Iosub et al.
JOCArticle
solution. The ether layer was dried and concentrated in vacuo
to afford 46 mg (68%) of 8a as a yellow oil; IR (neat) 3387,
1735 cm-1; 1H NMR (200 MHz) δ 3.70 (s, 3 H), 1.67-1.40 (m,
4 H), 1.30 (s, 3 H) superimposed on 1.30-1.05 (m, 8 H), 0.86 (t,
J=6.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (50 MHz) δ 178.1, 57.8, 52.0, 41.1,
31.6, 29.4, 26.3, 24.1, 22.5, 14.0; mass spectrum (EI) (m/z, %)
128 (Mþ - CO2Me, 100), 102 (30). HRMS (EI) calcd for
41.2, 41.0, 29.3, 29.2, 23.43, 23.35, 8.7, 8.6; mass spectrum (CI)
(m/z, %) 355 (100, Mþ þ 1). HRMS (EI) calcd for C21H26N2O3
354.1943 (Mþ), found 354.1927. [R]20D -61 (c 7.0, chloroform).
The de of 52% was calculated by integration of doublets from
the major and minor diastereomers at δ 3.00 and 3.07 ppm,
respectively. Their chemical shifts matched those observed in a
sample obtained similarly from the racemic half-ester 5g.
2-Benzyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]pentanoic Acid Methyl
Ester (9h). The product was obtained in 92% yield as a mixture
of diastereomers from the treatment of half-ester 5h by the same
procedure as for the conversion of 5d to 9d; colorless oil; IR
C8H18N (Mþ - CO2Me) 128.1439, found 128.1443. [R]20
D
þ8.0 (c 1.8, chloroform). The ee (68%) was measured by
integration of well-separated methyl ester signals in the 1H
NMR spectrum of an equimolar mixture of 8a and R-(-)-O-
acetylmandelic acid. This was compared with a 1:1 mixture of
diastereomers prepared similarly from racemic 8a, in turn
obtained from the racemic half-ester 5a.
(film) 3359, 1742, 1632 cm-1 1H NMR (400 MHz) major
;
diastereomer: δ 7.40-7.13 (m, 8 H), 6.95-6.87 (m, 2 H), 5.18
(br s, 1 H), 4.83 (br s, 1 H), 4.79-4.72 (m, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.70
(d, J=13.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.00 (d, J=13.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.56-2.50 (m,
1 H), 1.79-1.72 (m, 1 H), 1.47-1.42 (m, 1 H), 1.43 (d, J=6.8 Hz,
3 H), 1.30-1.15 (m, 1 H), 0.90-0.84 (m, 3 H); minor diastereo-
mer: 3.07 (d, J=13.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.51 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 3 H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz) major diastereomer: δ 174.6, 156.1, 144.9,
137.0, 130.0, 128.6, 128.1, 127.2, 126.6, 126.1, 65.7, 52.5, 50.2,
41.4, 38.4, 23.4, 17.7, 14.1; mass spectrum (CI) (m/z, %) 369
(100, Mþ þ H). HRMS (CI) calcd for C22H29N2O3 369.2178
(Mþ þ H), found 369.2168. Anal. Calcd for C22H28N2O3: C,
Curtius Rearrangement with Formation of Ureas. Typical
Procedure: 2-Cyclohexyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]propanoic
Acid Methyl Ester (9d). A solution of half-ester 5d (164 mg, 0.765
mmol), triethylamine (0.16 mL, 1.2 mmol), and DPPA (0.17 mL,
0.79 mmol) in 5 mL of toluene was refluxed for 5 h. It was cooled
to room temperature and (R)-(þ)-R-methylbenzylamine (0.18
mL, 1.4 mmol) was added. The mixture was refluxed an addi-
tional 20 h, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and
the residue was chromatographed (20-30% ethyl acetate-
hexanes) to afford 133 mg (52%) of product 9d as a single
diastereomer; white solid, mp 184.5-185.5 °C; IR (film) 3346,
71.71; H, 7.66; N, 7.60. Found: C, 71.47; H, 7.67; N, 7.36. [R]20
D
-62 (c 2.1, chloroform). The de of 79% was calculated by
integration of the doublets from the major and minor diaster-
eomers at δ 3.00 and 3.07 ppm, respectively. Their chemical
shifts matched those observed in a sample obtained similarly
from the racemic half-ester 5h.
1
1745, 1635 cm-1; H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.32-7.24 (m, 5 H),
4.91 (br s, 1 H), 4.88 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.70-4.66 (quintet, J=
6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.62 (s, 3 H), 1.68-1.57 (m, 4 H), 1.41 (s, 3 H), 1.40
(d, J=6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.23-0.72 (m, 7 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz) δ
175.2, 157.0, 144.3, 128.9, 127.5, 126.1, 62.9, 52.3, 51.0, 45.7,
27.6, 27.4, 26.61, 26.55, 26.4, 23.9, 19.4; mass spectrum (EI)
(m/z, %) 332 (4, Mþ), 273 (12), 126 (66), 102 (100). HRMS (EI)
calcd for C19H28N2O3 332.2100 (Mþ), found 332.2118. Anal.
Calcd for C19H28N2O3: C, 68.64; H, 8.49; N, 8.43. Found: C,
68.67; H, 8.38; N, 8.09. [R]20D þ42 (c 2.9, chloroform). A sample
prepared similarly from racemic 5d for comparison showed
clearly separated methyl ester peaks.
2-Methyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]-4-phenylbutanoic Acid
Methyl Ester (9i). The product was obtained in 78% yield as a
mixture of diastereomers from the treatment of half-ester 5i by
the same procedure as for the conversion of 5d to 9d; white solid,
mp 151-153 °C; IR (film) 3362, 1738, 1629 cm-1; 1H NMR (300
MHz) major diastereomer: δ 7.36-7.14 (m, 8 H), 7.00-6.98 (m,
2 H), 5.48 (br s, 1 H), 5.23 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.74 -4.69 (m,
1 H), 3.56 (s, 3 H), 2.48-2.34 (m, 2 H), 2.24-2.12 (m, 1 H),
The following compounds were prepared similarly to 9d.
2-Cyclohexylmethyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]butanoic Acid
Methyl Ester (9e). The product was obtained in 78% yield as a
single diastereomer from the treatment of half-ester 5e by the
same procedure as for the conversion of 5d to 9d; white solid; mp
160-162.5 °C; IR (film) 3316, 1738, 1635 cm-1; 1H NMR (300
MHz) δ 7.35-7.22 (m, 5 H), 5.47 (s, 1 H), 4.93 (d, J=6.6 Hz,
1 H), 4.68 (quintet, J=6.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.66 (s, 3 H), 2.46-2.29 (m,
2 H), 1.80-1.43 (m, 6 H), 1.42 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.23-0.77 (m,
6 H), 0.64 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3 H, superimposed on m, 1 H); 13C NMR
(75 MHz) δ 176.3, 155.8, 144.4, 128.9, 127.5, 126.1, 64.3, 52.6,
50.9, 43.4, 34.3, 34.0, 33.1, 30.0, 26.5, 26.42, 26.39, 23.9, 8.4;
mass spectrum (CI) (m/z, %) 361 (100, Mþ þ H), 329 (25), 257
(28), 120 (48). HRMS (CI) calcd for C21H33N2O3: 361.2491
(Mþ þ H); found: 361.2504. Anal. Calcd for C21H32N2O3: C,
2.12-1.99 (m, 1 H), 1.53 (s, 3 H), 1.41 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3 H); 13
C
NMR (100 MHz) major diastereomer: δ 175.8, 156.3, 144.4,
141.4, 128.9, 128.7, 128.4, 127.5, 126.1, 126.0, 60.0, 52.7, 50.8,
38.6, 30.7, 24.2, 23.8; mass spectrum (CI) (m/z, %) 355 (100,
M
H), found 355.2024. Anal. Calcd for C21H26N2O3: C, 71.16; H,
þ þ H). HRMS (CI) calcd for C21H27N2O3 355.2022 (Mþ þ
7.39; N, 7.90. Found: C, 70.77; H, 7.34; N, 7.56. [R]20 þ45
D
(c 1.3, chloroform). The de of 80% was calculated by integration
of the methyl ester singlets from the major and minor diastereo-
mers at δ 3.56 and 3.62 ppm, respectively. Their chemical shifts
matched those observed in a sample obtained similarly from the
racemic half-ester 5i.
2-Ethyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]-4-phenylbutanoic Acid
Methyl Ester (9j). The product was obtained in 70% yield as a
mixture of diastereomers from the treatment of half-ester 5j by
the same procedure as for the conversion of 5d to 9d; colorless
oil; IR (film) 3359, 1738, 1635 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz) major
diastereomer: δ 7.39-7.20 (m, 8 H), 7.03-7.01 (m, 2 H), 5.52 (br
s, 1 H), 5.08 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.76 (quintet, J=6.7 Hz, 1 H),
3.59 (s, 3 H), 2.77-2.69 (m, 1 H), 2.49-2.37 (m, 2 H), 2.14-1.97
(m, 2 H), 1.77-1.68 (m, 1 H), 1.48 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.72 (t, J=
7.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz) major diastereomer: δ 175.2,
155.9, 144.5, 141.6, 128.9, 128.7, 128.3, 127.5, 126.1, 125.9,
65.0, 52.7, 50.9, 37.3, 30.7, 29.2, 23.9, 8.6; mass spectrum (EI)
(m/z, %) 264 (25), 162 (47), 105 (64), 91 (100). HRMS (EI) calcd
69.97; H, 8.95; N, 7.77. Found: C, 70.03; H, 8.99; N, 7.60. [R]20
D
þ38 (c 3.0, chloroform). A sample prepared similarly from
racemic 5e for comparison showed clearly separated methyl
ester peaks.
2-Benzyl-2-[3-(1-phenethyl)ureido]butanoic Acid Methyl Ester
(9g). The product was obtained in 70% yield as a mixture of
diastereomers from the treatment of half-ester 5g by the same
procedure as for the conversion of 5d to 9d; colorless oil; IR
(film) 3336, 1738, 1632 cm-1 1H NMR (400 MHz) major
;
diastereomer δ 7.35-7.15 (m, 8 H), 7.01-6.92 (m, 2 H),
5.42-5.31 (m, 2 H), 4.79-4.73 (m, 1 H), 3.71 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (d,
J=14.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.00 (d, J=13.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.56-2.47 (m, 1 H),
1.81 (sextet, J=7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.37 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3 H), 0.68 (t, J=
7.3 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz) both diastereomers: δ 174.4,
174.3, 156.2, 156.1, 145.0, 144.5, 137.1, 130.0, 129.9, 128.63,
128.58, 128.1, 127.1, 126.6, 126.13, 126.05, 66.5, 66.0, 52.4, 50.1,
for C22H28N2O3 368.2100, found 368.2112. [R]20 þ36 (c 1.5,
D
chloroform). The de of 93% was calculated by integration of the
methyl ester singlets from the major and minor diastereomers at
δ 3.59 and 3.65 ppm, respectively. Their chemical shifts matched
those observed in a sample obtained similarly from the racemic
half-ester 5j.
1618 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 5, 2010