C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
observed in all of the MS/MS spectra. These experiments col-
lectively demonstrate that alkynyl-acetate analogs 2 and 5 function
as efficient chemical reporters for protein acetylation in Vitro and
in cells, respectively. Notably, fluorescent profiling of various
mammalian cell lines with 4, 5, and 6 revealed distinct and analog-
specific patterns of acetylomes in diverse cell types, which
highlights the generality and utility of these bioorthogonal chemical
reporters for protein acetylation detection (Figure S6).
Unraveling the functions of protein acetylation remains a
challenging task. The bioorthogonal chemical reporters presented
here provide readily accessible non-radioactive reagents for fluo-
rescence profiling and large-scale analysis of protein acetylomes.
Moreover, alkynyl-acetyl-CoA analogs enable rapid and sensitive
detection of KAT activities that should be useful for assigning
protein substrates in complex mixtures. This chemical approach
provides experimental tools complementary to anti-acetyl-Lys
antibodies,12a,b MS/MS,12a,b bioinformatic methods,12c and affinity-
based CoA probes.13 The functional analysis of KAT-regulated
acetylation will be essential going forward. The incorporation of
quantitative proteomic methods12b and bump-hole strategies14 in
the future should expand the utility of these chemical tools and
facilitate the functional analysis of protein acetylation in physiology
and disease.
Figure 2. Fluorescent detection of acetate reporter (4, 5, or 6)-labeled (a)
core histones, (b) purified histone H3, and (c) total cell lysates from Jurkat
T cells.
curcumin (Figure S5d), which suggests these acetate analogs may
also be utilized by other KATs or acyltransferases or incorporated
by chemical acylation. Nonetheless, these cellular experiments
suggest that 4, 5, and 6 can be converted into active alkynyl-acetyl-
CoA analogs in cells by promiscuous acetyl-CoA11 or acyl-CoA
synthetases and post-translationally installed onto proteins in living
cells.
To identify proteins metabolically labeled by 4, 5 and 6, Jurkat
T cell lysates were subjected to CuAAC with the cleavable azido-
diazo-biotin tag (Scheme S4) followed by affinity purification on
streptavidin beads (Figure S7). Subsequent treatment of the
streptavidin beads with sodium dithionite enabled efficient elution
of the captured proteins for gel-based proteomics using an LTQ-
Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A survey of the protein hits from the
cell lysates metabolically labeled with 4, 5, and 6 revealed many
reported (86%) as well as new candidate (14%) Lys-acetylated
proteins (Table S2). Our p300-acylation studies and cellular labeling
and proteomics data suggest that both 4-pentynoate derivatives (2
and 5) are the optimal chemical reporters for detecting protein
acetylation in Vitro and in cells. Though 4 and 6 can also
metabolically label Lys-acetylated proteins in cells, the CoA
derivative of 4, 3-butynoyl-CoA (2) is an unstable substrate for in
Vitro reactions, and 6 may also target long-chain fatty-acylated
proteins in cells (i.e., transferrin receptor, SNAP-23) as indicated
in the MS/MS-identified proteins lists (Table S2). We therefore
focused on 5 for additional proteomic studies. From three inde-
pendent proteomic experiments (Figures S7 and S8), we identified
approximately 194 4-pentynoate-labeled proteins from Jurkat T cells
(Tables S2 and S3), 86% of which were also identified by anti-
acetyl-Lys proteomic studies.12a,b We confirmed the enrichment of
several MS/MS-identified acetylated proteins, including Ku70,
moesin, cofilin, coronin-1A, Hsp90, HMG-1, and adenosine deami-
nase by Western blotting analysis of the affinity-enriched proteins
(Figure S8b). Bioinformatic analysis of our data set suggests that
the majority of acetylated proteins reside in the nucleus and
cytoplasm and are associated with diverse cellular functions ranging
from metabolism and signal transduction to gene expression (Figure
S8c).
Acknowledgment. We thank the members of the Hang labora-
tory for reagents and advice, Prof. Robert G. Roeder and Dr. Sohail
Malik for support, and the Rockefeller University Proteomics
Resource Center for MS analysis. This work was supported by the
Anderson Cancer Center Postdoctoral Fellowship at Rockefeller
University (Y.-Y.Y.) and NIH/NRSA (1F32DK082140-01A1 to
J.M.A.). H.C.H. acknowledges support from Rockefeller University
and NIH/NIDA (1R21DA025751-01).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
supporting figures. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) (a) Yang, X. J.; Seto, E. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 449. (b) Mukherjee, S.; Hao,
Y.-H.; Orth, K. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32, 210.
(2) Lin, Y.-Y.; Lu, J.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Walter, W.; Dang, W.; Wan, J.; Tao, S.-
C.; Qian, J.; Zhao, Y.; Boeke, J. D.; Berger, S. L.; Zhu, H. Cell 2009, 136,
1073.
(3) Brownell, J. E.; Allis, C. D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 6364.
(4) Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6974.
(5) Meldal, M.; Tornøe, C. W. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2952.
(6) An, W.; Roeder, R. G. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 1504.
(7) (a) Chen, Y.; Sprung, R.; Tang, Y.; Ball, H.; Sangras, B.; Kim, S. C.; Falck,
J. R.; Peng, J.; Gu, W.; Zhao, Y. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2007, 6, 812. (b)
Cheng, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Kim, S.; Liu, H.; Li, S. S. C.; Gu, W.;
Zhao, Y. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8, 45. (c) Yu, M.; de Carvalho,
L. P. S.; Sun, G.; Blanchard, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15356.
(8) Charron, G.; Zhang, M. M.; Yount, J. S.; Wilson, J.; Raghavan, A. S.;
Shamir, E.; Hang, H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4967.
(9) Thompson, P. R.; Kurooka, H.; Nakatani, Y.; Cole, P. A. J. Biol. Chem.
2001, 276, 33721.
(10) (a) Marks, P. A. Oncogene 2007, 26, 1351. (b) Balasubramanyam, K.;
Varier, R. A.; Altaf, M.; Swaminathan, V.; Siddappa, N. B.; Ranga, U.;
Kundu, T. K. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 51163.
(11) Ingram-Smith, C.; Woods, B. I.; Smith, K. S. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 11482.
(12) (a) Kim, S. C.; Sprung, R.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ball, H.; Pei, J.; Cheng, T.;
Kho, Y.; Xiao, H.; Xiao, L.; Grishin, N. V.; White, M.; Yang, X.-J.; Zhao,
Y. Mol. Cell 2006, 23, 607. (b) Choudhary, C.; Kumar, C.; Gnad, F.;
Nielsen, M. L.; Rehman, M.; Walther, T. C.; Olsen, J. V.; Mann, M. Science
2009, 325, 834. (c) Basu, A.; Rose, K. L.; Zhang, J.; Beavis, R. C.;
Ueberheide, B.; Garcia, B. A.; Chait, B.; Zhao, Y.; Hunt, D. F.; Segal, E.;
Allis, C. D.; Hake, S. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 13785.
(13) Hwang, Y.; Thompson, P. R.; Wang, L.; Jiang, L.; Kelleher, N. L.; Cole,
P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7621.
To verify that 5 targets Lys residues on proteins in cells,
4-pentynoate-labeled Jurkat T cell lysates were CuAAC-biotiny-
lated, trypsin-digested in solution, purified using streptavidin beads,
and eluted with Na2S2O4 for MS/MS sequencing. Analysis of the
recovered peptides demonstrated that 5 is metabolically incorporated
onto known sites of Lys acetylation on histones H2B, H3, and H4
(Figure S9). The characteristic marker ion (mass ) 259 Da)
corresponding to the fragmentation peak of the modified lysine
residue (4-pentynoate + CuAAC/Na2S2O4 cleavage adduct) was
(14) Blethrow, J. D.; Glavy, J. S.; Morgan, D. O.; Shokat, K. M. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 1442.
JA908871T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 11, 2010 3641