of a natural peptide linkage at the ligation site. Clearly,
cysteine-based native chemical ligation (NCL),6 developed
by Kent and co-workers, is the first and the best method in
this regard, and it has become no doubt the most powerful
method in synthetic peptide chemistry. Cysteine-based NCL
features a thio capture between an N-terminal cysteine and
a C-terminal thioester, as a transthioesterification step which
is highly chemoselective, followed by a rapid 1,4 SfN acyl
transfer to afford a natural Xaa-Cys peptidic linkage (Xaa
represents any amino acid). Its efficiency, ease of operation,
and chemoselectivity (in the presence of any unprotected
amino acid) are very attractive to its users/practitioners; thus,
cysteine-based NCL has been widely used for chemically
synthesizing many proteins.7
ligation site.11 The method achieved great chemoselectivity,
but the ligation was extremely slow11 when threonine or
serine was used at the N-terminus, and more importantly,
the conversion from the pseudoproline structure into natural
peptidic bonds was not achieved.11 Therefore, although these
works have conceptually demonstrated the utility of weakly
activated alkylesters as acyl donors for chemoselective
peptide ligation at serine and threonine sites, they are unable
to provide a convergent synthesis of proteins or polypeptides
with the natural peptide sequence.
However, the rare presence of the cysteine residue (1.4%
content in proteins) has limited the utility of NCL (most
peptide pharmaceuticals rarely contain an internal cysteine1).
To address this issue, people have extensively searched for
alternative “native chemical ligation” methods at other amino
acid sites over the past decade.8 We are interested in the
development of ligations at serine9 and threonine sites. We
took note that the cysteine-NCL achieving the chemoselec-
tivity lies in that the N-terminal cysteine can differentiate
itself from other inner unprotected amino acid functional
groups with its bifunctionality: 1,2-mercaptoamine. On the
other hand, the capture-rearrangement chemical ligation
does not involve activating the carboxyl group; thus, it is
effective to overcome the racemization problem of the
conventional segment condensation method. Following the
same logic, it is conceivable that serine and threonine possess
great promise for achieving chemoselective ligation due to
their 1,2-hydroxyamine bifunctionality. We were attracted
by the imine-induced proximity acyl-transfer approach. Such
a strategy was originally introduced by Kemp10 and fully
developed by Tam to ligate a C-terminal glycolaldehyde
peptide with another peptide containing a Cys, Thr, or Ser
residue at the N-terminus to furnish a coupled product with
a pseudoproline structure (thiazolidine or oxazolidine) at the
Figure 1. Proposed Ser/Thr-based chemical ligation resulting in a
natural peptide bond at the ligation site.
We believe that, with further extensive investigations, a
Ser/Thr-based chemical ligation resulting in natural Xaa-Ser/
Thr linkage at the ligation site using such an imine
capture-rearrangement strategy can be realized. We con-
ceived of the idea of using a two-step strategy (Figure 1).
The first step involves the amine group of the N-terminal
serine or threonine reversibly reacting with the aldehyde
group of the C-terminus to form an imine, followed by the
cyclization from the R-hydroxyl group of the N-terminal
serine or threonine. Next, an OfN acyl transfer affords a
stable acetal intermediate. Other nucleophiles such as lysine
may also react with the aldehyde group, but the reaction is
reversible and unable to generate a stable product. The
second step is to remove the formed acetal group to afford
the natural peptide bond. In order to develop a practical
chemoselective peptide ligation based on the above strategy,
two questions must be addressed: (1) whether either the imine
capture step or the acyl transfer step can be accelerated (it
is not known which step is the rate-determining step) and
(2) whether the formed pseudoproline moiety12 can be readily
transformed into natural peptide linkages. The second
question is more challenging and critical because the removal
conditions should ideally be simple without any sophisticated
chemistry and compatible with other functionalities in
peptides or even oligosaccharides in glycopeptides.
(6) Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. W.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Kent, S. B. H. Science
1994, 266, 776–779.
(7) (a) Kent, S. B. H. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 338–351. (b)
Muralidharan, V.; Muir, T. W. Nature Methods 2006, 3, 429–438. (c)
Cotton, G. J.; Muir, T. W. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, R247–R256.
(8) For methods by post-modifying the cysteine-NCL product, see: (a)
Yan, L. Z.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 526–533. (b) Wan,
Q.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 9248–9252. (c)
Okamoto, R.; Kajihara, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5402–5406.
(d) Canne, L. E.; Bark, S. J.; Kent, S. B. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
5891–5896. (e) Offer, J.; Boddy, C. N. C.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 4642–4646. (f) Wu, B.; Chen, J.; Warren, J. D.; Chen, G.;
Hua, Z.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4116–4125.
(g) Crich, D.; Banerjee, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10064–10065.
(h) Haase, C.; Rohde, H.; Seitz, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6807–
6810. (i) Chen, J.; Wan, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8521–8524. Other significant non-cysteine NCL-
derived chemoselective ligations include traceless Staudinger ligation and
decarboxylative amide ligation. (j) Nisson, B. L.; Kiessling, L. L.; Taines,
R. T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1939–1941. (k) Tam, A.; Soellner, M. B.; Raines,
R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11421–11430. (l) Bode, J. W.; Fox,
R. M.; Baucom, K. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1248–1252. For
a sugar-assisted ligation, see: (m) Brik, A.; Yang, Y. Y.; Ficht, S.; Wong,
C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5626–5627.
Among many candidates, we tentatively identified the
(thio)salicylaldehyde ester as a potential functional donor at
(11) (a) Liu, C.-F.; Tam, J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91,
6584–6588. (b) Liu, C.-F.; Tam, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4149–
4153. (c) Tam, J. P.; Miao, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9013–09022.
(12) Serine and threonine pseudoprolines in the form of ψMe,Me pro were
originally developed by Mutter and widely used in Fmoc SPPS: Haack, T.;
Mutter, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1589–1592.
(9) A “serine” ligation was reported deriving from post-modification of
a cystein-NCL product; see ref 7c.
(10) Kemp, D. S. Biopolymer 1981, 20, 1793–1804. (b) For a compre-
hensive review, see: Coltart, D. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3449–3491.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1725