å , Z = 6, rcalc = 0.453 g cmꢀ3
%
l = 0.88561 Å, T = 293 K, reflections collected/unique 8156/4428,
R1 = 0.0555, wR2 = 0.1817, S = 0.911, largest diff. peak 0.272 e Åꢀ3
and hole ꢀ0.502 e Åꢀ3; DUT-76: C54H28Cu3N2O15, M = 1135.40 g molꢀ1
,
,
cubic, Pm3m, a = 33.970(4) Å, V = 39200(8) Å , Z = 6, rcalc = 0.289 g cmꢀ3
3
%
l = 0.88561 Å, T = 293 K, reflections collected/unique 13443/7208,
R1 = 0.0453, wR2 = 0.1572, S = 1.060, largest diff. peak 0.309 e Åꢀ3
and hole ꢀ0.329 e Åꢀ3. CCDC 982441 and 982442.
1 M. R. Miller and I. L. Megson, Br. J. Pharmacol., 2007, 151, 305.
2 N. Keller, M.-N. Ducamp, D. Robert and V. Keller, Chem. Rev., 2013,
113, 5029.
3 (a) A. B. Bleecker and H. Kende, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2000,
16, 1; (b) S. P. Burg and E. A. Burg, Science, 1965, 148, 1190.
´
4 (a) A. Seabra, M. Rai and N. Duran, J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol.,
2014, 23, 1; (b) S. Sortino, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 2903.
5 (a) S. Keskin and S. Kızılel, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2011, 50, 1799;
(b) B. Xiao, P. S. Wheatley, X. B. Zhao, A. J. Fletcher, S. Fox, A. G. Rossi,
I. L. Megson, S. Bordiga, L. Regli, K. M. Thomas and R. E. Morris,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1203; (c) A. C. McKinlay, J. F. Eubank,
S. Wuttke, B. Xiao, P. S. Wheatley, P. Bazin, J. C. Lavalley, M. Daturi,
A. Vimont, G. De Weireld, P. Horcajada, C. Serre and R. E. Morris,
Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 1592; (d) S. R. Miller, E. Alvarez, L. Fradcourt,
T. Devic, S. Wuttke, P. S. Wheatley, N. Steunou, C. Bonhomme,
C. Gervais, D. Laurencin, R. E. Morris, A. Vimont, M. Daturi,
P. Horcajada and C. Serre, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7773.
6 A. Czaja, E. Leung, N. Trukhan and U. Mu¨ller, in Metal-Organic Frame-
works: Applications from Catalysis to Gas Storage, ed. D. Farruseng,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011, pp. 339–352.
7 (a) J. J. Perry, J. A. Perman and M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2009, 38, 1400; (b) J.-R. Li and H.-C. Zhou, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 893;
(c) V. Guillerm, D. Kim, J. F. Eubank, R. Luebke, X. Liu, K. Adil,
M. S. Lah and M. Eddaoudi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 6141.
8 U. Stoeck, S. Krause, V. Bon, I. Senkovska and S. Kaskel, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 10841.
The excellent methane storage capacity of DUT-75 (maxi-
mum excess 240 mg gꢀ1 at 90 bar and 298 K) and DUT-76
(290 mg gꢀ1 at 110 bar and 298 K) exceeds the capacities of
9 W. Lu, D. Yuan, T. A. Makal, Z. Wei, J.-R. Li and H.-C. Zhou, Dalton
Trans., 2013, 42, 1708.
nearly all high-performance-materials in this field20 and is only 10 U. Stoeck, G. Nickerl, U. Burkhardt, I. Senkovska and S. Kaskel,
surpassed by DUT-49 (308 mg gꢀ1) so far.8 Due to the enormous
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 17335.
11 M. O’Keeffe, M. A. Peskov, S. J. Ramsden and O. M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem.
specific pore volume DUT-76 has a gigantic gravimetric uptake
Res., 2008, 41, 1782.
of 633 mg gꢀ1 at a pressure of 140 bar (commercial tank systems 12 H. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y. B. Go, N. Aratani, S. B. Choi, E. Choi,
¨
A. O. Yazaydin, R. Q. Snurr, M. O’Keeffe, J. Kim and O. M. Yaghi,
operate even higher at 200 bar) translating into a specific
volumetric storage capacity of 243 cm3 cmꢀ3. This value matches
already the density of compressed natural gas at 200 bar
Science, 2010, 329, 424.
´
13 G. Ferey, C. Mellot-Draznieks, C. Serre, F. Millange, J. Dutour,
S. Surble and I. Margiolaki, Science, 2005, 309, 2040.
1048 | Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 1046--1049
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015