pubs.acs.org/joc
Locked Nucleosides Based on
Oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane and
Oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane Skeletons
Ramprasad Ghosh, Joy Krishna Maity, Basudeb Achari,
and Sukhendu B Mandal*
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Chemical
Biology (a unit of CSIR), 4, Raja S. C. Mullick Road,
Jadavpur, Kolkata 700 032, India
Received February 4, 2010
FIGURE 1. Strategies for locked bicyclic nucleosides synthesis.
and solid-state conformations could be very similar, various
conformationally locked bicyclic nucleosides (10,20-linked,1
10,30-linked,2 20,30-linked,3 20,40-linked,4 30,40-linked,5 and
30,50-linked6) have been targeted for synthesis. These have
restricted geometrical shape, are potentially useful as inhi-
bitors of certain enzymes,7 and are building blocks of
oligonucleotides.8
We have been working for some time on the syntheses of
various nucleoside analogues from the cheap and readily
available 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-R-D-glucofuranose
exploiting the intramolecular nitrone cycloaddition (INC)
reaction as a synthetic tool.9 As a part of our program to
construct a new class of C(1)fC(5)-linked bicycles, we
envisioned two strategies (Figure 1), which entailed inclusion
of an olefin functionality at C-5 and an aldehyde unit at C-1
(path A), or an allyl moiety at C-1 and an aldehyde group at
Intramolecular nitrone cycloaddition (INC) reaction on a
D-glucose derived substrate carrying an allyl group at C-1
and an enose-nitrone at C-5 or an aldehyde-nitrone at C-1
and vinyl group at C-4 furnished a tricyclo[6.2.1.02,6]-
undecane or a tricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]decane ring structure.
These tricycles were converted to bicylic nucleosides with
oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane and oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane
rings in three steps. An oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane ring
compound could alternatively be formed by RCM reac-
tion between C-1-allyl and C-4-vinyl moieties and
transformed to nucleoside analogues through a nucleo-
philic substitution reaction. Participation of a neighbor-
ing benzyl ether substituent in one case paved the way for
an enantiodivergent synthesis.
(2) Kværnø, L.; Wightman, R. H.; Wengel, J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
5106–5109.
(3) Nielsen, P.; Pfundheller, H. M.; Olsen, C. E.; Wengel, J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3423–3434.
(4) (a) Enderlin, G.; Nielsen, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6891–6894. (b)
Obika, S.; Nanbu, D.; Hari, Y.; Andoh, J.; Morio, K.; Doi, T.; Imanishi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5401–5404. (c) Koshkin, A. A.; Singh, S. K.;
Nielsen, P.; Rajwanshi, V. K.; Kumar, R.; Meldgaard, M.; Olsen, C. E.;
Wengel, J. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3607–3630. (d) Kumar, S.; Hansen, M. H.;
ꢀ
Albæk, N.; Steffansen, S. I.; Petersen, M.; Nielsen, P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
6756–6769. (e) Srivastava, P.; Barman, J.; Pathmasiri, W.; Plash-Kevych, O.;
Wenska, M.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8362–8379.
(5) Freitag, M.; Thomasen, H.; Christensen, N. K.; Petersen, M.; Nielsen,
P. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3775–3786.
€
(6) (a) Tarkoy, M.; Bolli, M.; Schweizer, B.; Leumann, C. Helv. Chim.
The conformation of the sugar moiety in nucleosides is
believed to play a crucial role in modulating biological
activity. However, the attempt to correlate a specific type
of sugar conformation to bioactivity is beset with the twin
problem that the pentose ring is quite flexible in solution and
its conformation can differ sharply in the solid state. Con-
sequently, any structure-activity study based on solid-state
conformation would be imperfect. Thus, aiming at the
generation of nucleoside analogues for which both solution
Acta 1993, 76, 481–510. (b) Agrofoglio, L. A.; Challand, S. R. Acyclic,
Carbocylic and L-Nucleosides; Kluwer, Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 1998; pp 174-284. (c) Lin, T. S.; Luo, M. Z.; Liu, M. C.; Pai, S. B.;
Dutschman, G. E.; Cheng, Y. C. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 798–803. (d) Shaikh,
K. I.; Kumar, S.; Lundhus, L.; Bond, A. D.; Sharma, P. K.; Nielsen, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 1557–1566.
(7) Russ, P.; Schelling, P.; Scapozza, L.; Folkers, G.; De Clercq, E.;
Marquez, V. E. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5045-5054 and references cited
therein.
(8) Meldgaard, M.; Wengel, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000,
3539-3554 and references cited therein.
(9) (a) Roy, B. G.; Maiti, J. K.; Drew, M. G. B.; Achari, B.; Mandal, S. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8821–8825. (b) Tripathi, S.; Roy, B. G.; Drew,
M. G. B.; Achari, B.; Mandal, S. B. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7427–7430.
(c) Shing, T. K. M.; Elsley, D. A.; Gillhouley, J. G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1989, 1280–1282. (d) Gallos, J. K.; Stathakis, C. I.; Kotoulas, S. S.;
Koumbis, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6884–6890.
(1) (a) Plash-Kevych, O.; Chatterjee, S.; Honchanenko, D.; Pathmasiri,
W.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4716–4726. (b) Loiseleur, O.;
Ritson, D.; Nina, M.; Crowley, P.; Wagner, T.; Hanessian, S. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 6353–6363.
DOI: 10.1021/jo100194z
r
Published on Web 03/02/2010
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2419–2422 2419
2010 American Chemical Society