Journal of Chemistry
5
(a)
(b)
Figure 2: e comparison between the docking conformation of the known commercialized herbicide sulfonylureas (a) and the target
compound II-10 (b) in the active site of AHAS.
binding conformation in the active site of AHAS, as shown
in Figure 2. However, further careful analysis found that the
synthesized compounds cannot form fully orthogonal bend
at the N-nitro amides group for strong conjugation formed
between adjacent the phenyl and carbonyl. Although the N-
nitro amides group and the adjacent aromatic ring are located
in the entrance of channel leading to the active site, they
could not very effectively prevent the substrate entrance. us
the candidate compounds showed lower inhibition activity
compared to sulfonylureas. Next, we would synthesize novel
target compounds with canceled strong conjugation formed
between adjacent phenyl and carbonyl.
Acknowledgments
is work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation
of Hubei Province (no. 2015CFB442).
References
[1] J. M. Green, “Review of glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting her-
bicide crop resistance and resistant weed management,” Weed
Technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 547–558, 2007.
[2] J. Hattori, R. Robert, D. Brown, G. Sunohara, and B. Miki, “Mul-
tiple resistance to sulfonylureas and imidazolinones conferred
by an acetohydroxyacid synthase gene with separate mutations
for selective resistance,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol.
232, pp. 167–173, 1991.
4. Conclusions
[3] G. W. Haughn and C. R. A. Somerville, “A mutation causing
imidazolinone resistance maps to the Csr1 locus of Arabidopsis
thaliana,” Plant Physiology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1081–1085, 1990.
rough this study, twenty-four N-nitro acid amide deriva-
tives compounds were synthesized based on the active site
of target AHAS enzyme, and all of the target compounds
were performed biological testing against AHAS enzyme
and herbicidal activity against Amaranthus mangostanus L.
and Sorghum sudanense. Compounds II-10, II-21, and II-22
[4] B. Cross, R. Hill, and W. H. Gastrock, “Phenylnitramine
herbicides,” U.S. Patent 3844762, 1974.
[5] B. Cross, R. Hill, and H. D. Dawe, “Fungicidal phenylnitramines
and new phenylnitramines,” U.S. Patent 4130645, 1978.
[6] T. D. O’Neal, P. R. Bhalla, and B. Cross, “Method for the control
of stem growth and stem stiffness of graminaceous crops,” U.S.
Patent 4643755, 1987.
[7] C. S. Chen, S. Z. Xu, X. G. Li, M. H. Cao, and J. P. Xiong,
“Antimicrobial activity of N-nitro-N-phenyl-Nꢀ-pyridyl urea
derivative and synthesize,” C.N. Patent 101584338, 2009.
[8] C. S. Chen, S. Z. Xu, X. L. Yue, H. J. Ma, J. H. Li, and Z. J. Wei, “N-
nitro-2,4,6-Trichloroaniline of synthesis and application,” C.N.
Patent 102311361, 2012.
[9] J. N. Jin, H. J. Ma, X. F. Cao et al., “e discovery of the novel
lead compound of N-nitroureas target on acetohydroxyacid
synthase,” Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 104, no. 3,
pp. 218–223, 2012.
[10] P. A. Yonova and G. M. Stoilkova, “Synthesis and bio-
logical activity of urea and thiourea derivatives from 2-
aminoheterocyclic compounds,” Journal of Plant Growth Reg-
ulation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 280–291, 2004.
[11] R. H. Tale, A. H. Rodge, G. D. Hatnapure, and A. P. Keche, “e
novel 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-one urea derivatives of N-
aryl urea: synthesis, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and anti-
fungal activity evaluation,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
Letters, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 4648–4651, 2011.
[12] A. P. Keche, G. D. Hatnapure, R. H. Tale, A. H. Rodge, and V. M.
Kamble, “Synthesis, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial eval-
uation of novel 1-acetyl-3,5-diaryl-4,5-dihydro (1H) pyrazole
with IC values of 7.09 mg/L, 9.07 mg/L, and 9.11 mg/L were
50
confirmed, respectively. Compounds II-8 and II-22 exhib-
ited considerable herbicidal activity to root of Amaranthus
mangostanus L. and Sorghum sudanense with EC values of
50
9.87 mg/L and 19.88 mg/L, respectively. Further analysis was
carried out based on the structure and interaction conforma-
tion in the active site of AHAS predicted by molecular dock-
ing to argue possible reason for the lower activity of target
compounds. Based on the interaction mechanism analysis,
further optimization for the lead compound would be per-
formed to improve inhibition activity in our research group.
Disclosure
Xiaojuan Qi and Wenjie Tang both are co-first authors.
Competing Interests
e authors declare that there are no competing interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ Contributions
Xiaojuan Qi and Wenjie Tang contributed equally to this
paper.