D. Sriram et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 120–123
123
4.1.8. N-[(4aS)-2-(3-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-10-oxo-2,10-dihydro-
4aH-chromeno[3,2-c]pyridin-3-yl]methyl-2,4-
dichlorobenzenecarboxamide (4g)
conversion of MTT into a formazan product using the Promega Cell
Titer 96 non-radioactive cell proliferation assay.
Yield: 70%; m.p: 154–155 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d ppm: 2.06 (s,
4.4. In-vivo antimycobacterial activity
3H), 4.30 (dd, 2H), 5.09 (m, 1H), 5.72 (d, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H, D2O
exchangeable), 6.64 (q,1H), 7.02–8.18 (m,10H); Anal (C26H19Cl2N3O3)
C, H, N.
One compound was tested for efficacy against MTB at a dose of
25 mg/kg in six-week-old female CD-1 mice six per group. In this
model, the mice were infected intravenously through caudal vein
approximately 107 viable M. tuberculosis ATCC 35801. Drug treat-
ment by intra peritoneal route began after 10 days of inoculation of
the animal with microorganism and continued for 10 days. After 35
days post infection the spleens and right lungs were aseptically
removed and ground in a tissue homogenizer, the number of viable
organisms was determined by serial 10-fold dilutions and subse-
quent inoculation onto 7H10 agar plates. Cultures were incubated
at 37 ꢀC in ambient air for 4 weeks prior to counting. Bacterial
counts were measured, and compared with the counts from
negative controls (vehicle treated) in lung and in spleen.
4.1.9. N-[(4aS)-2-(3,5-dibromo-2-pyridinyl)-10-oxo-2,10-dihydro-
4aH-chromeno[3,2-c]pyridin-3-yl]methyl-4-
fluorobenzenecarboxamide (5h)
Yield: 70%; m.p: 121–122 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d ppm: 4.30
(dd, 2H), 5.09 (m, 1H), 5.72 (d, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H, D2O exchangeable),
7.02 (q, 1H), 7.46–8.10 (m, 10H); Anal (C25H16Br2FN3O3) C, H, N.
4.1.10. N-[(4aS)-2-(3-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-10-oxo-2,10-dihydro-
4aH-chromeno[3,2-c]pyridin-3-yl]methyl-2-phenoxyacetamide (4i)
Yield: 79%; m.p: 103–105 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d ppm: 2.06 (s,
3H), 4.30 (dd, 2H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 5.39 (m, 1H), 5.72 (d, 1H), 6.62–6.68
(m, 5H), 7.02–8.19 (m, 9H); Anal (C27H23N3O4) C, H, N.
Acknowledgements
4.1.11. N-[(4aS)-2-(3,5-dibromo-2-pyridinyl)-10-oxo-2,10-dihydro-
The authors are thankful to Dr. Vanaja Kumar, Deputy Director,
Tuberculosis Research Center, Chennai, India for providing bacterial
strains and technical guidance in biological screening. The authors
are also thankful to Department of Biotechnology (BT/01/COE/05/
06/01), Government of India for their financial assistance.
4aH-chromeno[3,2-c]pyridin-3-yl]methyl-2-naphthamide (5j)
Yield: 80%; m.p: 138–139 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d ppm: 4.31
(dd, 2H), 5.1 (m, 1H), 5.72 (d, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H, D2O exchangeable),
7.02 (q, 1H), 7.2–8.10 (m, 13H); Anal (C29H19Br2N3O3) C, H, N.
4.1.12. N-[(4aS)-2-(3-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-10-oxo-2,10-dihydro-
4aH-chromeno[3,2-c]pyridin-3-yl]methyl-7-methyl-2-
naphthamide (4k)
References
Yield: 76%; m.p: 147–148 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d ppm: 2.06 (s,
[1] M. Zignol, M.S. Hosseini, A. Wright, C.L. Weezenbeek, P. Nunn, C.J. Watt,
B.G. Williams, C. Dye, J. Infect. Dis. 194 (2006) 479–485.
[2] C. Wells, J.P. Cegielski, Emerging Infect. Dis. 13 (2007) 380–387.
[3] D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, M. Dinakaran, R. Thirumurugan, J. Antimicrob. Che-
mother. 59 (2007) 1194–1196.
[4] D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, R. Thirumurugan, R.K. Pavana, J. Med. Chem. 49
(2006) 3448–3450.
[5] R.R. Kumar, S. Perumal, P. Senthilkumar, P. Yogeeswari, D. Sriram, J. Med.
Chem. 51 (2008) 5731–5735.
3H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 4.30 (dd, 2H), 5.09 (m, 1H), 5.72 (d, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H,
D2O exchangeable), 6.64 (m, 1H), 7.02 (m, 1H), 7.23–8.37 (m, 12H);
Anal (C31H25N3O3) C, H, N.
4.2. In-vitro antimycobacterial activity
[6] M. Dinakaran, P. Senthilkumar, P. Yogeeswari, A. China, V. Nagaraja, D. Sriram,
Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 31 (2008) 337–344.
[7] D. Sriram, P. Senthilkumar, M. Dinakaran, P. Yogeeswari, A. China, V. Nagaraja,
J. Med. Chem. 50 (2007) 6232–6239.
[8] R.R. Kumar, S. Perumal, P. Senthilkumar, P. Yogeeswari, D. Sriram, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 6459–6462.
[9] M. Dinakaran, P. Senthilkumar, P. Yogeeswari, A. China, V. Nagaraja, D. Sriram,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16 (2008) 3408–3418.
[10] M. Dinakaran, P. Senthilkumar, P. Yogeeswari, A. China, V. Nagaraja, D. Sriram,
Med. Chem. 4 (2008) 482–491.
[11] A.K. Baruah, D. Prajapati, J.S. Sandhu, Tetrahedron 44 (1998) 1241–1244.
[12] A.O. Fitton, J.R. Frost, H. Suschitzky, Tetrahedron Lett. 16 (1975) 2099–2103.
[13] V.Y. Sosnovskikh, R.A. Irgashev, I.A. Khalymbadzha, P.A. Slepukhin, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 48 (2007) 6297–6299.
All compounds were screened for their in-vitro antimycobacterial
activity against MTB, MDR-TB and MC2 in Middlebrook 7H11agar
medium supplemented with OADC by agar dilution method similar
to that recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Labo-
ratory Standards for the determination of MIC in duplicate. The MDR-
TB clinical isolate was obtained from Tuberculosis Research Center,
Chennai, India, and was resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, etham-
butol and ofloxacin. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is
defined as the minimum concentration of compound required to
give complete inhibition of bacterial growth.
[14] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1995. Antimycobacterial
susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proposed standard M24-
T. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
[15] L.L. Gundersen, J. Nissen-Meyer, B. Spilsberg, J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002)
1383–1386.
4.3. Cytotoxicity
Some compounds were further examined for toxicity (IC50) in
a mammalian Vero cell line at concentrations of 62.5
72 h of exposure, viability was assessed on the basis of cellular
mg/mL. After
[16] D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, S.J. Basha, D.R. Radha, V. Nagaraja, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 13 (2005) 5774–5778.