Table 2. The Substrate Scopea
Scheme 1. Elaboration of Product 6a
racemic 6a could be elaborated to the optically active
pyrrolidine 10 in seven steps,9b which could be further
transformed to GABA and other useful compounds.9a,b In
sharp contrast, with enantioenriched 6a in hand herein,
enantioenriched 10 could be readily prepared in three steps
(Scheme 1). In addition, the optically active intermediate
pyrrolidinone 9 could be facilely obtained by hydrogenation
of 6a (93% ee) with Raney nickel9b or Pd/C as catalyst. It
should be noted when Raney nickel was used, addition of
acetic acid was necessary to avoid partial racemization, which
might be caused by the weak alkalinity of the catalyst
prepared from Ni-Al alloy and NaOH (aq). The relative
configuration of product was determined by H,H-NOESY
spectroscopy, which indicated trans-9 was formed selectively
(for details, see the Supporting Information). Saponification
of the ester 9 with alcoholic potassium hydroxide followed
by acidification gave the corresponding acid, which was
decarboxylated upon heating in m-xylene, providing 4-phen-
yl-2-pyrrolidinone 10 without loss of enantiopurity. The
absolute configuration of 10 was determined to be R by
comparison of optical rotation with reported value (see the
Supporting Information). With 10 as material, the optically
active GABA 11 and the pyrrolidine 12 could be easily
prepared.9 Similarly, 3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid
(pregabalin) and 3-(4-Cl-phenyl)-GABA (baclofen) could
also be easily synthesized starting from enantioenriched 6c
and 6q.
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were carried out with 7d/Ti(O-i-
Pr)4/8b (1:1:1, 10 mol %), olefin (0.1 mmol), CNCOOEt (0.5 mmol), and
i-PrOH (0.5 mmol) at 0 °C for 72 h. b 8c was used instead of 8b for entries
15-18. c 0.1 mLof toluene was used as solvent. d Isolated yield. e Determined
by chiral HPLC. The absolute configuration was assigned by converting
4a to pyrrolidinone 10 and comparing its optical rotation with literature
value.
2-naphthaldehyde and 3-thienyl aldehyde also showed good
results (Table 2, entries 13 and 14). It is noteworthy that
when it came to the aliphatic substrates, the biphenol 8c
proved superior to 8b, giving the products with good ee
values (Table 2, entries 15-18).
Interestingly, according to our previous studies,4 when
cinchonine 7c or quinidine 7a was subjected to catalyst
preparation, the S configuration was selectively adopted by
the biphenol 8a to generate the complex 7a (or 7c)/Ti/(S)-
8a, whereas the R configuration was preferred when cin-
chonidine 7d was used, which was believed should also
happen in the current catalyst system. As expected, when
The synthetic utility of this methodology was then
investigated. It was reported by a resolution strategy that
(6) For the asymmetric cyanation of aldehydes and ketones with
CNCOOEt as cyanide source, see: (a) Tian, S. K.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 6195. (b) Tian, J.; Yamagiwa, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3636. (c) Tian, J.; Yamagiwa, N.;
Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3021. (d) Belokon, Y. N.;
Blacker, A. J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4505. (e)
Belokon, Y. N.; Blacker, A. J.; Carta, P.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North, M.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 10433. (f) Yamagiwa, N.; Tian, J.; Matsunaga, S.;
Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3413. (g) Lundgren, S.;
Wingstrand, E.; Penhoat, M.; Moberg, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
11592. (h) Belokon, Y. N.; Ishibashi, E.; Nomura, H.; North, M. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 1775. (i) Li, Q. H.; Chang, L.; Liu, X. H.; Feng, X. M.
Synlett 2006, 1675. (j) Gou, S. H.; Chen, X. H.; Xiong, Y.; Feng, X. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5732. (k) Gou, S. H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. H.; Wang,
W. T.; Chen, F. X.; Feng, X. M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 343. (l)
Gou, S. H.; Liu, X. H.; Zhou, X.; Feng, X. M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7935.
(m) Chen, S. K.; Peng, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, L. W.; Chen, F. X.; Feng,
X. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 639. (n) Wang, W. T.; Gou, S. H.; Liu,
X. H.; Feng, X. M. Synlett 2007, 2875. (o) Belokon, Y. N.; Clegg, W.;
Harrington, R. W.; Ishibashi, E.; Nomura, H.; North, M. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 9724. (p) Peng, D.; Zhou, H.; Liu, X. H.; Wang, L. W.; Chen, S. K.;
Feng, X. M. Synlett 2007, 2448. (q) Reference 4b.
(7) For the asymmetric cyanation of aldimines and ketimines with
CNCOOEt as cyanide source, see: Abell, J. P.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 15118, and reference 4b.
(8) When TMSCN was used as cyanide source, mono- and di-TMS
biphenol were detected by TLC in the reaction mixture. So as the reaction
proceeded, the catalyst might be partially decomposed. In contrast,
CNCOOEt was much less reactive than TMSCN to react with biphenol. In
fact, no ethoxyformate protected biphenol was observed. Therefore, it might
be one of the reasons for the fact that CNCOOEt gave better result. Also,
it could not be ruled out the possibility that different reaction pathway might
go for these two structurally total different cyanide sources.
(9) (a) Sobocinska, M.; Zobacheva, M. M.; Perekalin, V. V.; Kuprysze-
wski, G. Pol. J. Chem. 1979, 53, 435. (b) Zelle, R. Z. Synthesis 1991, 1023.
(c) Martinez, C. A.; Hu, S.; Dumond, Y.; Tao, J.; Kelleher, P.; Tully, L.
Org. Process. Res. DeV. 2008, 12, 392.
1282
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010