Biochemistry 2010, 49, 1557–1559 1557
DOI: 10.1021/bi100013s
Site-Specific Incorporation of Fluorotyrosines into Proteins in Escherichia coli by
Photochemical Disguise†
Bryan J. Wilkins,‡ Samuel Marionni,‡ Douglas D. Young, Jia Liu,‡ Yan Wang,‡ Martino L. Di Salvo,§
Alexander Deiters,*, and T. Ashton Cropp*,‡
‡Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, §Dipartimento di Scienze
ꢀ
Biochimiche and Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza Universita di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5-00185 Roma,
Italy, and Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Received January 6, 2010; Revised Manuscript Received February 1, 2010
ABSTRACT: Fluorinated analogues of tyrosine can be used
to manipulate the electronic environments of protein active
sites. The ability to selectively mutate tyrosine residues to
fluorotyrosines is limited, however, and can currently only
be achieved through the total synthesis of proteins. As a
general solution to this problem, we genetically encoded
the unnatural amino acids o-nitrobenzyl-2-fluorotyrosine,
-3-fluorotyrosine, and -2,6-difluorotyrosine in Escherichia
coli. These amino acids are disguised from recognition by
the endogenous protein biosynthetic machinery, effectively
preventing global incorporation of fluorotyrosine into
proteins.
proteins can contain a multiplicity of fluorinated amino acid
substitutions.
Several attempts have been made to address this problem of
nonexistent site selectivity. Homogeneous proteins containing
fluorotyrosines have been produced by a combination of chemi-
cal peptide synthesis and expressed protein ligation (2). This is
limited to certain locations within a protein, typically at the
C-terminus, and can be technically challenging for proteins that
are sensitive to denaturation. Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis
has been performed in an in vitro protein expression system using
amber suppressor tRNAs that are chemically aminoacylated with
fluorotyrosines (6). This approach is limited by the requirement
for a laborious synthesis of the aminoacyl-tRNA and limited
protein yields. A more versatile method would be to use in vivo
unnatural amino acid mutagenesis based on an orthogonal
aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS)-tRNA pair enabling pro-
tein expression in E. coli with fluorotyrosine encoded by the
amber stop codon, TAG (7). In this paper, we report a general
method for this approach by temporarily masking fluorotyro-
sines from cellular metabolism using a photoremovable protect-
ing group (8-10).
We first chose to investigate the incorporation of o-nitrobenzyl-
2-fluorotyrosine (6) into proteins using a variant of the Methano-
coccus jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (ONB-YRS) that
was previously altered to accept the nonfluorinated amino
acid o-nitrobenzyltyrosine (5) as a substrate (11). The synthesis
of the caged fluorinated tyrosines 6-8 was achieved through
complexation of the tyrosines 2-4 with Cu2þ followed by
alkylation with o-nitrobenzylbromide [Scheme 1 and Supporting
Information (SI)], as previously reported for the conversion of 1
to 5 (11). Amino acids 2-4 were produced in enantiomerically
pure form from the corresponding fluorophenols 9-11, respec-
tively, using the enzyme tyrosine phenol lyase (TPL) (12). We
assumed that with such a small structural change to the substrate,
6 would be accepted by this enzyme and the amino acid could be
inserted into proteins using the previously described machinery.
After protein production, the caging group could be removed
by light irradiation, revealing the desired fluorinated protein.
Unfortunately, repeated attempts at producing protein [using the
gene encoding superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) (13)
having the permissive V150 codon mutated to TAG] containing 6
with ONB-YRS were unsuccessful. This disruption of substrate
specificity from a single fluorine was quite astonishing given that
2 and 3 are both substrates for the endogenous E. coli TyrRS.
Thus, we decided to create a new aaRS variant capable of
accepting 6 as a substrate. A new library was constructed in which
The fluorine atom is often considered an isosteric replacement
for hydrogen, unlikely to perturb structure, yet with a high
electronegativity that enables its application as a biological
probe. For example, the pKa of a tyrosine phenolic proton is
approximately 10, but the pKa of fluorotyrosine residues can
range from 5.2 to 9.0 depending on the extent of fluorination
(1, 2). Therefore, the acidity of individual amino acid side chains
within a protein can be precisely modulated in investigating the
participation of a given tyrosine residue in an acid-base catalysis
mechanism. The same concept applies to the redox properties of
fluorinated tyrosine residues (3). In the study of biologically
generated tyrosyl radicals, fluorotyrosines have peak reduction
potentials that range from 705 to 968 mV, depending upon the
extent and position of fluorination. This allows fluorotyrosines to
be used as comparison probes for tyrosine, which has a peak
potential of 642 mV (3).
The main limitation for the precise use of fluorinated amino
acids is the process by which they are currently introduced into
proteins. Because of the structural similarities to natural amino
˚
acids (fluorine has an only 0.15 A larger van der Waals radius
than hydrogen), fluorinated amino acids are often introduced
into proteins via global incorporation. For example, Escherichia
coli cells starved of tyrosine (1) can be grown in the presence of
2 or 3 (Scheme 1) to force incorporation of these analogues in
place of all tyrosine residues (4, 5). The obvious concern for
metabolic labeling is that there is no site control and the sample
†We thank the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-0848398 to
T.A.C. and A.D.) and the University of Maryland (Drs. Wayne T. and
Mary T. Hockmeyer Doctoral Fellowship to B.J.W.) for financial
support of this work. A.D. is a Beckman Young Investigator and a
Cottrell Scholar.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. A.D.: e-mail,
alex_deiters@ncsu.edu; phone, (919) 513-2958. T.A.C.: e-mail, acropp@
gmail.com; phone, (301) 405-1734; fax, (301) 314-9121.
r
2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/05/2010
pubs.acs.org/Biochemistry