Role of Aromatic Interactions in Temperature-Sensitive Amphiphilic Supramolecular Assemblies

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04540

Aromatic interactions were found to greatly influence the temperature-dependent dynamic behavior within supramolecular assemblies. Using an amphiphilic dendron, we systematically changed the hydrophobic groups introducing increasing levels of aromaticity while keeping the hydrophilic part constant. We show that the supramolecular assemblies become less sensitive to temperature changes when aromatic interactions in the aggregate are increased. Conversely, the absence of aromaticity in the hydrophobic moieties produces temperature-sensitive aggregates. These results show that subtle molecular-level interactions can be utilized to control temperature-sensitive behavior in the nanoscale. These findings open up new design strategies to rationally tune the behavior of stimuli-responsive supramolecular assemblies on multiple spatiotemporal scales.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04540

Subscriber access provided by The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Article
Role of Aromatic Interactions in Temperature-
Sensitive Amphiphilic Supramolecular Assemblies
Oyuntuya Munkhbat, Matteo Garzoni, Krishna R. Raghupathi, Giovanni M. Pavan, and S. Thayumanavan
Langmuir, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04540 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Mar 2016
Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 10, 2016
Just Accepted
“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted
online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical
Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the
dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts
appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been
fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all
readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered
to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published
in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just
Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor
changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers
and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors
or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Langmuir is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
Washington, DC 20036
Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society.
However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works
produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course
of their duties.

Page 1 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Role of Aromatic Interactions in Temperature-Sensitive
Amphiphilic Supramolecular Assemblies
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Oyuntuya Munkhbat,†Matteo Garzoni,§Krishna R. Raghupathi,†Giovanni M. Pavan,§* and S.
Thayumanavan†*
†Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States
§Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern
Switzerland, Galleria 2, Manno 6928, Switzerland
AUTHOR EMAIL ADDRESS thai@chem.umass.edu; giovanni.pavan@supsi.ch
RECEIVED DATE
ABSTRACT: Aromatic interactions were found to greatly influence the temperature-dependent
dynamic behavior within supramolecular assemblies. Using an amphiphilic dendron, we systematically
changed the hydrophobic groups introducing increasing levels of aromaticity while keeping the
hydrophilic part constant. We show that the supramolecular assemblies become less sensitive to
temperature changes when aromatic interactions in the aggregate are increased. Conversely, the absence
of aromaticity in the hydrophobic moieties produces temperature-sensitive aggregates. These results
show that subtle molecular-level interactions can be utilized to control temperature-sensitive behavior in
the nanoscale. These findings open up new design strategies to rationally tune stimuli-responsive
supramolecular assemblies on multiple spatiotemporal scales.
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 2 of 22
1
2
3
4
INTRODUCTION
5
6
7
8
9
Amphiphilic supramolecular assemblies have been of great interest due to their potential utility
in a variety of applications such as drug delivery, biosensing and catalysis.1-10 Understanding the
molecular design elements that control not only the final macroscopic structural features, but also the
dynamic properties of the assembly is critical in developing versatile new supramolecular assemblies. In
this context, there is a notable interest in temperature-sensitive systems, as these facilitate convenient
extrinsic control over self-assembly.11-17 Oligo- and poly- ethylene glycol (OEG and PEG) based
systems have attracted considerable attention, because of their hydrogen bonding based interactions with
water that affords temperature-dependent hydrophilicity.18-20 In these cases, aggregation becomes
stronger at higher temperatures,21,22 because the loss of hydrogen bonding between the temperature-
sensitive functionalities and water reduces the amphiphilie’s hydrophilicity.21-23 Thus, most of these
sensitivities arise directly from the temperature-sensitive moiety itself. In this work, we show that
aromatic interactions, which are tucked within the interiors of the assembly,24,25 can also play a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of temperature dependent size transition of amphiphilic assemblies,
and role of aromaticity in this phenomenon.
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
fundamental role in controlling the temperature-sensitive behavior of supramolecular assemblies (Figure
1).
6
7
8
9
To evaluate the role of aromatic interactions on the temperature-sensitive self-assembly, we
designed facially amphiphilic dendrons with variable levels of aromaticity (Scheme 1). Dendrimers and
dendrons are interesting platforms for this study, as these combine the advantages of small molecule
amphiphiles in that they are structurally well-defined and polymers in that they are characterized by high
thermodynamic stabilities.26-35 The targeted aromatic hydrophobic units include phenyl, naphthyl, and
anthracyl moieties, having an increasing trend in hydrophobicity as well as aromaticity. Cyclohexyl
provides a useful comparison with a non-aromatic hydrophobic unit with similar geometry and rigidity.
To ensure uniformity, the dendrons were prepared using a modular approach, where the hydrophobic
group was ‘clicked’ on to propargyl moieties.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 1. Structures of the amphiphilic dendrons and the log P values of hydrophobic functional groups.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
Preparation of dendrimer solutions. Stock solution (100 µM) of each dendrimer was prepared by
dissolving the dendrimer in milli-Q water at room temperature. Solutions were sonicated for 3 hours,
and stirred at 4 oC for one week ahead of any experiment. Dendrimer solutions were diluted to required
concentrations before each experiment.
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 4 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements. The size distribution of the aggregates were
determined by Malvern Zetasizer (Nano-ZS). For each DLS experiment, 100 µM solution was diluted to
25 µM and filtered through 0.45 µm filter. Hydrodynamic radius (DH) of the dendritic assembly was
measured at different temperatures with 7 minutes of equilibration time to achieve desired temperature
before each measurement and repeated in triplicate. Size distribution, correlograms and PDI for all
samples can be found in the supporting information (Figure S1, Figure S2, Figure S3 and Table S1).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Dye encapsulation and guest exchange study. To a vial containing 1.2 mL of 25 µM dendrimer
solution added 2 µL of 0.77 mg/mL pyrene (in acetone) and perylene (in acetone) separately, followed
by evaporation of acetone by leaving the vial uncapped for 30 minutes while stirring at room
temperature. After 30 min, the vial is capped and solution was stirred for 24 hours at room temperature.
FRET experiments were performed on a JASCO (PF-6500) spectrofluorimeter and UV-Vis spectra were
collected using a Cary-100 scan spectrophotometer. FRET measurements started as soon as pyrene and
perylene containing dendrimer solutions (25 µM) were mixed (1:1 by volume). Pyrene was excited at
339 nm, pyrene and perylene emission were monitored at 375 and 447 nm respectively for the
calculation of FRET ratio.
Time-dependent fluorescence and host exchange. Time-lapse studies were performed on a PTI
Quantamaster-30 phosphorescence/fluorescence spectrofluorimeter with a xenon flash power supply and
TC125 temperature controller. Host exchange experiment of each dendron (CHE, PHE, NAP, and ANT)
with pyrene dendrimer, Pyr, was performed at 5 °C, 10 °C, 25 °C and 40 °C. Dendrimer solutions (25
µM) were pre-equilibrated at target temperature 1 °C for 30 min prior to mixing. 0.5 mL of Pyr solution
was added to a fluorescence cuvette in a thermoelectric cuvette holder and allowed to equilibrate. 0.5
mL of CHE was added through syringe directly into the cuvette and emission at 379 nm was monitored
with time. Instrument parameters were adjusted at 339 nm for excitation and 379 nm for emission.
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
Sample was being stirred at low rpm during the measurement. Same procedure was followed for all
other dendrons (PHE, NAP, and ANT).
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 6 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis
7
8
9
We designed the dendrons such that these molecules can be synthesized using a modular approach,
providing facile access to the target molecules. To achieve this, we used the G1 dendritic scaffold with
propargyl functionalities at every repeat unit of the dendron, shown as structure 8 in Scheme 2. This
functional group was used as the handle to simply vary the hydrophobic functional groups using the
Hüisgen-1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction, the so-called click chemistry.36-40 Module 8 was prepared by
reacting the biaryl molecule 6 with the 3,5-dialkoxybenzyl bromide 7 in the presence of potassium
carbonate and 18-crown-6, as shown in Scheme 2. All the targeted dendrons were successfully obtained
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the targeted dendrons (CHE, PHE, NAP and ANT).
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
using the copper-catalyzed click reaction between the propargyl core 8 and the azide functionalized
alkyl or aryl-substituted substrates 9-12 (see Supporting Information for synthetic details and
characterizations). The alkyl azides used in the click reaction were obtained from the corresponding
alkyl bromides by reaction with sodium azide.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Aggregation Behavior
First, we evaluated the self-assembly formation of each of these dendrons in water. Since the
critical aggregation concentrations of all these dendrons were well below 25 µM (Figure S5), all
dendrons were assembled at this concentration. The sizes of the assemblies were found to range between
150 and 180 nm at room temperature (Figure 2a), as discerned by dynamic light scattering (DLS)
measurements with good correlation functions (>0.85) and dispersities (0.04 and 0.18). We found that
the all of the dendrons form spherical micelle-like assemblies in water (See SI for TEM images, Figure
S4).
o
Figure 2. a) DLS results of the assemblies formed from all dendrons at 25 C; b) Size change for CHE dendron
o
o
assembly at 25 C (181 nm) and 5 C (95 nm); c) Temperature dependent DLS measurement for all dendrons from 40
oC to 5 oC; d) Temperature dependent transmittance for all dendrons from 70 oC to 5 oC.
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 8 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
The sizes of these assemblies were then evaluated at different temperatures. Interestingly, a
significant size reduction from 181 nm at 25 °C to 95 nm at 5 °C was observed for the cyclohexyl
dendron (CHE) (Figure 2b). This is reminiscent of the recently reported sub-LCST transition.41,42 The
results in Figure 2c show that the structural transition is most significant at ~18 °C for CHE dendron.
The phenyl dendron (PHE) also presents a structural transition at ~6 °C. Interestingly, naphthyl (NAP)
and anthracyl (ANT) dendrons do not exhibit any sub-LCST transitions, even though they also contain
PEG groups. These observations provided the first indications that the nature of the hydrophobic
substituents might have a significant influence over the thermal-sensitive behavior of these
supramolecular assemblies, and that the latter cannot be simply explained by hydrophilic-lipophilic
balance (HLB) variations – the behavior of the different aggregates do not have a direct correlation with
the log P of the substituents (Scheme 1).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Temperature-Dependent Exchange of Dendrons
We tested whether these temperature-sensitive transitions could be related to a differential stability of
the dendritic assemblies. Thanks to a recently reported time-lapse fluorescence method, which used a
pyrene-labeled dendron (Pyr) as the fluorescent probe (Figure 3a and 3b),41 we assessed the residence
time of the dendrons into the aggregate, and the dynamic exchange of dendrons with the solution.
Briefly, Pyr exhibits significant excimer emission in the assembled state, as the local concentration of
the pyrene within the assembly interior is very high. If Pyr aggregates are mixed in solution with the
other assemblies (CHE, PHE, NAP or ANT), a change in the pyrene fluorescence properties indicates
that the dendrons can exchange dynamically between the aggregates in solution (Figure 3c). We tracked
the increase in monomer emission intensity at 379 nm with time-lapse fluorescence spectroscopy upon
mixing of Pyr dendron with other dendrons (CHE, PHE, NAP and ANT), while varying the temperature.
Aqueous solutions of the dendrons (25 µM) were pre-equilibrated at the desired temperature for 30 min
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 3. a) Graphical illustration of dendron exchange experiment between Pyr and CHE. b) Structure of dendron Pyr;
c) Evolution of pyrene monomer and pyrene excimer emission of dendron Pyr due to the dendron exchange with different
concentrations of CHE Dendron; d-g) Time-based fluorescence measurement to monitor dendron exchange property of
each dendron with fluorescent-labeled dendron Pyr by tracking pyrene monomer emission (379 nm) at 5 oC and 25 oC: d)
CHE; e) PHE; f) NAP; g) ANT
and then mixed in a cuvette for immediate fluorescence measurement. For all trials, pre-measurement of
pyrene dendron solution alone was provided for few seconds prior to the addition of the mixing dendron
to ensure that there was no monomer emission initially. This setup allowed us to study whether the
monomer exchange dynamics of these assemblies vary with the solution temperature.
First, we compared the CHE and the PHE dendrons. These are geometrically similar, but cyclohexyl
units are more hydrophobic than phenyl units (see log P values in Scheme 1), while they lack
aromaticity. The data in Figure 3d and 3e clearly show that both dendrons exhibit faster dendron
exchange at 5 °C than at 25 °C. Overall, the exchange dynamics of CHE is faster than that of PHE.
Interestingly, the effect of changing the temperature on the assembly dynamics (temperature-sensitivity)
is also stronger for the CHE than for the PHE dendron. NAP dendron is expected to be more
hydrophobic than PHE and similar to CHE based on the log P of the hydrophobic moieties (Scheme 1).
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 10 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Nevertheless, although the hydrophobic moieties of the self-assembling dendrons possess comparable
hydrophobicity, the dynamics of NAP aggregates was found to be less sensitive to temperature changes
compared to that of CHE (Figure 3f and 3d) and similar to that of PHE (see Figure 3f and 3e). These
outcomes suggest that hydrophobicity itself is not the unique factor in controlling the assembly property
and that aromatic interactions, which include π-π and van der Waals interactions, can play a major role
in supramolecular structure and dynamics. Remarkably, the most hydrophobic and aromatic dendron
ANT was found to be not dynamic at any of the temperatures studied, and the most insensitive to
temperature variations (Figure 3g). Conversely, the assembly of non-aromatic CHE is the most sensitive
one to temperature variations, and the most dynamic one. The dynamic behavior of the aggregate seems
to become less temperature-sensitive, while the aromaticity of the dendrons is increased.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Guest Exchange Properties
Given that the exchange properties of these dendrons vary, it is interesting to investigate whether a
similar trend, dominated by aromatic interactions, would be observed with guest exchange in those
assemblies. Note that these amphiphilic assemblies can be hosts for non-covalently binding hydrophobic
guest molecules in the aqueous phase. To test whether the trend exists, we used a recently developed
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) based method to acquire guest exchange dynamics
(Figure 4a).43 For this study, we used pyrene and perylene as the hydrophobic FRET pair (see SI for
experimental details). We notice that the CHE dendron exhibited the fastest guest exchange, whereas
there was essentially no FRET observed for ANT dendron, suggesting that the exchange dynamics in
aromatic dendron assemblies are in general slower than the non-aromatic CHE dendron (Figure 4b).
There was a systematic trend in guest exchange dynamics of aromatic dendrons from PHE to NAP to
ANT, which suggests that the stability of the assembly (as determined by the guest encapsulation
stability) increases with increasing size of the aromatic side chain functionality. All these data are
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
consistent with the host exchange properties observed previously and highlight the importance of
understanding host exchange dynamics in amphiphilic supramolecular assemblies.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 4. a) Guest exchange experiment using pyrene and perylene; b) Normalized
FRET ratio of all dendrons at 25 oC.
Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation Study
Important questions remain open on the origin of the temperature-sensitivity in the dendron aggregates.
This is probably due to the interactions between the hydrophobic moieties inside the aggregates: the real
variables in this study. However, aromatic and hydrophobic interactions are unavoidably interconnected
in the tail-tail self-assembly in the real system. We have used all-atom molecular dynamics (MD)
simulations to obtain molecular-level details of the dendron self-assembly in solution. First, we built and
pre-equilibrated the single dendrons in water solution (see SI for computational details). Then, according
to the same procedure used for similar facially amphiphilic dendrons and polymers in solution,44,45 nine
dendrons of each type were immerged in a periodic simulation box filled with water molecules (Figure
5a). MD simulations were carried out at 25 and 5 °C for each system to study aggregation at different
experimental temperatures. All systems were simulated for 200 ns in NPT conditions. During this time,
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 12 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
the dendrons self-assembled and all systems reached the equilibrium in the MD regime (see SI for
details). The evolution of the radius of gyration (Rg) of the aggregates, of the PEG chains and of the
hydrophobic groups during the MD simulations (Figure 5) shows that, the aggregates tend to converge
to an equilibrated configuration where the hydrophilic PEG surrounds the hydrophobic groups to
minimize the interaction with the solvent. While full reorganization into an ideal micelle-like aggregate
is awkward for ANT and NAP structures due to the size and rigidity of the tail groups (Figure 5),
ordered stacking of hydrophobic groups appears in many regions of the assembly (e.g., green ANT
groups).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 5. Modeling dendrons self-assembly in solution. (a,c) Starting and equilibrated configuration of nine
CHE in solution (PEG: blue, dendron scaffold: black, CHE: magenta). (c,d,e) Equilibrated configuration for the
PHE (c: red), NAP (d: cyan), and ANT (d: green). (b,f,g,h) Radius of gyration (Rg) data of different groups of
the dendrons as a function of simulation time.
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Enthalpy H as measured from the MD simulations is a good indicator of molecular
solubility/hydrophobicity (see SI for comparison with log P).46 According to a validated approach,44,45
from the MD simulations we extracted the self-assembly enthalpy variations (ΔH) for each system at 5
°C and 25 °C (Table 1). While the ΔH values may depend on the flexibility of the different dendron
architectures, it is not really informative to compare the ΔH of the different systems, but rather it is
interesting to compare the ΔH of the same system at the two different T: ΔΔH = ΔH (25 °C) – ΔH (5
°C). The ΔΔH values in Table 1 show that some assemblies are temperature sensitive and others are not
– the more negative is the ΔΔH value, stronger is the interaction between the dendrons in the aggregates
at high (25 °C) rather than at low temperature (5 °C).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Table 1. Self-assembly enthalpies (∆H) of all dendrons at 5°C and 25°C, and related variations (∆∆H) expressed in kcal/mol.
Dendron
Rings[a]
1s
∆H(5°C)[b]
-107.3 ± 0.8
∆H(25°C)[b]
-123.3 ± 0.9
∆∆H = ∆H(25°C) - ∆H(5°C) [c]
CHE
-16 ± 1.2
PHE
NAP
ANT
1a
2a
3a
-91.1 ± 0.8
-92.1 ± 0.8
-95 ± 0.7
-94.8 ± 0.6
-93 ± 1.0
-3.7 ± 1.1
-0.9 ± 1.3
0.6 ± 0.9
-94.4 ± 0.6
[a] Number of rings per-hydrophobic groups (“s”: saturated; “a”: aromatic). [b] Self-assembly enthalpy ∆H is calculated as
the sum of solute-solute and solute-solvent interactions and is expressed in kcal/mol. [c] ∆∆H provides a measurement of
temperature sensitivity of the assemblies. All energies values are provided as average ± standard error.
ΔΔH is negligible for the more aromatic dendrons (NAP and ANT), whereas it is as high as -16
kcal/mol for the non-aromatic dendron CHE. The PHE system seems somewhat intermediate, with
reduced, yet non-negligible, ΔΔH (-3.7 kcal/mol), and consistent with the temperature-dependent size
transition and dendron exchange dynamics seen the experiments. In general, hydrophobic aggregation
becomes stronger at higher T, which is the case for the non-aromatic CHE. However, the MD data in
Table 1 show that over a certain level of aromaticity in the hydrophobic groups, the dendron interaction
into the aggregates is not temperature-sensitive.
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 14 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
We were then interested in understanding how much of the self-assembly is directly imputable to
hydrophobic tails of the dendrons: the real structural variables in this study. The radial distribution
functions, g(r), of the tail groups extracted from the MD simulations provide information on the
interaction between the hydrophobic groups in the assembly (Figure 6). The higher and sharper the g(r)
peak at short distance, the stronger the tail-tail interaction (i.e., coordination, stacking). The related tail-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 6. Tail-tail self-assembly interaction. (a-d) Radial distribution functions – g(r) – of the tail groups respect to
each other in the aggregates at 5°C (blue) and 25°C (red). High and sharp peaks at short distance identify stable
and strong interaction (coordination/stacking).
tail interaction free energies (∆Etail) reported in Table 2 were obtained for all systems from the g(r)
curves (see SI for details).44 The ∆Etail values show that the tail-tail interaction becomes stronger and
temperature- insensitive for increasing levels of aromaticity. ∆Etail is stronger at 25 °C than at 5 °C only
for the non-aromatic system (CHE).
While the ∆Etail energies include both hydrophobic and aromatic interactions, it is interesting to
know how much of the tails interaction is directly imputable to the aromatic (only short-range) rather
than to hydrophobic effects. The short-range aromatic contribution to self-assembly (∆Estack) was
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
calculated as the number of stably stacked groups in the assemblies multiplied by the stacking
interaction energies of CHE, PHE, NAP and ANT groups47 respectively (see SI for details), according to
the same approach adopted recently to quantify the role of hydrogen bonding in supramolecular
polymers.48 The remaining part of the tail-tail self-assembly energy (∆Etail) was assumed to be imputable
to hydrophobic effect (∆Ehyd). This analysis provides qualitative insight on the type of interactions in the
self-assembly and on their modulation in response to temperature change.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Table 2. Tail contribution to self-assembly. The tail-tail interaction free energy (∆Etail) for all dendrons at 5°C and 25°C is
expressed in kcal/mol. ∆Etail is also decomposed further into tail-tail stacking interaction (∆Estack) and tail-tail hydrophobic
interaction (∆Ehyd).
[a]
[a]
[b]
[b]
[c]
[c]
Dendron
∆Etail
∆Etail
∆Estack
∆Estack
∆Ehyd
∆Ehyd
(5°C)
-38.9
-49.6
-49.7
-57.6
(25°C)
-44.1
-50.4
-49.2
-55.9
(5°C)
(25°C)
(5°C)
(25°C)
CHE
PHE
NAP
ANT
-13.6 (35%)
-42.9 (86%)
-46.3 (93%)
-56.3 (98%)
-11.8 (27%)
-43.4 (86%)
-47.5 (97%)
-55.1 (98%)
-25.3 (65%)
-6.8 (14%)
-3.4 (7%)
-1.3 (2%)
-32.3 (73%)
-6.9 (14%)
-1.7 (3%)
-0.8 (2%)
[a] ∆Etail values are extracted from the g(r) (see SI). [b] ∆Estack values are evaluated from the number of stably stacked tail
groups in the assemblies multiplied for the stacking interaction energies of CHE, PHE, NAP and ANT groups.46 [c] ∆Ehyd is
calculated as the difference between ∆Etail and ∆Estack. All energies are expressed in kcal/mol.
The short-range tail-tail interactions (∆Estack) contribute only by 27-35% to the global tail-tail
interaction in the CHE system, indicating the predominantly hydrophobic nature of the self-assembly in
this case (Table 2). The long-range hydrophobic tail-tail interaction (∆Ehyd), 2-3 times stronger than
∆Estack in CHE, is also found to be temperature-sensitive (∆Ehyd: -25.3 vs. -32.3 kcal/mol at 5 and 25 °C
respectively). Conversely, in the cases where the tail groups are aromatic (PHE, NAP and ANT), the
short-range interactions (∆Estack) dominate the tails self-assembly (Table 2: ∆Estack is ≈86%-98% of the
total ∆Etail), all terms are found to be substantially invariant on temperature changes. These observations
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 16 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
clearly suggest that the dominance of aromatic interactions in these three dendrons substantially reduces
the overall temperature sensitivity of these supramolecular assemblies.
7
8
9
Conclusions
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
In summary, we have systematically probed the hydrophobic moiety of the facially
amphiphilic dendron while keeping the hydrophilic component unchanged in order to understand
the influence of aromatic functional groups in controlling the temperature-responsive behavior of
amphiphilic assemblies. Our combined experimental-theoretical approach provides a multiscale
picture of these self-assembled materials in solution. We demonstrate that the inclusion of an
increasing degree of aromaticity in the hydrophobic moieties of the self-assembling dendrons
produces temperature-insensitive supramolecular assemblies, regardless of the level of the side
chain hydrophobicity. On the other hand, when the hydrophobic groups of the dendrons lack
aromaticity, the self-assembly is mainly controlled by hydrophobic interactions and the
supramolecular material possesses a temperature-sensitive behavior. This study demonstrates
how subtle changes in the self-assembling structures can produce different structural and
dynamic properties on the supramolecular material. As amphiphilic assemblies are pursued in a
variety of applications that require kinetic stability, such as in drug delivery or sensing, the
design guidelines that emanate from this study will have broad implications.
References
1) Torchilin, V. P. Nat. Rev. Multifunctional, Stimuli-Sensitive Nanoparticulate Systems for Drug
Delivery. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 813-827.
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2) Kataoka, K.; Harada, A.; Nagasaki, Y. Block Copolymer Micelles for Drug Delivery: Design,
Characterization and Biological Significance. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 47, 113-131.
3) Kelley, E. G.; Albert, J. N. L.; Sullivan, M. O.; Epps, T. H. III. Stimuli-Responsive Copolymer
Solution and Surface Assemblies for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7057-
7071.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
4) Soussan, E.; Cassel, S.; Blanzat, M.; Rico-Lattes, I. Drug Delivery by Soft Matter: Matrix and
Vesicular Carriers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 274–288.
5) Yao, J.; Yang, M.; Duan, Y. Chemistry, Biology, and Medicine of Fluorescent Nanomaterials and
Related Systems: New Insights into Biosensing, Bioimaging, Genomics, Diagnostics, and Therapy.
Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 6130-6178.
6) Wang, Y.; Zhou, K.; Huang, G.; Hensley, C.; Huang, X.; Ma, X.; Zhao, T.; Sumer, B. D.;
DeBerardinis, R. J.; Gao, J. A Nanoparticle-Based Strategy for the Imaging of a Broad Range of
Tumours by Nonlinear Amplification of Microenvironment Signals. Nat. Mat. 2014, 13, 204-212.
7) Savariar, E. N.; Ghosh, S.; Gonzalez, D. C.; Thayumanavan, S. Disassembly of Noncovalent
Amphiphilic Polymers with Proteins and Utility in Pattern Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
5416-5417.
8) Peters, R. J. R. W.; Marguet, M.; Marais, S.; Fraaije, M. W.; van Hest, J. C. M.; Lecommandoux, S.
Cascade Reactions in Multicompartmentalized Polymersomes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14-
150.
9) Romsted, L. S.; Bunton, C. A.; Yao, J. Micellar Catalysis, a Useful Misnomer. Curr. Opin. Colloid
and Interface. Sci. 1997, 2, 622-628.
10) Astruc, D.; Chardac, F. Dendritic Catalysts and Dendrimers in Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101,
2991-3024.
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 18 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11) Lutz, J. F. Polymerization of Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) (Meth)Acrylates: Toward New Generations of
Smart Biocompatible Materials. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 3459-3470.
12) Lutz, J-F.; Weichenhan, K.; Akdemir, O.; Hoth, A. About the Phase Transitions in Aqueous
Solutions of Thermoresponsive Copolymers and Hydrogels Based on 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl
Methacrylate and Oligo(ethylene glycol) Methacrylate. Macromolecules. 2007, 40, 2503–2508.
13) Inoue, T.; Matsuda, M.; Nibu, Y.; Misono, Y.; Suzuki, M. Phase Behavior of Heptaethylene Glycol
Dodecyl Ether and Its Aqueous Mixture Revealed by DSC and FT-IR Spectroscopy. Langmuir.
2001, 17, 1833-1840.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
14) Lutz, J.-F.; Hoth, A. Preparation of Ideal PEG Analogues with a Tunable Thermosensitivity by
Controlled Radical Copolymerization of 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethyl Methacrylate and
Oligo(ethylene glycol) Methacrylate. Macromolecules. 2006, 39, 893-896.
15) Grzelczak, M.; Vermant, J.; Furst, E. M.; Liz-Marzan, L. M. Directed Self-Assembly of
Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010, 4, 3591-3605.
16) Yong Yao, Y.; Xue, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Huang, F. An Amphiphilic Pillar[5]arene: Synthesis,
Controllable Self-Assembly in Water, and Application in Calcein Release and TNT Adsorption. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15712–15715.
17) Chi, X.; Ji, X.; Xia, D.; Huang, F. A Dual-Responsive Supra-Amphiphilic Polypseudorotaxane
Constructed from a Water-Soluble Pillar[7]arene and an Azobenzene-Containing Random
Copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1440–1443.
18) Hey, M. J.; Ilett, S. M. Poly(ethylene oxide) Hydration Studied by Differential Scanning
Calorimetry. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 3671-3675.
1
2
19) Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. The Interaction of Poly(ethylene glycol) with Water Studied by H and H
NMR Relaxation Time Measurements. Macromolecules. 1996, 29, 4251-4257.
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
20) Vancoillie, G.; Frank, D.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Poly(oligo ethylene glycol acrylates).
Prog. Poly. Sci. 2014, 39, 1074-1095.
6
7
8
9
21) Chandler, D. Interfaces and the Driving Force of Hydrophobic Assembly. Nature. 2005, 437, 640-
647.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
22) Baldwin, R. L. Temperature Dependence of the Hydrophobic Interaction in Protein Folding. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 1986, 83, 8069-8072.
23) Holmberg, K.; Jonsson, B.; Kronberg, B.; Lindman, B. Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous
Solution. 2nd ed. J. Wiley: New York, 2002.
24) Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, 2nd ed.; J.
Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980.
25) Israelachvili, J. N.; Mitchell, D. J.; Ninham, B. W. Theory of Self-Assembly of Hydrocarbon
Amphiphiles into Micelles and Bilayers. J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans. 2 1976, 72, 1525-1568.
26) Fréchet, J. M. J. Dendrimers and Supramolecular Chemistry. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 4782-
4787.
27) Newkome, G. R.; Moorefield, C. N. From 1 → 3 Dendritic Designs to Fractal Supramacromolecular
Constructs: Understanding the Pathway to the Sierpiński Gasket. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3954-
3967.
28) Mignani, S.; El Kazzouli, S.; Bousmina, M. M.; Majoral, J.-P. Dendrimer Space Exploration: An
Assessment of Dendrimers/Dendritic Scaffolding as Inhibitors of Protein–Protein Interactions, a
Potential New Area of Pharmaceutical Development. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1327-1342.
29) Rosen, Brad M.; Wilson, Christopher J.; Wilson, Daniela A.; Peterca, Mihai; Imam, Mohammad R.;
Percec, V. Dendron-Mediated Self-Assembly, Disassembly, and Self-Organization of Complex
Systems. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6275-6540.
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 20 of 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
30) Moorefield, C. N.; Perera, S.; Newkome, G. R. Dendron Chemistry: Supramolecular Perspectives
and Applications. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2012, pp.1-54.
7
8
9
31) Astruc, D.; Boisselier, E.; Ornelas, C. Dendrimers Designed for Functions: From Physical,
Photophysical, and Supramolecular Properties to Applications in Sensing, Catalysis, Molecular
Electronics, Photonics, and Nanomedicine Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1857-1959.
32) Raghupathi, K.; Guo, J.; Munkhbat, O.; Rangadurai, P.; Thayumanavan, S. Supramolecular
Disassembly of Facially Amphiphilic Dendrimer Assemblies in Response to Physical, Chemical, and
Biological Stimuli. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2200-2211.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
33) Zimmerman, S. C.; Lawless, L. J. Supramolecular Chemistry of Dendrimers. Top. Curr. Chem.
2001, 217, 95-120.
34) Kanna, R. M.; Nance, E.; Kannan, S.; Tomalia, D. A. Emerging Concepts in Dendrimer-Based
Nanomedicine: From Design Principles to Clinical Applications. J. Int. Med. 2014, 276, 579-617.
35) Newkome, G. R.; Moorefield, C. N.; Baker, G. R.; Saunders, M. J.; Grossman, S. H. Unimolecular
Micelles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1991, 30, 1178-1180.
36) Lowe, A. B. Thiol-yne ‘Click’/Coupling Chemistry and Recent Applications in Polymer and
Materials Synthesis and Modification. Polymer. 2014, 55, 5517-5549.
37) Xi, W.; Scott, T. F.; Kloxin, C. J.; Bowman, C. N. Click Chemistry in Materials Science. Adv. Func.
Mater. 2014, 24, 2572-2580.
38) Iha, R. K.; Wooley, K. L.; Nystrom, A. M.; Burke, D. J.; Kade, M. J.; Hawker, C. J. Applications of
Orthogonal “Click” Chemistries in the Synthesis of Functional Soft Materials. Chem. Rev. 2009,
109, 5620-5686.
39) Kose, M. M.; Onbulak, S.; Yilmaz, I. I.; Sanyal, A. Orthogonally “Clickable” Biodegradable
Dendrons. Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 2707-2714.
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 22
Langmuir
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40) Yesilyurt, V.; Ramireddy, R.; Thayumanavan, S. Photoregulated Release of Noncovalent Guests
from Dendritic Amphiphilic Nanocontainers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 123, 3094-3098.
41) Fuller, J. M.; Raghupathi, K. R.; Ramireddy, R. R.; Subrahmanyam, A. V.; Yesilyurt, V.;
Thayumanavan, S. Temperature-Sensitive Transitions below LCST in Amphiphilic Dendritic
Assemblies: Host–Guest Implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8947-8954.
42) Raghupathi, K. R.; Sridar, U.; Byrne, A. K.; Thayumanavan, S. Influence of Backbone
Conformational Rigidity in Temperature-Sensitive Amphiphilic Supramolecular Assemblies. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5308-5311.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
43) Jiwpanich, S.; Ryu, J.-H.; Bickerton, S.; Thayumanavan, S. Noncovalent Encapsulation Stabilities in
Supramolecular Nanoassemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10683-10685.
44) Torres, D. A.; Garzoni, M.; Subrahmanyam, A. V.; Pavan, G. M.; Thayumanavan. S. Protein-
Triggered Supramolecular Disassembly: Insights Based on Variations in Ligand Location in
Amphiphilic Dendrons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5385-5399.
45) Kasimova, A. O.; Pavan, G. M.; Danani, A.; Mondon, K.; Cristiani, A.; Scapozza, L.; Gurny, R.;
Moeller. M. Validation of a Novel Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approach for Lipophilic Drug
Incorporation into Polymer Micelles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 4338-4345.
46) Enciso, A. E.; Garzoni, M.; Pavan, G. M.; Simanek, E. E. Influence of Linker Groups on the
Solubility of Triazine Dendrimers. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 1247-1252.
47) Grimme, S. Do Special Noncovalent π–π Stacking Interactions Really Exist. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 3430-3434.
48) Baker, M. B.; Albertazzi, L.; Voets, I. K.; Leenders, C. M. A.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Pavan, G. M.;
Meijer, E. W. Consequences of Chirality on the Dynamics of a Water-Soluble Supramolecular
Polymer. Nat. Comm. 2015, 6, 6234.
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Langmuir
Page 22 of 22
1
2
3
4
TOC Graphic
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment